green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jessie Gomez v. Bill J. Bunnell
We interpreted the holding in Waltreus to be "that arguments rejected on appeal will not be reviewed again in habeas." Id. at 1034.
cited
Cited "see"
Buckley v. Paperboy Ventures, LLC
See Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d *12 854, 865 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buckley v. Paperboy Ventures, LLC
See Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d 854, 865 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, Inc., 647 F.3d 291, 322 (6th Cir.2011); Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law § 823 cmt. a (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelly
See Webster, 108 F.3d U.S.1042 (1987), and United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d at 1158, Ramacci, 15 F.3d at 78 , and Lamere, 980 F.2d at 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Kelly
See United States v. Crachy, 800 F.2d 83, 87 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 905 , 93 L.Ed.2d 856 (1987), and United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Morris
See State v. Caminita, 411 So.2d 13, 17 (La.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 314 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7448, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,269 Jose Jesus Ceja v. Terry Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections Donald Wawrzaszek, Superintendent of Arizona State Prison
See Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1034-35 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ceja v. Stewart
See Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1034-35 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
(2×)
See Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1033-34 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); see also Brownstein v. Director, Illinois Dept. of Corrections, 760 F.2d 836 , 841 n. 2 (7th Cir.) (" '[P]rocedural default' requires the by-pass of a procedural requirement, and not merely the by-pass of a procedural opportunity.") (citing Maxwell with approval), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 858 , 106 S.Ct. 166 , 88 L.Ed.2d 138 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dent
See United States v. Lewis, 676 F.2d 508, 511 (11th Cir.) (holding that a telephone call from a county in Florida to a county in Texas to arrange a meeting to plan the conspiracy was a sufficient overt act in both counties), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Dixon
See Silverstein v. Henderson, 706 F.2d 361, 368 (2d Cir.) (State court's denial of collateral relief under § 440.-10(2)(a) following state appellate court’s rejection of defendant’s federal claim on the merits "does not constitute a finding of procedural default that would bar federal consideration of Sil-verstein’s claims.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 195 , 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983); accord Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1034 (9th Cir.) (applying California law), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kermit Smith, Jr. v. Gary Dixon, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Kermit Smith, Jr. v. Gary Dixon, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
See Silverstein v. Henderson, 706 F.2d 361, 368 (2d Cir.) (State court's denial of collateral relief under § 440.10(2)(a) following state appellate court's rejection of defendant's federal claim on the merits "does not constitute a finding of procedural default that would bar federal consideration of Silverstein's claims."), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 195 , 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983); accord Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1034 (9th Cir.) (applying California law), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982). 11 The State also concedes that Maynard applies retr…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Moore
See United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 383 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982). 7 Prior to trial, Moore filed a motion asking for voir dire of identification witnesses.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.
(2×)
See United, States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 383 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Competex, S.A. v. Labow
See Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d 854 , 865 & n. 7 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); cf. Erie R.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie R. Richmond
See United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982). 5 In the instant case, defendant did not reveal the nature of his defense during opening argument, nor did he affirmatively concede the intent issue during the colloquy about the admissibility of the evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hugh F. Kent
See United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 459 U.S. 976 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dr. John Bovee
See United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tat Ba v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 660 F.2d 854 , 864-65 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); Ngoc Dung Thi Tran v. Citibank, 586 F.Supp. 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Sokoloff, 250 N.Y. at 80 , 164 N.E. at 749 . 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank W. Smith v. E.P. Perini
See U.S. v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); Summit v. Bordenkircher, 608 F.2d 247 (6th Cir.1979); U.S. v. Russell, 532 F.2d 1063 (6th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary F. Epley, Ronald J. Pike, and James Goodman
See, e.g., United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Edward Moore, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1036 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); Fritz v. Spalding, 682 F.2d 782, 784-85 (9th Cir.1982); Savage v. Estelle, 924 F.2d 1459 , 1463 n. 7 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1255 , 111 S.Ct. 2900 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthew Barrentine and Dwayne Ferguson
See, e.g., United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caldwell
See United States v. Barnes, 681 F.2d 717, 724 (11th Cir.), reh’g denied, 694 F.2d 233 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1046 , 103 S.Ct. 1447 , 75 L.Ed.2d 802 (1983) (drug trafficking crime “is ‘committed’ for venue purposes both in the district where the call was made and in the district where the call was received.”); see also United States v. Lewis, 676 F.2d 508, 511 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indag, S.A. v. Irridelco Corp.
This is a “substantive question” on which the Court is “compelled to apply New York law.” Competex, S.A. v. Labow, 783 F.2d 333, 334 (2d Cir.1986); see also Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d 854, 865-67 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Townsend
See also United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel John Passarella
See, e.g., United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); McFayden-Snider, 552 F.2d at 1183 ; Largent, 545 F.2d at 1043 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank L. Hook
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 385 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); United States v. Parisien, 574 F.2d 974, 976 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 850 , 99 S.Ct. 154 , 58 L.Ed.2d 154 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jerome M. Armant v. Joe Marquez
(2×)
See also Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1036 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vernon G. Harrell
Id. at 739 ; see also United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 (1982). 9 Evidence that defendant filed false W-4 or withholding statements claiming exemption from federal withholding tax, and that he avoided the payment of tax, was relevant and probative of defendant's intent, willfulness, and motive for failing to file tax returns.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mohammed Ismail
See, e.g., United States v. Hamilton, 684 F.2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); McFadyen-Snider, 552 F.2d at 1183 ; Largent, 545 F.2d at 1043 . 7 Ismail contends that the testimony about hashish and cocaine was not admitted for a proper purpose, that the other acts were not similar to or near in time to the offenses charged in the indictment and that the evidence was far more prejudicial than probative.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dothan Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., a Corporation, Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., a Corporation v. United States
(2×)
Compare, Maxwell v. Sumner, 673 F.2d 1031, 1036 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982) and Constructora Maza, Inc. v. Banco de Ponce, 616 F.2d 573, 576 (1st Cir.1980) ("clearly erroneous" rule applies even when findings are based solely on documentary evidence or on inferences from undisputed facts) with Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 614 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 800 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982) and Lydle v. United States, 635 F.2d 763 , 765 n. 1 (6th Cir.1981) (holding the "clearly er…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ivan W. Brown and Gordon M. Kenngott
See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 676 F.2d 508, 511 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982) (phone call from defendant in Florida to Texas sufficient to establish venue in Texas); United States v. Cordero, 668 F.2d 32, 43-44 (1st Cir. 1981) (as amended); United States v. Schmucker-Bula, 609 F.2d 399, 402 (7th Cir.1980); United States v. Spiro, 385 F.2d 210, 212 (7th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank
See also Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d 854, 862 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); United Bank Ltd. v. Cosmic International, Inc., 542 F.2d 868, 873 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See also Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d 854, 862 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 313 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982); United Bank Ltd. v. Cosmic International, Inc., 542 F.2d 868, 873 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
See also United States v. Hamilton , 684 F.2d 380 , 383 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976 , 103 S.Ct. 312 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982) ("Muszynski's inability to pick Hamilton out of the photo array did not render his in-court identification invalid.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCarty
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-5439.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1982.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.