green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Wessmann Ex Rel. Wessmann v. Boston School Committee
Accord United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1076 (6th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); Rosquist v. Soo Line R.R., 692 F.2d 1107 ,1112 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleon Brown
See United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1076-1077 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 (1983) (members of a conspiracy are guilty of transporting explosives across state lines even though an undercover federal agent carried the actual explosives).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wallace v. State
(2×)
See Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086, 1094 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983) (Noting petitioner steadfastly maintained that he did not want anyone to testify on his behalf and refused to identify any witnesses; court said the refusal did not negate the attorney's duty to investigate, but added "the scope of that duty was limited by Gray's refusal"); see also Hamblen v. State, 527 So.2d 800, 804 (Fla. 1988) ("there is no power that could have compelled [a defendant] to cooperate and divulge such information.").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darius W. Hober
See, United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1074-76 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 (1983); United States v. Barger, 931 F.2d 359, 363 (6th Cir.1991). 38 The Supreme Court has been similarly reticent to find outrageousness.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
See United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); United States v. Johnson, 855 F.2d 299, 305 (6th Cir.1988); United States v. Edgecomb, 910 F.2d 1309, 1312 (6th Cir.1990). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hancock v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division
CRE 103(a)(1); see Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir.1982) (hearsay claim not considered on appeal because it was not raised before the trial court), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983); People v. Watson, 668 P.2d 965 (Colo.App.1983) (failure to object in the trial court on the grounds asserted on appeal is deemed a waiver of the objection).
cited
Cited "see"
Streetman v. McCotter
See Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086, 1102 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmy C. Wingo v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
See Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Liefer, George Sharos, and Charles Patterson
See United States v. Metcalfe, 698 F.2d 877, 883 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JACK NOVOSELSKY
See Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086, 1102 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
Recognizing this fact, we have in the past “refuse[d] to extend the rule of Massiah and Henry to situations where an individual, acting on his own initiative, deliberately elicits incriminating information. ” United States v. Malik, 680 F.2d 1162, 1165 (7th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Metcalfe, 698 F.2d 877, 882 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); People v. Isaacson, supra, 406 N.Y.S.2d at 719, 378 N.E.2d at 83 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas York
Recognizing this fact, we have in the past “refuse[d] to extend the rule of Massiah and Henry to situations where an individual, acting on his own initiative, deliberately elicits incriminating information.” United States v. Malik, 680 F.2d 1162, 1165 (7th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Metcalfe, 698 F.2d 877, 882 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Davis
(2×)
See also Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983) (court holds that Mississippi's construction of the term "under a sentence of imprisonment" to include parolees not unconstitutionally vague). [17] Further, we observe that the legislature in section 16-11-103(6)(h) established as a separate aggravator that "[t]he class 1 felony was committed for pecuniary gain." [18] For example, see the following state provisions: Alabama, ALA.CODE § 13A-5-40(a)(7) (Repl.1982 & Supp.1989) ("[m]urder done for a pecuniary or other valuabl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Isaac Camacho v. Autoridad De Telefonos De Puerto Rico
See, e.g., United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1076 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983) (judge’s expressed opposition to racism of Ku Klux Klan and Nazi Party does not necessitate disqualification notwithstanding that defendants are members of such groups); Rosquist v. Soo Line R.R., 692 F.2d 1107 , 1112 (7th Cir.1982) (judge’s earlier writings on contingent fees do not preclude involve *492 ment in case concerning settlement which includes contingent fee); Sidarma Societa Italiana di Armamento S.p.A. v. Holt Marine Industries, 515 F.Supp. 13…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Anderson
See, e.g., Gray v. Lucas (5th Cir. 1982) 677 F.2d 1086, 1103 , certiorari denied (1983) 461 U.S. 910 [ 76 L.Ed.2d 815 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 ]; see also Model Penal Code and Commentaries, sections 210.2, 210.6, pages 13-43, 107-171 (generally permitting the death penalty for unintentional felony murders while not permitting it for some intentional murders).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
The test for whether recusal is required by the federal statute is what a “reasonable person knowing all the relevant facts would think about the impartiality of the judge.” Roberts v. Bailar, 625 F.2d 125, 129 (6th Cir.1980); see also United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1076 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); Hall v. Small Business Admin., 695 F.2d 175, 179 (5th Cir.1983) (“reasonable person, knowing all the circumstances, would harbor doubts about his impartiality”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Jerome Sumpter
See also United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sam Qaoud Evan H. Callanan, Sr. Evan H. Callanan, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); Brown, supra; see also Robinson, supra. The key factual points emphasized by the government are 1) that it did not know of or encourage Judeh’s commission of a sex *1111 crime and 2) did not provide him with kickback money on this occasion.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James Nealy v. Donald A. Cabana, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary
See also Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086, 1093 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy Griffith (82-1485), Gerald L. McKay (82-1495), Frank Ross Reynolds, III (82-1496)
See, e.g., United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1076 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983) (juror received threatening phone call; standard is whether outside contact “appreciably swayed” the jury); United States v. Worthington, 698 F.2d 820, 826 (6th Cir.1983) (juror read news article on defendant’s potential sentence; standard is whether prejudice resulted); United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 , 74 L.Ed.2d 638 (1982) (juror read Reader’s Digest article on the relevant law; standard…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-Cota
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); United States v. Leja, 563 F.2d 244 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074 , 98 S.Ct. 1263 , 55 L.Ed.2d 789 (1978); United States v. Eddings, 478 F.2d 67 (6th Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gutierrez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-6467.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1983.
Cited by 63 opinions | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.