green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Cary Pryor, A/K/A Camden M. Peller
See Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); cf. In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 389 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Denard Brooks, United States of America v. Johnny X. Williamson, United States of America v. Melvin Eugene Flint, United States of America v. Charles Russell Ford, United States of America v. Linda Mitchell Peay
See Folston v. Allsbrook, 691 F.2d 184, 187 (4th Cir.1982) ("Where the incriminating admissions of the nontestifying codefendant are admissible against th[e] defendant under the rules of evidence, Bruton is inapplicable."), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983). 8 The district court, therefore, did not abuse its discretion in denying Peay's severance motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brooks
See Folston v. Allsbrook, 691 F.2d 184, 187 (4th Cir.1982) (“Where the incriminating admissions of the nontestifying codefendant are admissible against th[e] defendant under the rules of evidence, Bruton is inapplicable.”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983). 8 The district court, thérefore, did not abuse its discretion in denying Peay’s severance motion.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Keith Disbrow
See Folston v. Allsbrook, 691 F.2d 184, 187 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Magill v. State
See Aldridge v. State, 425 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 315 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See Bolender v. State, 422 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 315 (1983) (fact that victims were armed dealers in illegal drugs was not a valid ground of mitigation supporting life recommendation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blohm
See Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692 , 700-01 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983); United States v. Grismore, 564 F.2d 929, 933 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 954 , 98 S.Ct. 1586 , 55 L.Ed.2d 806 (1978); United States v. Bray, 546 F.2d 851, 857-59 (10th Cir. 1976) (failure to recuse upheld where plaintiff stated, inter alia, that he had filed a brief with the court accusing the judge of bribery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice); United States v. Alberico, 453 F.Supp. 178, 187 (D.Colo.1977) (no disqualification where plaint…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against King
See, e.g., United States v. Pryor, 960 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1992) ("It cannot be that an automatic recusal can be obtained by the simple act of suing the judge.") (citing Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 701 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 938 , 103 S.Ct. 2110 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christian v. State
Compare Bolender v. State, 422 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1982) (the victims' being armed cocaine dealers does not justify robbing, torturing, kidnapping, and murdering them), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 315 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. Wainwright
(2×)
Aldridge v. State, 402 So.2d 607 (Fla.1981); see also Aldridge v. State, 425 So.2d 1132, 1136 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 315 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Newby Franklin Love, United States of America v. Newby Franklin Love, United States of America v. Robert Edward Lee, United States of America v. Sue Robinson Youngblood, United States of America v. Robert Edward Lee
However, the Court has subsequently refined its rule in Doyle to permit testimony concerning a defendant's silence where the defendant has not "received any Miranda warnings during the period in which he remained silent immediately after his arrest." Fletcher v. Weir, 455 U.S. 603 , 102 S.Ct. 1309 , 71 L.Ed.2d 490 (1982); see also Folston v. Allsbrook, 691 F.2d 184, 187 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Love
However, the Court has subsequently refined its rule in Doyle to permit testimony concerning a defendant’s silence where the defendant has not “received any Miranda warnings during the period in which he remained silent immediately after his arrest.” Fletcher v. Weir, 455 U.S. 603 , 102 S.Ct. 1309 , 71 L.Ed.2d 490 (1982); see also Folston v. Allsbrook, 691 F.2d 184, 187 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bates v. State
See, e.g., Bolender v. State, 422 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 315 (1983); Martin v. State, 420 So.2d 583 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 1508 , 75 L.Ed.2d 937 (1983); Jones v. State, 411 So.2d 165 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 891 , 103 S.Ct. 189 , 74 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blume
v.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
v.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
No. 82-1606.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1983.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice and Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.