green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Franklin
since the officers making the stop were acting upon orders from lieutenant yinger and the direction of agent duffy ... we must decide whether duffy's broadcast and yinger's order to stop the white lincoln meet the test of terry v. ohio.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eliezer Yehudah Neufeld
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that appellant’s own statement admitting act, even if mere puffery, is sufficient to justify a jury finding that he committed the act for purposes of Rule 404(b).)” Calderon, 127 F.3d at 1332 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alberto Calderon
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that appellant’s own statement admitting act, even if mere puffery, is sufficient to justify a jury finding that he committed the act for purposes of Rule 404(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calderon
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that appellant's own statement admitting act, even if mere puffery, is sufficient to justify a jury finding that he committed the act for purposes of Rule 404(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Russell
(2×)
See United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 410 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 (1983); Graham, at 428-29.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eleazar Garcia
See United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 413 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that where a challenge to the validity of a prior conviction was barred by § 851(e), the district court’s failure to inform the defendant of the timing of a challenge did not require a remand for resentencing); see also United States v. Weaver, 905 F.2d 1466, 1482 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 972 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1991) (where § 851(e) bars challenge to prior conviction, failure to comply with warning requirement of § 851(b) …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vickie J. Wylie
(2×)
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984). 64 Even if, arguendo, Wylie had not waived this issue, she would be unable to prove that the alleged time pressures on certain jurors constituted "a significant risk of prejudice." United States v. Patterson, 648 F.2d 625, 629 (9th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter R. Farrell and Paul A. Farrell
Evid. 103(a)(1) and (d); see United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1281-82 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Michael Stubbins
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Earl Davis
See United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 410 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that for bolstering to constitute plain error, the prosecutor must intertwine “his personal and official credibility with the credibility of the witnesses”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. State
See Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983), disapproved in part on other grounds, Williams v. State, 488 So.2d 62 (Fla.1986); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31 , 102 S.Ct. 2211 , 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Hooks v. State, 462 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. State
See Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1982), cert, denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983), disapproved in part on other grounds, Williams v. State, 488 So.2d 62 (Fla.1986); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981); aff'd, 457 U.S. 31 , 102 S.Ct. 2211 , 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ross v. State
See Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. State
See Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521, 525 (Fla. 1982) (Overton, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983). [3] The nature of the deadlock instruction at issue in Sayan cannot be determined from a reading of the opinion in that case. [4] The cases discussing this issue can be divided into three groups: (1) cases in which the error of a coercive charge was preserved by objection, see, e.g., Nelson v. State, 438 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Lee v. State, 239 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 240 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1970); (2)…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Charles Levay
See also United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 411-12 (5th Cir.1982) (dicta), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Neal v. Commonwealth
See also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1281 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bailey
See also United States v. Mobley, 699 F.2d 172, 174-75 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (stop made pursuant to order by police superior only lawful where the superior had sufficient facts to justify the stop); United States v. Robinson, 536 F.2d 1298, 1299 (9th Cir.1976) (if dispatcher did not have just cause, he could not create justification by relaying the information to another officer); People v. Hazelhurst, 662 P.2d 1081, 1085 (Colo.1983) (stop at request of other officers lawful only upon showing of reasonable suspicion in officers making t…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas H. Taylor, Jr., A/K/A Seifullah Rahman, United States of America v. Vernon A. Collins, A/K/A Bey Brother
See also United States v. Mobley, 699 F.2d 172, 174-76 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 -84, 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Oberlander
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280-81 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bolinger
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury’s impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome McTeer Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente, (Two Cases)
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury's impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown). 7 Although the June 10 telephone call did not disclose the full extent of Hunter's misconduct, 2 enough …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramseur
(2×)
See, e.g., Rose v. State, 425 So. 2d 521, 525 (Fla.) (holding that trial court commits reversible error in giving Allen -type charge during penalty phase of capital trial), cert. den., 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed. 2d 812 (1983); Legare v. State, 250 Ga. 875 , 302 S.E. 2d 351, 353 (1983) (same); see also State v. Williams, supra, 392 So. 2d at 635 (trial court's failure to inform jury of its ability to return final non-unanimous verdict "must be held to have been prejudicial").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren v. State
See, e.g., Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1983); Spaziano v. State, 393 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1981), aff'd, 468 U.S. 447 , 104 S.Ct. 3154 , 82 L.Ed.2d 340 (1984); Gardner v. State, 405 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Peak v. State, 363 So.2d 1166 *476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 460 (Fla.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 970 , 100 S.Ct. 642 , 62 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bollinger
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury’s impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome McTeer Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Johnny Dean Hall, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Oscar Cruz-Barrientos, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury's impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown). 16 In this case, not only did de la Fuente fail to offer the requisite evidence of timeliness, it is cle…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morgan v. State
Next, I cannot agree with the district court decisions, some of which are relied upon by the majority, see, e.g., Curtis v. State, 455 So.2d 1090 ; Villavicencio v. State, 449 So.2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 1984); State v. Prieto, 439 So.2d 288, 290 (Ferguson, J., concurring); see also Meek v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (Case Nos. 83-1131 and 83-1165, opinion filed January 4, 1985) ( Hitchcock and Rose "support" conclusion that Ivory does not mandate reversal, where defendant "acquiesced without objection" to challenged communication outside of his presence and alle…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Herman v. State
See also Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Wyatt
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1652, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,222 Royston E. Potter v. Murray City, a Municipal Corporation, Calvin G. Gillen, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police of Murray City, Murray City Civil Service Commission, the Honorable Scott M. Metheson, as Governor of the State of Utah, the Honorable David L. Wilkinson, as Attorney General of the State of Utah, the State of Utah and the United States of America
E.g., Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574, 603 , 103 S.Ct. 2017, 2034-35 , 76 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 257 , 102 S.Ct. 1051, 1055 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982); see also United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 772 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 and 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983); United States v. Carroll, 567 F.2d 955, 957 (10th Cir.1977) (per curiam). 7 15 We are in agreement with the district court that the State of Utah 16 beyond the declaration of policy and public interest implici…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Potter v. Murray City
E.g., Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574, 603 , 103 S.Ct. 2017, 2034-35 , 76 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983); United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 257 , 102 S.Ct. 1051, 1055 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982); see also United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 772 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 and 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983); United States v. Carroll, 567 F.2d 955, 957 (10th Cir.1977) (per curiam). 7 We are in agreement with the district court that the State of Utah beyond the declaration of policy and public interest implicit in t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rush v. State
Compare Rose v. State, Fla.Supr., 425 So.2d 521 , cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983). 14 In view of the unequivocal announcement that the jury was unable to reach unanimous agreement as to the death sentence, we hold that, under all of the circumstances, such announcement constituted, by necessary implication, a verdict having the same force and effect as a written “No” answer to Interrogatory No. 2. * * * * Accordingly, we conclude that the several convictions of the defendant stand affirmed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lincoln v. State
See also Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ring
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 82-6359.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Missouri (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.