green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.
But see ___________ ________ United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931-33 (3d Cir. 1982) ______________ _____ (concluding that Garmon does not apply to conflicts between the ______ NLRA and federal statutes), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 (1983). _____ ______ Because the NLRA's relationship with a state statute implicates the Supremacy Clause, and its relationship with a federal statute does not, some courts hold that the analysis in the former situation should be stricter than in the latter.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Vincent R. Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corporation, John F. Polmonari, Edward Menard, and Steven Dickie
But see United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931-33 (3d Cir.1982) (concluding that Garmon does not apply to conflicts between the NLRA and federal statutes), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "but see"
Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.
But see United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931-33 (3d Cir. 1982) (concluding that Garmon does not apply to conflicts between the NLRA and federal statutes), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Hoggard v. State, 277 Ark. 117 , 640 S.W.2d 102 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 495 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
10 Communications Reg. (P&f) 695, 11 Communications Reg. (P&f) 695 Iowa Utilities Board, Bell Atlantic Corporation, Intervenors on Appeal v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America
See American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 669 F.2d 957, 961 (5th Cir.1982) ("Having the power, we also have the duty to clarify the mandate and to direct future compliance with it by mandamus."), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission
See American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 669 F.2d 957, 961 (5th Cir.1982) (“Having the power, we also have the duty to clarify the mandate and to direct future compliance with it by mandamus.”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Theodore Towne Dane Joseph Treiber
See United States v. Brock, 667 F.2d 1311, 1323 (9th Cir.1982) (“When a warrant incorporates an affidavit and the affidavit specifically lists the items expected to be found, the warrant and affidavit together satisfy the specificity requirement.”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1271 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983); United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 752 (9th Cir.1979) (affidavit, through incorporation by reference into warrant, “thus became part of it”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 , 100 S.Ct. 674 , 62 L.Ed.2d 649 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983) (scheme to defraud employees of. loyal, faithful, and honest service from their union officials constitutes mail fraud). 9 However, the RICO statute only allows those plaintiffs “injured in [their] business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962” to sue. . 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (c).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bonnie Ann Durham
See United States v. Brock, 667 F.2d 1311, 1315 (9th Cir.) (sufficient evidence of conspiracy where a defendant places a large order for a precursor chemical and takes the chemical to a remote facility where a methamphetamine laboratory is found), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 (1983). 9 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 10, 1987. Does I Through IV v. United States
See United States v. Brock, 667 F.2d 1311, 1322 (9th Cir.1982), (“a warrant must be reasonably specific, rather than elaborately detailed, in its description of the objects of the search”) cert. denied 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1271 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas Health Care Ass'n v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services
See American Trucking Ass’n., Inc. v. I.C.C., 669 F.2d 957, 961 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983), (court declined to advise the I.C.C. as to the legality of proposed rules of the I.C.C.).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Esposito
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 938 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Romaine Phillips, at No. 88-1136. United States of America v. Matthias Brown, A/K/A \Sonny
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982) (upholding a jury instruction where district court defined “racketeering activity” “as the commission of ‘at least two of the acts of racketeering alleged in the indictment’ ”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan R. Stoneman
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 926 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Athanasios Theodoropoulos, A/K/A \Tommy\". Appeal of Athanasios Theodoropoulos. United States of America v. George Karivalis
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 933 (3d Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 51 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodoropoulos
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 933 (3d Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 51 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Menelao Orlando Estevez, Appeal of Jose Guillermo Haro
Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(c)(2); see United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 939 (3d Cir.1982) (indictment charging appellant’s interests in certain corporations subject to forfeiture sufficiently alleged extent of interests for purposes of Rule 7(c)(2)), certiorari denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miguel Mada-Luna v. Eugene M. Fitzpatrick, Acting District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
Second, they must not establish a “binding norm” or be “finally determinative of the issues or rights to which [they are] addressed,” but must instead leave INS officials “free to consider the individual facts in the various cases that arise.” Ryder, 716 F.2d at 1377 ; Jean, 711 F.2d at 1481 & n. 21; American Mining Congress, 671 F.2d at 1263 ; Burroughs Wellcome, 649 F.2d at 224 ; Iowa Power and Light, 647 F.2d at 811; American Business Association, 627 F.2d at 529-30; Guardian Federal, 589 F.2d at 666-67 ; Pacific Gas, 506 F.2d at 38 ; Mast Industries, 596 F.2d at 1579; see Ameri…
cited
Cited "see"
Packard Elevator, Farmers Cooperative Society, Incorporated, Farmers Cooperative Elevator (Marble Rock, Ia), Farmers' Coop Elevator (Laporte City, Ia), Farmers Coop Elevator (Manly, Ia), Shell Rock Elevator Company, Gilbertville Milling Company, Mount Auburn Grain Company, Vinton Coop, Rock Falls Grain Company, and Iowa Northern Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, Intervenor-Respondent
Id. at 42; accord American Trucking Ass'n v. ICC, 673 F.2d 82, 84 (5th 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Colacurcio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982); accord, United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
See United States v. Colacurcio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982); accord, United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983) 21 Appellants argue that the comments of another juror, Jo Anne Allen, also establish a basis for a mistrial on grounds of bias.
