green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jose Estevez
(2×)
If, however, the invocation of the privilege merely precludes inquiry into collateral matters which bear only on the general credibility of the witness, there is little danger of prejudice to the defendant, and, therefore, the witness' direct testimony need not be stricken. 29 Id. at 1208-09 (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added). 30 In Gullett, a prosecution witness testified to his involvement with the defendant in a money-laundering scheme.
cited
Cited "see"
Willis v. Fugro Chance, Inc.
See Bertrand v. International Mooring & Marine, Inc., 700 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Theo Ervin Williams v. Robert Borg, Warden
(2×)
Other courts have made the distinction “between cases in which the assertion of the privilege merely precludes inquiry into collateral matters which bear only on the credibility of the witness and those cases in which the assertion of the privilege prevents inquiry into matters about which the witness testified on direct examination.” United States v. Cardillo, 316 F.2d 606, 611 (2d Cir.) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 822 , 84 S.Ct. 60 , 11 L.Ed.2d 55 (1963); see United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1209 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 973 , 79 L.Ed.2…
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Keegan Management Co.
See Lewis v. Brown & Root, Inc., 711 F.2d 1287, 1292 (5th Cir.1983), modified, 722 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 975 , 79 L.Ed.2d 213 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
James Taylor Josephine Taylor v. Anderson-Tully Company
See Bertrand v. International Mooring & Marine, Inc., 700 F.2d 240, 246 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric J. Brown
Rather, we must look to all the facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the unlawful activity alleged, the length of the activity, and the nature of the property to be seized. 23 McCall, 740 F.2d at 1336 (citation omitted); accord United States v. Haimowitz, 706 F.2d 1549, 1554-55 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 (1984); Freeman, 685 F.2d at 951 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, Inc
The legislative history of this section makes it clear that the September 12, 1980 amendment was intended to "expand [ ] the category of expenses the judges might require and attorney to satisfy personally to include ... attorneys fees.” Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, 96th Cong.2d Sess. 8, reprinted in 1980, U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 2716, 2781, 2782; see abo Lewb v. Brown and Root, Inc., 711 F.2d 1287, 1289, 1292 (5th Cir.1983) (upholding an award of attorneys fees under section 1927 against plaintiff and his attorney jointly and severally), cert. denied, 464 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johns
See United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1210 (6th Cir.1983) (“The words ‘stolen, converted or taken by fraud’ have been construed to encompass virtually all ways by which an owner is wrongfully deprived of the use of his property.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 973 , 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984). *222 Regardless of the extent of Johns’ knowledge concerning these checks, the government’s proof must fail as a matter of law because, as I explained in part II.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Riley E. Harris A/K/A \Butch\" Harris and Dorsie Lee Terrill"
See United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1212 (6th Cir.1983) (citing United States v. Seelig, 622 F.2d 207, 213 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 869 (1980)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 (1984). 18 Defense counsel's closing argument invited response by subtly and improperly referring to the prosecution's failure to indict defendants on charges pertaining to the blue Chevrolet.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Hospital Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
See Mills v. United States, 713 F.2d 1249, 1252 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984) (generally, the committee report is “the most persuasive indicia of Congressional intent (with the exception, of course, of the language of the statute itself)”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orlando Zapata
See United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1209 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 973 , 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. State
See Ledesma v. State, 251 Ga. 487 (5) ( 306 SE2d 629 ) (1983), cert. denied 464 U. S. 1069 (1984); Hilburn v. State, 166 Ga. App. 357 ( 304 SE2d 480 ) (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Theriot v. St. Martin, Lirette, Gaubert & Shea
See Bertrand v. Int'l Mooring & Marine, 700 F.2d 240, 244 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984); Holland v. Allied Structural Steel Co., 539 F.2d 476, 483 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1105 , 97 S.Ct. 1136 , 51 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey Kelly Sims
See United States v. Haimowitz, 706 F.2d 1549 , 1556 n. 2 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984); United States v. Astroff, 578 F.2d 133 (5th Cir.1978) (in banc). 3 “To mandate an evidentiary hearing, the challenger’s attack must be more than conclusory and must be supported by more than a mere desire to cross examine.” Franks, 438 U.S. at 171 , 98 S.Ct. at 2684 .
cited
Cited "see"
Patton-Tully Transportation Company v. Ratliff
See Bertrand v. International Mooring and Marine, Inc., 700 F.2d 240, 244-245 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984); Barrett, 781 F.2d at 1074 .
cited
Cited "see"
Patton-Tully Transportation Co. v. Ratliff
See Bertrand v. International Mooring and Marine, Inc., 700 F.2d 240, 244-245 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984); Barrett, 781 F.2d at 1074 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Honey v. People
See United States v. Haimowitz, 706 F.2d 1549, 1560 (11th Cir.1983) (defendant’s credibility may be impeached by a witness who had known defendant for ten years and by a former law partner), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984); Watson, 669 F.2d at 1382 n. 6 (trial court erred in denying defendant opportunity to impeach government witness with testimony of witness who had lived near government witness for six years and worked with him on two or three occasions for less than an hour on each occasion, a witness who had employed the government witness for three mo…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.
(2×)
See Mills v. United States, 713 F.2d 1249 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ospina
Accord, United States v. Haimowitz, 706 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Layne B. Foulk Marjorie E. Foulk, H/w v. Donjon Marine Company, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. Breakwaters International, Inc., Third-Party Donjon Marine Company, Inc., in 97-5235. Layne B. Foulk Marjorie E. Foulk, in 97-5269
See, e.g., Bertrand v. International Mooring & Marine, Inc., 700 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foulk v. Donjon Marine Co Inc
(2×)
See, e.g., Bertrand v. International Mooring & Marine, Inc., 700 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 974 , 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Cuomo
See, e.g., Lewis v. Brown & Root, Inc., 711 F.2d 1287, 1292 (5th Cir.1983), modified, 722 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 975 , 79 L.Ed.2d 213 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)
(2×)
See Pennell, 737 F.2d at 526 (reserving the question whether prosecutorial misconduct in making immunity decisions can constitute a due process violation); Lenz, 616 F.2d at 963-64 ; see also United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1210 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 973 , 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marzullo
See, e.g., United States v. Morrow, 717 F.2d 800 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 975 , 79 L.Ed.2d 213 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Girolamo Vitale, Girolamo Vito Palazzolo
See also United States v. Murrow, 717 F.2d 800, 804 (3d Cir.1983) (single conspiracy may have many goals and objectives), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 (1984). 5 Vitale asserts that the search warrant of his home was unconstitutionally broad because it authorized the search for items unrelated to the charges against him.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Susan Brooks
See also United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1212 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Focht, an Individual, and Mark Focht, an Individual, Doing Business Under the Name Liberty Industries
See, e.g., United States v. Morrow, 717 F.2d 800, 802 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 975 , 79 L.Ed.2d 213 (1984) (building as bomb); United States v. Agrillo-Ladlad, 675 F.2d 905, 911 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982) (newspapers and naptha as bomb).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Debbe Marquardt
Courts have found that when an indictment is multiplicitous, “[I]t may prejudice the jury against the defendant by creating the impression of more criminal activity on his part than in fact may have been present.” United States v. Carter, 576 F.2d 1061, 1064 (3rd Cir.1978); see also United States v. Gullett, 713 F.2d 1203, 1211-12 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069 , 104 S.Ct. 973 , 79 L.Ed.2d 211 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gullett
v.
United States and Fox v. United States
v.
United States and Fox v. United States
No. 83-432; No. 83-616.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: 713 F. 2d 1203.