green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Theodore Robert Bundy v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary Department of Corrections, State of Florida
the determination of whether the admission of the hearsay statements violated haggin's sixth amendment right to confrontation is a question of law, which involves the application of legal principles to historical facts
cited
Cited "see"
Levi v. Chapman
See One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 452 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. den., 464 U.S. 1071 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Fowler, Jr. v. At & T Corp. Ed Wall Bob Alvarez
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 (1984). 5 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a request for leave to amend a complaint.
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Mishmash v. State, 423 So.2d 446 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), review denied, 434 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984). [2] See also Harvey v. State, 390 So.2d 484 , 485 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Sioux City Foundry Company v. City Of South Sioux City
See Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396, 1399 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 978 , 79 L.Ed.2d 215 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Sioux City Foundry Co. v. City of South Sioux City
See Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396, 1399 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 978 , 79 L.Ed.2d 215 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Chapman and Jack E. Wright
See United States v. Gaertner, 705 F.2d 210, 217 (7th Cir.1983) (“Indeed, great deference is accorded to the discretion and judgment of the trial court when granting and/or denying a party’s motion for rebuttal or surrebuttal testimony.”), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 979 , 79 L.Ed.2d 216 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian T. Ellzey
See Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1557 (10th Cir.1990) (review Confrontation Clause claims de novo, citing Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Guenther
“However, the conclusion ... that the hearsay statements are reliable is a mixed question of law and fact, and hence is reviewed de novo.” Myatt v. Hannigan, 910 F.2d 680, 685 (10th Cir.1990); see Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elton John Myatt v. Robert Hannigan and the Attorney General of the State of Kansas
See Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1055 (6th Cir.1983) (“whether the admission of the child’s statements violated the confrontation clause ... [is a] determination ] of law, subject to collateral review by the federal courts”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); cf. Sumner v. Mata II, 455 U.S. 591, 597 , 102 S.Ct. 1303, 1306 , 71 L.Ed.2d 480 (1982) (the ultimate question of the constitutionality of identification procedures is not subject to a presumption of correctness under § 2254); Martinez v. Sullivan, 881 F.2d 921, 925-26…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1987 Ford F-350 4× 4 Pickup
See U.S. v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 450 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984) (court avoids deciding contention that federal seizure was done without a warrant and without due process because the “ ‘mere fact of the illegal seizure, standing alone, does not immunize the goods from forfeiture,’ ” quoting U.S. v. One 1971 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle, 508 F.2d 351 (9th Cir.1974) (per curiam)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1986 Mercedes Benz
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 449-50 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984). 8 Finally, at oral argument, Parker argued that forfeiture of the Mercedes could not be predicated on the transportation of such a small quantity of marijuana, since under New York law the possession of less than 25 grams of marijuana has been decriminalized.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1986 Mercedes Benz, VIN WDBEA30D2GA143459
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 449-50 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pugliese
See United States v. Gaertner, 705 F.2d 210, 216 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 (1984) (once defendant put his character in issue by denying involvement in “drug thing,” he opened the door to questions on his prior or present drug involvement); United States v. Ebner, 782 F.2d 1120, 1126 (2d Cir. 1986) (under Federal Rule of Evidence 609(b), defendant opened the door to use of earlier State securities fraud conviction by claiming that he had entered guilty plea to subsequent federal charge because of his lawyer’s bad advice and undue influence).
