Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 461 U.S. 938 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 461 U.S. 938 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
106 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. Deerman (alacivapp, 1998-04-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Williams v. Deerman
Ala. Civ. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. Martin , 425 So.2d 415 , 424 (Ala. 1982), cert. denied , 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
cited Cited "see" In Re James Constant, Debtor. James Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 (1983) and rev'd on other grounds, 466 U.S. 558 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Arthur Cary Pryor, A/K/A Camden M. Peller
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); cf. In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 389 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" Rodriguez v. United States of
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ronwin v. ___ ______ State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir. 1982), ______________________ cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 (1983); cf. In re Union Leader ____________ __ ____________________ Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 389 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. _____ ____________ 927 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Computer & Communications Industry Ass’n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 (D.C.Cir.1982) (affirming Computer II), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 ; Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 740 F.2d 465 (7th Cir.1984) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Order), North American Telecommunications Ass’n v. FCC, 772 F.2d 1282 (7th Cir.1985) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Reconsideration ).
discussed Cited "see" Illinois Bell Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 (D.C.Cir.1982) (affirming Computer II ), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 ; Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 740 F.2d 465 (7th Cir.1984) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Order ); North American Telecommunications Ass'n v. FCC, 772 F.2d 1282 (7th Cir.1985) (affirming BOC Separate Subsidiary Reconsideration ). 18 Soon after "modified" separation requirements were imposed on the divested BOCs, a number of the BOCs, including Ameritech, petitioned the Commission to allow their CPE subsidiaries to mar…
discussed Cited "see" New York State Commission on Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Computer and Communications Industry Ass’n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 217 (D.C.Cir.1982) (refusing to engage in a debate about the wisdom of relying on market forces, given that that choice of policy was within the statutory mandate and not arbitrary or capricious), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983). 13 D.- Procedural Objections .
discussed Cited "see" New York State Commission On Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Computer and Communications Industry Ass'n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 217 (D.C.Cir.1982) (refusing to engage in a debate about the wisdom of relying on market forces, given that that choice of policy was within the statutory mandate and not arbitrary or capricious), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983). 13 D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against King
Wash. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Pryor, 960 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1992) (“It cannot be that an automatic recusal can be obtained by the simple act of suing the judge.” (citing Ronwin v. State Bar of Ariz., 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 (1983))).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against King
Wash. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Pryor, 960 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1992) ("It cannot be that an automatic recusal can be obtained by the simple act of suing the judge.") (citing Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Federal Trade Commission v. Verity International, Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Computer & Comm. Ind. Ass’n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 , 209 n. 59 (D.C.Cir.1982) (using term "common carrier” to "indicate not an entity but rather an activity as to which an entity is a common carrier”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); Nat’l Ass’n of Regulatory Util.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Adams v. Robertson
Ala. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. Martin, 425 So.2d 415 (Ala.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 [ 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 ] (1983); Penson v. Terminal Transport Company, 634 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1981); Nottingham Partners v. Dana, 564 A.2d 1089 (Del.1989); Kincade v. General Tire & Rubber Co., 635 F.2d 501, 502-08 (5th Cir.1981); Nottingham Partners v. Trans-Lux Corp., 925 F.2d 29, 31-32 (1st Cir.1991); Robinson v. Lorrilard [Lorillard] Corp., 444 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.1971).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Western Union International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Communications Satellite Corporation, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., International Relay, Inc., Trt Telecommunications Corporation, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Intervenors. Rca Global Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Hawaiian Telephone Company, Intervenors. Itt World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, International Relay, Inc., Intervenors. Itt World Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Communications Satellite Corporation, Rca Global Communications, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Sin, Inc., Dow Jones and Company, Inc., Intervenors. MCI International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Communications Satellite Corporation, Rca Global Communications, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Sin, Inc., Dow Jones and Company, Inc., Intervenors. Fedex International Transmission Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Sin, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Communications Satellite Corporation, Intervenors. MCI International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Sin, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Communications Satellite Corporation, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Computer & Communications Industry Association v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 212 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Western Union International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Computer & Communications Industry Association v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 212 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc. v. Public Utilities Commission of Maine
1st Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Computer & Communications Industry Association v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198, 214-18 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2109 , 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louisiana Public Service Commission
v.
Federal Communications Commission and National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 82-1331; No. 82-1352.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1983.
461 U.S. 938
Blackmun, Consideration, Motions, Petitions, Took.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motions of Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Florida Public Service Commission, South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs, and Utah Public Service Commission for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of Arkansas et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 82-1331 granted. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and these petitions.

Reported below: 224 U. S. App. D. C. 83, 693 F. 2d 198.