green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Graves v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The ruling that is before us on this appeal is that of Judge Wagner. [4] See, e.g., Reese v. United States, 467 A.2d 152, 159 (D.C.1983); Williams v. United States, 421 A.2d 19, 26 (D.C.1980); Branch v. United States, 372 A.2d 998, 1000 (D.C.1977). [5] See, e.g., Tribble v. United States, 447 A.2d 766, 768 (D.C.1982); Shreeves v. United States, 395 A.2d 774, 783 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 943 , 99 S.Ct. 2161 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1979); United States v. Bolden, 381 A.2d 624, 627 (D.C. 1977); but see Reed v. United States, 383 A.2d 316, 318-19 (D.C.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 871 , 99 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Harold Friedman
The standard of judgment for the district court determination is set forth in United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983). 5 [T]he defendant must show that the evidence (1) was discovered only after trial, (2) could not have been discovered earlier with due diligence, (3) is material and not merely cumulative or impeaching, and (4) would likely produce an acquittal if the case were retried. 6 Id. at 966.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Robert Van Horn
On the other hand, if the evidence goes to a coUateral matter or is circumstantial or cumulative evidence, we believe that the other factors need not be as strong." Id. at 962-63. 10 We do not consider the factors relied upon by Van Horn in contending that the "circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness" were not meant to be persuasive.
discussed
Cited "see"
1900 Highway 190, L.L.C. v. City of Slidell
See ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston County, 380 S.C. 191, 197-98 , 669 S.E.2d 337 (South Carolina 2008) (citing Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., 693 F.2d 733 , 747 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (applying Missouri | slaw, the court held “[c]ompetitive disadvantage alone does not give rise to standing!)]”); Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Fairbanks N. Star Borough, 865 P.2d 741, 745 (Alaska 1993) (“[W]e thus adopt the majority rule and deny standing to a business competitor whose only alleged injury results from …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fields
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 283-284 (C.A.4 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sua
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 286 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 [ 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 2124, 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 ] (1983); United States v. Garner, 574 F.2d 1141, 1144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Foster, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 962 (6th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983); United States v. Clarke, 2 F.3d 81, 84 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1166 , 114 S.Ct. 1194 , 127 L.Ed.2d 544 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHan
(2×)
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 286 .(4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 2124, 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); United States v. Garner, 574 F.2d 1141, 1144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McHan
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F.2d 282, 286 (4th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983); United States v. Garner, 574 F.2d 1141, 1144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 600 (D.C.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
(2×)
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 600 (D.C. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Express Services, Inc. v. City Of Kansas City, Missouri
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 747 (8th Cir.1982) (looking to state law to decide whether plaintiff had standing to raise state claim in federal court), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); City of Moore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 699 F.2d 507, 511 (10th Cir.1983) (stating that state law determines who has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute on the ground that it violates state constitution); Owen of Ga., Inc. v. Shelby County, 648 F.2d 1084, 1088-90 (6th Cir.1981) (applying state law to d…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. King
See United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 87-90 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Express Services, Inc. v. City of Kansas City
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 747 (8th Cir.1982) (looking to state law to decide whether plaintiff had standing to raise state claim in federal court), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); City of Moore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 699 F.2d 507, 511 (10th Cir.1983) (stating that state law determines who has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute on the ground that it violates state constitution); Owen of Ga., Inc. v. Shelby County, 648 F.2d 1084, 1088-90 (6th Cir.1981) (applying state law to d…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Marlowe Chambers, AKA Larry Chambers, AKA Marlowe Chambers
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. United States
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 607-08 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alt
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954 , 957 n. 1 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983) (noting that overwhelming evidence can make an error harmless under Rule 52(a)); 3A Charles A. Wright; Federal Practice and Procedure § 854, at 305-11 (2d ed. 1982 & Supp.1992) (noting that weight of the evidence against a defendant is crucial factor in harmless error analysis).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Jacob Alt
