green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Fugate v. Commonwealth
See Proffitt v. Wainwright, 706 F.2d 311, 312 (11th Cir.1983). cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 1003, 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983) (competency hearing); Larson v. Tansy, 911 F.2d 392, 396 (10th Cir.1990) (jury instructions, summations, and verdict); United States v. Gordon, 829 F.2d 119, 125 (D.C.Cir.1987) (voir dire and impaneling of jury); Cross v. United States, 325 F.2d 629, 632-33 (D.C.Cir.1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Johnson
See Tarpley v. Estelle, 703 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Johnson
See Tarpley v. Estelle, 703 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Noel Edward Plunkett v. Mark H. Luttrell, Warden M.F. Willis D. Mills, Officer Jane Doe John Doe
See Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246, 251 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Thorsted v. Gregoire
See Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1527 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Contractors Ass'n of Eastern Pennsylvania v. City of Philadelphia
See loyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1527 (9th Cir.) (elected member of county Board of Supervisors had standing only to challenge application of Arizona statute barring salaried officeholders from running for elections to other elected Supervisors), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); United States v. Lemons, 697 F.2d 832, 837 (8th Cir.1983) (homosexual convicted of sodomy in a public place under Arkansas statute had no standing to challenge statute on the ground it could not constitutionally be applied in a private place). .
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227, 1260 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 1003, 104 S.Ct. 508 , 509, 78 L.Ed.2d 697 , 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: Michael Haggert
See Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246 , 251-52 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Saving & Loan Insurance v. McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C.
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1347 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 457 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Dixon
Thus, it could have found the existence of this circumstance based solely on a finding that the murder was especially “heinous.” Hence, “even if the definitions] of [atrocious and] cruel w[ere] adequate, the vague definition ] of ... heinous would still allow a sentencer to rely upon an unconstitutionally vague standard in determining that a murder satisfies this aggravating circumstance.” Cartwright v. Maynard, 822 F.2d at 1489-90 ; see Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 , 1265 n. 57 (11th Cir.1982) (jury’s sentencing discretion was not significantly limited by constitutionally a…
cited
Cited "see"
Diamond Mortgage Corporation Of Illinois v. Peter Sugar
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1345-48 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Cenco, 686 F.2d at 454-57 .
cited
Cited "see"
Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Illinois v. Sugar
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1345-48 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Cenco, 686 F.2d at 454-57 .
cited
Cited "see"
Merton Bond v. Jesse W. Grider
See Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246 , 249 n. 1 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whittington v. State
This principle is fully articulated in Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). "... the return'of a true bill by the grand jury satisfies the principal purpose and justification for such a preliminary hearing — that there is probable cause to believe the accused committed the crime charged.” 475 S.W.2d at 946 ; Bullard v. State, 533 S.W.2d 812, 816 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); McDonald v. State, 513 S.W.2d 44, 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); accord Tarpley v. Estelle, 703 F.2d 157 , reh’g denied 710 F.2d 837 (5th Cir.) cert. denied 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Eisenberg v. Feiner (In Re Ahead by a Length, Inc.)
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Irvin v. United States
See Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246 , 249 n. 1 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Irvin v. United States
See Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246 , 249 n. 1 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lenson A. Hargrave v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
See Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 , 1238 n. 18 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983); Ford v. Strickland, 696 F.2d 804, 812 (11th Cir.) (in banc ), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 201 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Wedtech Corp. v. Hurdman (In Re Wedtech Corp.)
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1347-48 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hargrave v. Dugger
See Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 , 1238 n. 18 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983); Ford v. Strickland, 696 F.2d 804, 812 (11th Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 201 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wing v. J.C. Bradford & Co.
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Tryco Trucking Company, Inc. v. Belk Stores Services, Inc., 634 F.Supp. 1327 (W.D.N.C.1986); Morley v. Cohen, 610 F.Supp. 798 (D.Md. 1985); Bernstein v. IDT Corp., 582 F.Supp. 1079 (D.Del.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Flynn v. Dyzwilewski
See Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246, 249 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Robertson v. White
See, Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana State Employees Ass'n v. Indiana Republican State Central Committee
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ind. St. Employees Ass'n v. Ind. Repub. St. Cent.
