green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“dog's designation of the luggage" established probable cause to arrest where "he testimony indicated that the dog kane had a record of 100 percent accuracy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Virgil Cook
dog's designation of the luggage" established probable cause to arrest where "he testimony indicated that the dog kane had a record of 100 percent accuracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bermudez
See United States v. Frankenberry, 696 F.2d 239, 242 (3d Cir. 1982) (evidence of witness’ participation in witness protection program proper when prosecution ‘‘does not exploit any inference of threat from the defendant’’), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S. Ct. 3544 , 77 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Gonzalez-Garcia
See United States v. Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 709 (9th Cir.1982) (stating that after evidence of prior bad acts is admitted under Rule 404(b), it is important to caution the jury why the evidence was admitted because limiting instructions can reduce or eliminate prejudice which would otherwise occur), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 (1983). 16 Garcia argues that the prior acts are too dissimilar to the act for which he was prosecuted to be relevant to show knowledge because the prior acts took place at night and he was prosecuted for an act that took place in broad daylight.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parnell Seaton v. John Jabe
See Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 950 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 (1983). 64 As to his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to obtain a copy of the transcript of the Wade hearing in the Scott case, we note that petitioner represented himself in that hearing and that he most likely received a copy of the transcript.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Delores Homick, United States of America v. Charles Dietz
See United States v. Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 709 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3543 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Murphy
See Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1038 , 106 S.Ct. 606 , 88 L.Ed.2d 584 (1985), reh’g denied, 475 U.S. 1040 , 106 S.Ct. 1252 , 89 L.Ed.2d 359 (1986); Fleenor v. State, 514 N. E.2d 80 (Ind.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 872 , 109 S.Ct. 189 , 102 L.Ed.2d 158 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Heroel Hernandez
See United States v. Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 710 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scarfo
See United States v. Frankenberry, 696 F.2d 239, 242-43 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983) (testimony that a witness is in the Witness Security Program and has received substantial benefit may be elicited during direct examination to counter defense suggestions that his testimony is biased).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Meese
See United States v. Greene, 697 F.2d 1229, 1235 (5th Cir.) (discussing deference to executive), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3542 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Meese
See United States v. Greene, 697 F.2d 1229, 1235 (5th Cir.) (discussing deference to executive), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3542 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983). 33 Yet, from the early times of our constitutional system courts have recognized that the executive is not above review in the conduct of responsibilities constitutionally committed to it.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Abraham Ceballos and Efrain Adames
(2×)
See United States v. Waltzer, 682 F.2d 370 , 371 n. 2 (2d Cir.1982) (noting that for purposes of reviewing the denial of a suppression motion, the evidence must be viewed in the light, most favorable to the Government), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3543 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Evan Callanan, Jr. Evan Callanan, Sr.
(2×)
See United States v. Finazzo, 704 F.2d 300, 305 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3543 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zuluaga
See United States v. Varella, 692 F.2d 1352, 1356 (11th Cir. 1982) (disclosure of identity not required where informant is only a tipster, not an active participant in the crime, even if he is present during a critical transaction), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3542 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Brown
See Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 951 (11th Cir.) ("unquestionably inflammatory" evidence accurately depicting scene of murder admissible), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983), overruled on other grounds, Brooks v. Kemp, 762 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Brown
See Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 951 (11th Cir.) (“unquestionably inflammatory” evidence accurately depicting scene of murder admissible), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983), overruled on other grounds, Brooks v. Kemp, 762 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir. 1985) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Claret Echeverry
United States v. O’Connor, 737 F.2d 814 , 819 (9th Cir.1984); accord United States v. Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 708 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3543 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salvador Lacayo, Jr.
See Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 951 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Arizona v. Michael Andrew Elmer
“Furthermore, even when all of the other requirements of ‘extrinsic acts’ evidence are met, the evidence may be accepted only if, on balance, its probative value is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant.” Id.; accord Robertson, 1 5 F.3d at 869-70; United States v. Ramirez-Jiminez, 967 F.2d 1321, 1325 (9th Cir.1992); see also Fed.R.Evid. 403. 4 The State argues that the district court applied the incorrect standard because it concluded the evidence was “extremely prejudicial,” not “unfairly prejudicial.” We do not “require a mechanical…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Devier v. Zant
See, e.g., Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 947 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sheffield v. State
See also, Stahl v. State , 426 So.2d 909 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982), writ quashed, 426 So.2d 917 (Ala. 1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory Burris
Neither "do we require ... where there are numerous similar previous incidents, that the trial judge separately balance on the record the probative value against the prejudice that might arise from the mention of each individual incident." Id.; see also United States v. Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 709 (9th Cir.1982) (upholding the district court's admission of evidence despite its failure to articulate clearly the Rule 403 balancing), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sanchez
Conn. 1973); see also United States v. Varella, 692 F.2d 1352, 1355 (11th Cir. 1982) (cross examination could be limited where informants were witnesses but not integral participants), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 464 U.S. 838 (1983); accord, State v. Zamora, 534 So. 2d 864, 870 (Fla. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Albert Gillespie
See, e.g., United States v. Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 709 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3543 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1392 (1983) (evidence of sexual and drug activity admissible motive evidence in kidnapping case to show defendant intended to perform same sexual acts with victim); United States v. Potter, 616 F.2d 384, 387-89 (9th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 832 , 101 S.Ct. 101 , 66 L.Ed.2d 37 (1980) (evidence of sexual relations with patients admissible on motive and intent issues in prosecution of doctor for unlawfully prescribing drugs in return for sexual favors); Umbau…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. Wainwright
(2×)
See also Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940 , 950 n. 6 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983), overruled on other grounds in Brooks v. Kemp, 762 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Gaither
See also, Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 947 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Wainwright
See also Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 948 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Arnold
In determining whether a trial court should have invoked the procedures of CPL article 730 and directed an examination and hearing on defendant’s competency, the focus is on what the trial court did in light of what it knew or should have known of the defendant at any time before final judgment (see, Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375, 385 , supra; People v Armlin, supra, p 171 ; People v Harris, 109 AD2d 351, 355 , supra; see also, Hance v Zant, 696 F2d 940, 948, cert denied 463 US 1210 ; Lokos v Capps, 625 F2d 1258, 1261; Reese v Wainwright, 600 F2d 1085, 1093, cert denied 444 US 983 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Greene
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1941.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.