cited
Cited "see"
James Roy Davis v. Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary, State of Tennessee
See Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1054-55 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murray v. Commercial Union Insurance
Gooding v, Warner-Lambert Co., 744 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 4 (3d Cir.1984); accord United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S. Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harry C. Murray v. Commercial Union Insurance Company
Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Co., 744 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 4 (3d Cir.1984); accord United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
John Charles McAninch of the Estate of John W. McAninch George Droege Mrs. Chester Thompson and Jerald A. Thompson, D/B/A Thompson & Sons Don J. Gatens John v. Hansen Kendall Oden Paul Bettin Earl Galloway James R. Miksch Ralph Debruin Ed Crall Frank Dirks Fred Olson Orval L. Miller Frank Rhodenbaugh and Albia Sales Company, Inc. v. Traders National Bank of Kansas City, John Charles McAninch of the Estate of John W. McAninch George Droege Mrs. Chester Thompson and Jerald A. Thompson, D/B/A Thompson & Sons Don J. Gatens John v. Hansen Kendall Oden Paul Bettin Earl Galloway James R. Miksch Ralph Debruin Ed Crall Frank Dirks Fred Olson Orval L. Miller Frank Rhodenbaugh and Albia Sales Company, Inc. v. John H. Kreamer William L. Turner Gage & Tucker Wayne H. Hoecker George Coughlin Thomas J. Guilfoil and General Bancshares Corporation
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
McAninch v. Traders National Bank
See United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 451 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 981 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northside Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
See generally Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396 (8th Cir.1983) (application of mootness doctrine), cert. denied, —U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 978 , 79 L.Ed.2d 215 (1984); Allen v. Likins, 517 F.2d 532, 534-35 (8th Cir.1975) (application of mootness doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CHS Inc. v. ABM Healthcare Support Services, Inc.
Va. 1987); see also Scott, at *3 (quoting United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 452 (9th Cir. 1983), cert denied, 464 U.S. 1071 (1984)) (“[A] third-party claim may be asserted only when the third party’s liability is in some way dependent on the outcome of the main claim and the third party’s liability is secondary or derivative.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids
(2×)
As explained in this court’s ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss, under the applicable law, a public employee’s liberty interest, the basis for a due process claim, is impinged “when, in connection with the employee’s discharge, a government official makes [public] accusations that seriously damage the employee’s standing in the community or foreclose other employment opportunities.’” Mercer, 79 F.Supp.2d at 1063 (quoting Johnson, 113 F.3d at 843); see also id. (citing Johnson, 113 F.3d at 844, and Bell v. Sellevold, 713 F.2d 1396, 1401 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 46…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center Associates
The third-party claim has the effect of shifting all or part of the third-party plaintiffs liability to its defendant.” Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. Jewett, 125 Or App 178, 193 , 865 P2d 420 (1993), aff'd 320 Or 599 , 892 P2d 683 (1995) (citations omitted); see also Fisher v. Bowman, 97 Or App 357, 360 , 776 P2d 575 , rev den 308 Or 500 (1989) (third-party liability must “ ‘in some way [be] dependent upon the outcome of the main claim’ ”) (quoting United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F2d 444, 452 (9th Cir 1983), cert den 464 US 1071 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Troy P.
(2×)
See, e.g., Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1057-58 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); United States v. Iron Shell, 633 F.2d 77, 85-86 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1709 , 68 L.Ed.2d 203 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Authority of the Customs Service to Seize or Forfeit Property Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881
See also United States v One Ford Coupe Automobile, 272 U.S. at 325 (adoption of seizure by United States for forfeiture permissible even when seizing party lacked authonty to make seizure). 44 Dodge v. United States, 272 U.S. at 532. 45 Id 46 See, e g , United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 708 F.2d 444, 450 (9th Cir. 1983) (in forfeiture action against automobile allegedly used to transport narcotics, jurisdiction of the court was secured by the fact that the res was in the possession of the party authonzed to seize when the action was filed), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1071 (1984); Kieffer v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ferrey
See also Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050 (6th Cir.1983) (excited utterances of four-year-old victim admitted even though she was ruled incompetent to testify by state trial judge), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc.
See also Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State Farm, 715 F.2d 1050, 1057 (6th Cir.1983) (the issue on federal habeas review is not “whether the statements are admissible under the state evidentiary rules”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 980 , 79 L.Ed.2d 217 (1984); Olson v. Green, 668 F.2d 421 , 428 n. 12 (8th Cir.1982) (“state court’s interpretation of its own rules of evidence is binding” upon federal court).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.
v.
Clark, Secretary of the Interior
v.
Clark, Secretary of the Interior
No. 83-856.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.