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954 , 957 n. 1 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983) (noting that overwhelming evidence can make an error harmless under Rule 52(a)); 3A Charles A. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 854, at 305-11 (2d ed. 1982 & Supp.1992) (noting that weight of the evidence against a defendant is crucial factor in harmless error analysis).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William D. Zack
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian Cashin (91-2303), Barry Cashin (91-2329)
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Markiewicz
See United States v. Javino, 960 F.2d 1137, 1141 (2d Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 87-88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983); United States v. De Marco, 488 F.2d 828, 832 (2d Cir.1973)), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Sept. 21, 1992) (No. 92-6074).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Duane Markiewicz
See United States v. Javino, 960 F.2d 1137, 1141 (2d Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 87-88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983); United States v. De Marco, 488 F.2d 828, 832 (2d Cir.1973)), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Sept. 21, 1992) (No. 92-6074). 136 If the district court omitted an element but the evidence was sufficient to prove that element beyond a reasonable doubt, "the appropriate remedy is vacation of the conviction and remand for a new trial." Javino, 960 F.2d at 1141 (citing United States v. Londono-Villa, 930 F.…
cited
Cited "see"
Stock v. Arnott
See Medve v. Walakovits, 305 Pa.Super. 75 , 451 A.2d 249 (1982), cert. denied, Orloski v. Mellenberg, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunter v. United States
(2×)
See Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 613 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James E. Campbell
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983). 17 The district court correctly noted that in order to grant a new trial, the moving party must show that the evidence (1) was discovered after trial; (2) could not have been discovered earlier with diligence; (3) is material and not merely cumulative or impeaching; and (4) would likely produce an acquittal if the case was retried.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James J. Rumler
II. 31 Motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence are disfavored, and a trial court's determination that a new trial is not warranted will not be reversed absent "clear abuse of discretion." United States v. Allen, 748 F.2d 334, 337 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); see United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 (1983). 32 The following elements must be established before a new trial will be granted: (1) the new evidence was discovered after the trial; (2) the evidence could not have been discovered earlier with due diligence; (3) the evide…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Mokol
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 962 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golsun v. United States
If it did, “then, viewing the comments in context, we must consider the gravity of the misconduct, its relationship to the issue of guilt, the effect of any corrective action by the trial judge, and the strength of the government’s case.” Irick v. United States, 565 A.2d 26, 32 (D.C.1989) (citation omitted); see Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 611-12 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Oberndorf v. City & County of Denver
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Oberndorf v. City And County Of Denver
See Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher
See United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983); see also United States v. Williams, 809 F.2d 1072, 1093-94 , modified in different part, 828 F.2d 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 228 , 98 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987); United States v. Qaoud, 777 F.2d 1105, 1115 (6th Cir.1985) (citing Mazzei), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1499 , 89 L.Ed.2d 899 (1986); United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302, 1310-11 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1110 , 105 S.Ct. 790 , 83 L.Ed.2d 783 (1984); United States v.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Owens
(2×)
See United States v. Murphy, 696 F. 2d 282, 283-284 (CA4 1982), cert. denied, 461 U. S. 945 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Wayne Woolbright
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 964-65 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983) (citing Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 88-89 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 219-20 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970)); United States v. West, 574 F.2d 1131, 1137-38 (4th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
The exception, in this limited sense, is inapplicable to defendants’ activity — plaintiffs cannot seriously contend that defendants offered jobs to legislators in order to directly harm plaintiff, and that defendants had no interest in the pending legislation in Congress. *410 However, several courts have also held that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine was not “intended to protect those who employ illegal means to influence their representatives in government.” Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Chauffers, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 150, 440 F.2d 1096 , 1099 (9th Cir.1971); see Centr…
cited
Cited "see"
GLM CORP. v. Klein
See United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Lee Hatfield
See United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Jim Forno's Continental Motors, Inc. v. Subaru Distributors Corp.