cited
Cited "see"
Packard Elevator v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Id. at 42; accord American Trucking Ass’n v. ICC, 673 F.2d 82, 84 (5th 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jude R. Hayes
(2×)
See United States v. Brock, 667 F.2d 1311, 1322 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1271 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) ("We do not agree with the Third Circuit's conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983). 27 We hold that the district court did not improperly consider disputed facts in deciding that military appearance regulations are nonreviewable.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. Melton, 689 F.2d 679, 683 (7th Cir.1982); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) (“We do not agree with the Third Circuit’s conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) (“We do not agree with the Third Circuit’s conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khalsa v. Weinberger
See Nieszner v. Mark, 684 F.2d 562, 564 (8th Cir.1982) ("We do not agree with the Third Circuit's conclusion that the Mindes analysis requires the court to consider the merits of a case in making a threshold determination of reviewability"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1273 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983). 25 We hold that the district court did not improperly consider disputed facts in deciding that military appearance regulations are nonreviewable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 929 (3d Cir.1982) (scheme to defraud employees of National Labor Relation Act not within mail fraud statute where Congress intended NLRA to be exclusive), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1022 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cortez
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cortez
See United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
North American Savings Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
See American Trucking Association v. ICC, 673 F.2d 82, 84 (5th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983); First National Bank v. Board of Governors, 509 F.2d 1004, 1008 (8th Cir.1975); Gage v. United States Atomic Energy Commission, 479 F.2d 1214, 1219 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
North American Savings Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
See American Trucking Association v. ICC, 673 F.2d 82, 84 (5th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983); First National Bank v. Board of Governors, 509 F.2d 1004, 1008 (8th Cir.1975); Gage v. United States Atomic Energy Commission, 479 F.2d 1214, 1219 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lamp
See American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. I.C.C., 659 F.2d 452, 458-9 (5th Cir.1981), opinion clarified (on other issues), 666 F.2d 167 , cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Rsr Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
See American Trucking Association, Inc. v. I.C.C., 673 F.2d 82, 85 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983) (Hobbs Act).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller and Co. v. United States
See generally American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. I.C.C., 673 F.2d 82 , 85 n. 4 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983) (judicial review available when non-party to agency proceeding attacks agency authori *1130 ty or constitutionality of agency’s enabling statute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 , 460 U.S. 1028 , 103 S.Ct. 1280 , 75 L.Ed.2d 501 (1983); cf. Hubbard v. United Airlines, 927 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir.1991) (examining conflicts between Railway Labor Act and RICO).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leslie Ray Cox R.M. Cox Larry Driver Barry Nichols John Bullard Robert W. Kennedy, Jr. Lorenzo G. East Clarence M. Pope, Jr. C.R. Altes Jack E. Merrymon Terry P. West R.S. Arnold M.W. Milstead J.W. Wade Manning A.C. Snider Terry H. Melvin Thomas E. Hill Gary D. Swann Ronald E. Frazier Anthony J. Crapet Robert M. Green Heath L. McMeans III Billy Carter Joe A. Knight, George Boglin, Wardell Clark, Phillip L. Drummond, Don L. Flurry, Dennis R. Fulton, Dennis E. Jones, W.T. Mayberry, James R. Miller, Willie J. Nation, Oscar Lee Perry, Robert Poole, Brack Wells, Willie Young, Harry S. Turner v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie and United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Usx Corporation, A/K/A United States Steel Corporation, Leslie Ray Cox, R.M. Cox, Larry Driver, Barry Nichols, John Bullard, Robert W. Kennedy, Jr., Lorenzo G. East, Clarence M. Pope, C.R. Altes, Jack E. Merrymon, Terry P. West, R.S. Arnold, M.W. Milstead, J.W. Wade, A.C. Snider, Terry H. Melvin, Thomas E. Hill, Gary D. Swann, Ronald E. Frazier, Anthony J. Crapet, Robert M. Green, Heath L. McMeans Iii, Billy Carter, Joe A. Knight, George Boglin, Wardell Clark, Phillip L. Drummond, Don L. Flurry, Dennis R. Fulton, Dennis E. Jones, W.T. Mayberry, James R. Miller, Willie J. Nation, Oscar Lee Perry, Robert Poole, Brack Wells, Willie Young, Harry S. Turner v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, Usx Corporation, A/K/A United States Steel Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that