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bondi v. Citigroup, Inc.
See, e.g., Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1348 (7th Cir.) (finding that “the prolonged artificial insolvency” of the company benefited “only [the company’s] managers and the other alleged conspirators, not the corporation”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haines v. Risley
See also Tarpley v. Estelle, 703 F.2d 157 , 161 n. 6 (5th Cir.1983) (noting but not answering the question), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983); cf. Fawcett v. Bablitch, 962 F.2d 617, 618 (7th Cir. 1992).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Carenbauer v. Hechler
(4×)
See Clements, 457 U.S. at 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2836 ; Donnahoe, 174 W.Va. at 33-34 , 321 S.E.2d at 684 ; see also Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1531 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983) (rejecting argument that fourth qualification for office was being imposed by Arizona "resign-to-run" provision "because it does not prevent an elected state officeholder from running for federal office" and justifying this "indirect burden on potential candidates for Congress" as permissible regulation of state officeholders); Signorelli v. Evans, 637 F.2d 853, 859 (2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Hill
(2×)
See, e.g., Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523 (9th *357 Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Omar Blanco, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227, 1255 (11th Cir.1982) (rejecting trial judge’s testimony that he made no use of psychiatrist’s report that was admitted without affording defendant opportunity for cross-examination), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983). 136 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bishop v. Kelso
See e.g., Tarpley v. Estelle, 703 F.2d 157 , 162 n. 8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983); Holloway v. McElroy, 632 F.2d 605 , 640 n. 55 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chivas Products Limited v. Owen
See also Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1357-58 (7th Cir.) (the notion that the objectives of RICO and the antitrust laws were identical is unsupported by legislative history), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983). 2 45 In Sedima S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479, 485, 498-99 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3279, 3285-86 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985), the Supreme Court specifically cautioned courts against employing analogies to the Clayton Act that limit the scope or availability of RICO claims. 3 See also Lou v. Belzberg, 834 F.2d at 737 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chivas Products Ltd. v. Owen
See also Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1357-58 (7th Cir.) (the notion that the objectives of RICO and the antitrust laws were identical is unsupported by legislative history), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983). 2 In Sedima S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479, 485, 498-99 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3279, 3285-86 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985), the Supreme Court specifically cautioned courts against employing analogies to the Clayton Act that limit the scope or availability of RICO claims. 3 See also Lou v. Belzberg, 834 F.2d at 737.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rice
(2×)
See also Proffitt v. Wainwright, 706 F.2d 311, 312 (11th Cir.) (noting the Supreme Court's reluctance in Drope to address this issue and then following suit in resolving the issue on other grounds), cert. denied. 464 U.S. 1002 , 1003 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers & Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry
(2×)
See, e.g., Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246 , 249 n. 1 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Rutherford, 702 F.2d at 584 ; Seibert v. Baptist, 599 F.2d 743 (5th Cir.1979), reversing on rehearing 594 F.2d 423 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 918 , 100 S.Ct. 1851 , 64 L.Ed.2d 271 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reginald Lacroix Poole v. United States
See, e.g., Proffitt v. Wainwright, 706 F.2d 311 , 312 & n. 46 (11th Cir.1983), modifying on reh’g 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir.1982) (not deciding whether presence is waivable by defense attorney), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983); Hall v. Wainwright, 733 F.2d 766, 775-76 (11th Cir.1984) (remand for further development of record regarding waiver of right to be present), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 858 (1985); id. at 780-85 (Hill, J., concurring) (arguing that Proffit should be interpreted to hold that a defendant may waive his right…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Tellis v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and Parker House Sausage Company
(2×)
Illinois Dep’t of Revenue v. Phillips, 771 F.2d 312, 315 (7th Cir.1985); see also Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. United States
See, e.g., Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246, 249 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 508 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Capozzoli v. Tracey, 663 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
v.
Proffitt
v.
Proffitt
No. 83-113.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.