See United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul O'Dell
A. Motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence are disfavored, and a trial court’s determination that a new trial is not warranted will not be reversed absent “clear abuse of discretion.” United States v. Allen, 748 F.2d 334, 337 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); see United States v. Barlow, 693 F.2d 954, 966 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San Mateo
See Sun Valley Disposal Co. v. Silver State Disposal Co., 420 F.2d 341, 342-43 (9th Cir.1969) (Noerr and Pennington have “eroded the authority of Harman”)) Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); Metro-Cable Co. v. CATV of Rockford, Inc., 516 F.2d 220, 229-30 (7th Cir.1975) (“such a rule would in practice abrogate the Noerr doctrine”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colony at Holbrook, Inc. v. Strata G.C., Inc.
Although the existence of a RICO “enterprise” and a “pattern of racketeering” activity are two separate elements, Turkette, 452 U.S. at 583 , 101 S.Ct. at 2528-29 , the Second Circuit has relied on the Supreme Court’s recognition that the “proof used to establish these separate elements may in a particular cases coalesce____” Id. at 583 , 101 S.Ct. at 2528-29 ; see also United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.) (holding that it is not necessary “that proof of these separate elements be distinct and independent, as long as the proof offered is sufficient to satisfy both…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. Juneau Empire
Co., 248 Kan. 469 , 807 P.2d 71, 78 (1991); Wheeler v. Green, 286 Or. 99 , 593 P.2d 777 , 785 n. 7 (1979) (holding that public figure status is a question for the court when the facts are undisputed); see also Williams v. Pasma, 202 Mont. 66 , 656 P.2d 212, 214-15 (1982) (repudiating earlier Montana authority that had held public figure status to present a jury question under state constitution), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. United States
(2×)
Compare Scull, 564 A.2d at 1166 (applying Chapman test in assessing denial of any opportunity to cross-examine key government witnesses for bias) and Bassil, 517 A.2d at 716-17 (applying Chapman test to exclusion of all defense testimony as to bad reputation of government witness for truth and veracity) with Roundtree v. United States, 581 A.2d 315 , 328 & 329 n. 34 (D.C.1990) (applying Kotteakos test to ruling excluding as irrelevant evidence concerning condition of alleged rape victim’s genitalia) and Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591 , 610 & n. 37 (D.C.1982) (applying Kotteakos test to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. United States
See Allen, 603 A.2d at 1225-26 ; see also Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 614 (D.C.1981), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983); Arnold, supra, 511 A.2d at 416; Sherrod v. United States, 478 A.2d 644, 654 (D.C.1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dale R. Javino
See, e.g., United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 87-88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983); United States v. De Marco, 488 F.2d 828, 832 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Coonan
Common sense suggests that the existence of an association-in-fact is oftentimes more readily proven by “what it does, rather than by abstract analysis of its structure.” Bagaric, 706 F.2d at 56 (emphasis in original); see, e.g., United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 88-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Coonan
Common sense suggests that the existence of an association-in-fact is oftentimes more readily proven by "what it does, rather than by abstract analysis of its structure." Bagaric, 706 F.2d at 56 (emphasis in original); see, e.g., United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85, 88-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of Lawrence
Compare Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 945, 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (circumstantial evidence of illegal or fraudulent actions deprived defendants of state action immunity) with Scott, 736 F.2d at 1215 (absent allegation of bribery or other illegal acts, council may invoke state action immunity doctrine upon a proper showing of authorization).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 89-3082
Compare Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983) (circumstantial evidence of illegal or fraudulent actions deprived defendants of state action immunity) with Scott, 736 F.2d at 1215 (absent allegation of bribery or other illegal acts, council may invoke state action immunity doctrine upon a proper showing of authorization).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cheek
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mazzei, 700 F2d 85 (2d Cir), cert den 461 US 945 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hughes
See, e.g., United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983); United States v. Qaoud, 777 F.2d 1105 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied sub. nom, Callanan v. United States, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1499 , 89 L.Ed.2d 899 (1986); United States v. Cagnina, 697 F.2d 915 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 856 , 104 S.Ct. 175 , 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983); United States v. Perholtz; United States v. Diecidue, 603 F.2d 535 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 781 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Pasma
v.
Pasma
No. 82-1640.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1983.
Published
Sup. Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied.