green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
International Longshoremen's Association v. Virginia International Terminals, Inc.
Workers of Am. v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp., 383 U.S. 696, 707 (1966)); accord Metz v. Tootsie Roll Indus., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 (1984). 10 Though cognizant of the federal policy favoring prompt resolution of labor disputes, we have noted the Supreme Court's recent observation that "even [a limitations period of] six years is not long enough to frustrate th[at policy]." See North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas, --- U.S. ---, 115 S.Ct. 1927, 1931 (1995) (citing Hoosier Cardinal Corp., 383 U.S. at 707 )).
cited
Cited "see"
ILA Steamship Clerks v. VA Intl Terminals
Workers of Am. v. Hoosier Cardi- nal Corp., 383 U.S. 696, 707 (1966)); accord Metz v. Tootsie Roll Indus., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Sioux City Foundry Company v. City Of South Sioux City
See Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396, 1399 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 978 , 79 L.Ed.2d 215 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Sioux City Foundry Co. v. City of South Sioux City
See Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396, 1399 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 978 , 79 L.Ed.2d 215 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Schultz v. State, 437 So.2d 670 (Ala.Crim.App.1983), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 213 (1984) (stop justified based on slow movement of vehicle in cotton field in area where there had been complaints of night hunting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith Wilson Co. v. Trading & Development Establishment
Matterhorn, Inc., 763 F.2d at 868-69 (“An arbitration clause will often be ‘severable’ from the contract in which it is embedded, in the sense that it may be valid even if the rest of the contract is invalid.” (emphasis added)); see Sauer-Getriebe KG v. White Hydraulics, Inc., 715 F.2d 348, 350 (7th Cir.1983) (ordering arbitration of dispute over enforceability of contract because “[t]he agreement to arbitrate and the agreement to buy and sell motors are separate” and because plaintiff’s “promise to arbitrate was given in exchange for [defendant’s] promise to arbitrate and ea…
discussed
Cited "see"
Balsavage v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Accord Metz v. Tootsie Roll Indus., Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Chrysler Workers Ass’n. v. Chrysler Corp., 834 F.2d 573, 578 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2017 , 100 L.Ed.2d 604 (1988); Shapiro v. Cook United, Inc., 762 F.2d 49, 51 (6th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Student Loan Authority v. NELS, Inc.
(2×)
See Telford v. Clackamas County Housing Authority, 710 F.2d 567, 571 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 977 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnnie Will Johnson v. Artim Transportation System, Inc., and Teamsters Union Local 142, Defendants
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 303 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnnie Bonds v. The Coca-Cola Company
(2×)
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ambrose Daigle v. Gulf State Utilities Co., Local Union Number 2286
Hersh v. Allen Products Co., Inc., 789 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir.1986); see, Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984), citing, Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99,102 (9th Cir.1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ina King v. The New York Telephone Company, Inc., and the Telephone Traffic Union (New York)
(2×)
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Illis v. United Steelworkers, 615 F.Supp. 1081 , 1085 n. 3 (D.V.1.1985); Hull v. Local 414, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 601 F.Supp. 869, 873 (N.D.Ind.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
H. Jack Frandsen v. Brotherhood Of Railway, Airline And Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express And Station Employees
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll, 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984) 9 BRAC relies on a footnote in Schultz v. Owens-Illinois, 696 F.2d 505 , 514 n. 12 (7th Cir.1982), for the proposition that in a contract negotiation duty of fair representation case, a union member's pursuit of internal union remedies can never afford complete relief.
cited
Cited "see"
Frandsen v. Brotherhood of Railway
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll, 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids
As explained in this court’s ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss, under the applicable law, a public employee’s liberty interest, the basis for a due process claim, is impinged “when, in connection with the employee’s discharge, a government official makes [public] accusations that seriously damage the employee’s standing in the community or foreclose other employment opportunities.’” Mercer, 79 F.Supp.2d at 1063 (quoting Johnson, 113 F.3d at 843); see also id. (citing Johnson, 113 F.3d at 844, and Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396, 1401 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 46…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herrera v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
Demars v. General Dynamic Corp., 779 F.2d 95, 99 (1st Cir.1985) (employee failed to make meaningful inquiry for nearly three years after grievance filed; statute of limitations on § 301 hybrid suit not tolled); see also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Indus., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,660 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Lawrence E. Salvano and James B. Coon
See, e.g., Sauer-Getriebe KG v. White Hydraulics, Inc., 715 F.2d 348, 351-52 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Teradyne, Inc. v. Mostek Corp., 797 F.2d 43, 47-51 (1st Cir.1986); Blumenthal v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 910 F.2d 1049, 1052-53 (2d Cir.1990); Roso-Lino Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 749 F.2d 124, 125 (2d Cir.1984); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Bradley, 756 F.2d 1048 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sewell v. GENSTAR GYPSUM PRODUCTS CO.
See also discussion in Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984), citing, inter alia, Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99, 102 (9th Cir.1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R. Dement J.H. Hines V.N. Meekins L.A. Koenig v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company United Transportation Union
(2×)
Compare Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984) (union refused to process grievance); Demars, 779 F.2d at 98-99 (union told plaintiff "it had done 'all [it] could do' "); see King, 785 F.2d at 35 (distinguishing situation in Metz ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Knickle v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
See also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lacina v. G-K Trucking
See also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983) (considering what reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered in determining accrual date), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).III 17 Because the facts which caused the district court to impose sanctions are not in dispute, we review the district court's conclusion that plaintiffs' counsel violated Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 de novo, Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, 780 F.2d 823, 828 (9th Cir.1986), and reverse.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lacina v. G-K Trucking
See also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983) (considering what reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered in determining accrual date), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 84-3618
See, e.g., Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Former Frigidaire Employees Association v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, Local 801, 573 F.Supp. 59 (S.D.Ohio 1983), affirmed sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sevako v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.
See, e.g., Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Former Frigidaire Employees Association v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, Local 801, 573 F.Supp. 59 (S.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schultz
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 83-803.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.