a reasonable jury could find that each monthly lease payment made to secure use of an automobile for a union official for four months constituted a separate predicate act under RICO), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 935-36 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that a reasonable jury could find that each monthly lease payment made to secure use of an automobile for a union official for four months constituted a separate predicate act under RICO), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Britt v. Grocers Supply Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union No. 6, 493 U.S. 67 , 110 S.Ct. 424, 919 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983), the issue was whether the doctrine of primary jurisdiction operated to displace a federal criminal statute that independently prohibited conduct that is also arguably prohibited by the NLRA.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Grain & Feed Association, Inc., and Great River Grain Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and United States Department of Labor, Food & Allied Service Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor
See, e.g., American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 669 F.2d 957, 960-61 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Grain & Feed Ass'n v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration
See, e.g., American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 669 F.2d 957, 960-61 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Runnels
See, e.g., United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 931 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983) (right of union members to honest and faithful services of union officials); United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 121 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983) (rights of citizens to have government conducted honestly and free from corruption and fraud); and United States v. Curry, 681 F.2d 406, 411 (5th Cir.1982) (chairman of citizens' political action organization owed a duty of faithful service to the committee…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rastelli
See also United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 930 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that deprivation of "economic benefits [employees] enjoyed through rights they had under the collective bargaining agreement[ ]" constituted property for purposes of the mail fraud statute and intimating that such a deprivation is a deprivation of a tangible property interest), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. S & Vee Cartage Co., 704 F.2d 914, 921 (6th Cir.) (corporation's scheme to defraud pension fund, welfare fund, and employees of contributions required under col…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rastelli
See also United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 930 (3d Cir.1982) (holding that deprivation of “economic benefits [employees] enjoyed through rights they had under the collective bargaining agreement[ ]” constituted property for purposes of the mail fraud statute and intimating that such a deprivation is a deprivation of a tangible property interest), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983); United States v. S & Vee Cartage Co., 704 F.2d 914, 921 (6th Cir.) (corporation’s scheme to defraud pension fund, welfare fund, and employees of contributions required und…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Whitty
See also United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 937 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leslie Craig Robertson, and Connie M. Steeprow
(2×)
Compare United States v. Brock, 667 F.2d 1311, 1322 (9th Cir.1982) (canister of methylamine contained beeper which indicated to officers its whereabouts in area to be searched), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1271 , 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983). 31 Certainly, such a rule violates the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 12 , 97 S.Ct. 2476, 2484 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977) and Sanders, 442 U.S. at 762 , 99 S.Ct. at 2592.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perlin v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Sundheimer v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission , 688 F.2d 150 (2d Cir. 1982) , cert. denied 460 U.S. 1022 (1983) ; United States v. Turkish , 623 F.2d 769 (2d Cir. 1980) , cert. denied 449 U.S. 1077 (1981) ; United States v. Siegel , 472 F. Supp. 440 ↩ (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard L. BRITT and Timothy Jackson, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs– v. The GROCERS SUPPLY COMPANY, INC
See, e.g., Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union No. 6, 493 U.S. 67 , 110 S.Ct. 424, 919 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022 , 103 S.Ct. 1272 , 75 L.Ed.2d 494 (1983), the issue was whether the doctrine of primary jurisdiction operated to displace a federal criminal statute that independently prohibited conduct that is also arguably prohibited by the NLRA.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brock
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-6922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.