green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“stewart held that ... no bfoq was necessary to justify the maximum age entry requirements for federal law enforcement officers.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Francke v. United States Department of Treasury
stewart held that ... no bfoq was necessary to justify the maximum age entry requirements for federal law enforcement officers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. City of Syracuse
See Church, 35 F.Supp.2d at 217 (quoting Litton Sys., Inc. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785 , 827 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 (1984)); see also Stein Industries., Inc. v. Jarco Industries., Inc., 33 F.Supp.2d 163 , 165–66 (E.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Zeller v. Consolini
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 809-12 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S. Ct. 984 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Peden v. State
See Mitchell v. State, 650 S.W.2d 801, 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073, 104 S.Ct. 985 , 79 L.Ed.2d 221 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dutton v. Johnson County Board of County Commissioners
See E.E.O.C. v. Los Angeles County, 531 F.Supp. 122 (C.D.Cal.1982) (denying stay pending appeal in age discrimination case), aff'd, 706 F.2d 1039 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Link v. City of Lewistown
(2×)
See E.E.O.C. v. County of Los Angeles (9th Cir. 1983), 706 F.2d 1039, 1043 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 .
cited
Cited "see"
The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission, American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors
See Litton Sys. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Troy Coleman v. James L. Saffle, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester Oklahoma
(2×)
See Coleman v. Oklahoma, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 986 , 79 L.Ed.2d 222 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sylvia Evans v. City of Chicago, Bertha Balark v. City of Chicago, Curtis Collum, Cross-Appellants v. City of Chicago, Cross-Appellees
See Litton Systems v. AT & T, 746 F.2d 168 , 175 (2d Cir.) (new rate not retroactive and it does not apply to cases pending at that date on direct review), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Dollar Rent A Car Systems, Inc., 712 F.2d 938 , 940 n. 5 (4th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. State
See Coleman v. State, 668 P.2d 1126 (Okl.Cr.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 986 , 79 L.Ed.2d 222 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. Work
See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 , 92 S.Ct. 609 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972); United Mineworkers of America v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 , 85 S.Ct. 1585 , 14 L.Ed.2d 626 (1965); Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 , 81 S.Ct. 523 , 5 L.Ed.2d 464 (1961); see generally Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 806-09 (2d Cir.1983) (discussing doctrine), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Plunkett v. State
See Coleman v. State, 668 P.2d 1126 (Okl.Cr.1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 986 , 79 L.Ed.2d 222 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc.
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT&T, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance
See Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT&T, 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Foster, Evans and Huffington v. State
(2×)
See Foster v. State, 297 Md. 191 , 464 A.2d 986 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 985 , 79 L.Ed.2d 221 (1984); Evans v. State, 301 Md. 45 , 481 A.2d 1135 (1984), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 1411 , 84 L.Ed.2d 795 (1985); Huffington v. State, 295 Md. 1 , 452 A.2d 1211 (1982); Huffington v. State, 302 Md. 184 , 486 A.2d 200 (1985). [5] The beginning of Foster's requested jury instruction was as follows: "DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED INSTRUCTION NO. 9 "Your next duty will be to weigh any mitigating circumstances which exist against any aggravating circumstances which exist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Parmalat Securities Litigation
Fed.R.Evid. 602; see also Thomas v. Stone Container Corp., 922 F.Supp. 950, 957 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (citing Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 816-17 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984)). 156 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton
See United States v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310, 315 (5th Cir.1987) (“It is difficult to imagine a greater motivation to lie than the inducement of a reduced sentence ____”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S.Ct. 749 , 98 L.Ed.2d 762 (1988); Schwartz, 785 F.2d at 680 (“A violation of trust which is influenced by the offer of an intangible service is no less damaging ... than if the influence was in the form of a cash kickback.”); United States v. Meinster, 619 F.2d 1041, 1045 (4th Cir.1980) (“We think it obvious that promises of immunity or leniency premised on cooperation in …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Eason
See also United States v. Miller, 720 F.2d 227, 228 (1st Cir. 1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1073 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Velez
Gentile v. County of Suffolk, 926 F.2d 142, 148 (2d Cir.1991); Perrin v. Anderson, 784 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (10th Cir.1986); see also Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 700 F.2d 785, 818-19 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Anderson v. City of New York, 657 F.Supp. 1571, 1578 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Noone
Turner v. Fair, 617 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1980) (quoting United States v. Rogers, 475 F.2d 821, 827 (7th Cir.1973)) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253, 1257 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Seifert, 648 F.2d 557, 562 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Huggins
(See, People v Stuart, 123 AD2d 46, 54 [2d Dept 1986] [where the court held it was not error to deny a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction predicated upon the ground of newly discovered evidence where the motion was made more than one year after the discovery of the new evidence since such motion was not made with due diligence]; see also, United States v Ochs, 548 F Supp 502, 512-513 [SD NY 1982], affd 742 F2d 1444 [2d Cir 1983], cert denied 464 US 1073 [1984]; People v Mancuso, 141 Misc 2d 382, 388 [Sup Ct, Kings County 1988].) While this failure alone warranted denial of the instant m…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
See, e.g., Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 700 F.2d 785, 813-14 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984). 26 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Burlington Northern, Inc., Burlington Northern Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corp., Union Pacific Railroad Co., Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., Kansas City Southern Railway Co. & Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
See Clipper Exxpress, 690 F.2d at 1255 ; see also Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785, 810 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 472 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co., 488 F.Supp. 1258, 1265-66 (S.D.Fla.1980); P. Areeda & H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Burlington Northern, Inc.
See Clipper Exxpress, 690 F.2d at 1255 ; see also Litton Systems, Inc. v. AT & T, 700 F.2d 785, 810 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 472 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co., 488 F.Supp. 1258, 1265-66 (S.D.Fla.1980); P. Areeda & H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cartwright v. Maynard
See also, e.g., Coleman v. State, 668 P.2d 1126, 1138 (Okla.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 986 , 79 L.Ed.2d 222 (1984); Hays v. State, 617 P.2d 223, 231-32 (Okla.Crim.App.1980). 63 We agree that all of the circumstances surrounding a murder must be examined to determine whether the murder was "especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel," but there must be some objective standard that specifies which circumstances support such a determination.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cartwright v. Maynard
See also, e.g., Coleman v. State, 668 P.2d 1126, 1138 (Okla.Crim.App.1983), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 986 , 79 L.Ed.2d 222 (1984); Hays v. State, 617 P.2d 223, 231-32 (Okla.Crim.App.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Viera
(2×)
See also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253, 1257 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), quoting Fountain v. United States, 384 F.2d 624, 628 (5th Cir.1967) ("[T]he relevant question on review is 'whether defendant's inability to make the inquiry created a substantial danger of prejudice by depriving him of the ability to test the truth of the witness' direct testimony.' "). 16 In this case, appellant was able to disclose to the jury by various means all the information he had wanted to present through cross-examination of King. 1 King's incons…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Anderson Davis, Jr., Leo Glen Nash and William A. Tyer
This Court will uphold a jury verdict in a criminal case so long as “there is substantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, to uphold the jury’s decision.” United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1382 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) (quoting Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 17 , 98 S.Ct. 2141, 2150 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978)); see also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253, 1256 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph A. Iervolino v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(2×)
Compare EEOC v. County of Los Angeles, 706 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1983) (economic considerations cannot be considered in BFOQ defense), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); Orzel v. City of Wauwatosa Fire Dept., 697 F.2d 743, 755 (7th Cir.) (economic factors such as "the need to have a definite and financially feasible age upon which a retirement benefit formula could be based” cannot be the basis for BFOQ defense), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 484 , 78 L.Ed.2d 680 (1983); Smallwood v. United Air Lines, 661 F.2d 303 , 308 (4th Cir.1981) (airline ca…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosenthal
See also the case of United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), in which the court held that the specifics of the agreement went to the weight of the testimony and not its admissibility.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Robert Edward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, Garland Hubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart, Joseph Vincent Junker, United States of America v. Rose Marie Junker, United States of America v. Dennis Wayne Wilson
See also the case of United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984), in which the court held that the specifics of the agreement went to the weight of the testimony and not its admissibility.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James D. Baresh
See also United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1983) ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984); United States v. Merida, 765 F.2d 1205, 1216 , reh. denied 770 F.2d 164 (5th Cir.1985) (Limitations on scope of cross examination reviewable for abuse of discretion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc. v. Hospital Authority of America
Compare Litton Systems v. AT & T, 487 F.Supp. 942 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 700 F.2d *830 785, 809-12 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 984 , 79 L.Ed.2d 220 (1984) (Defendant’s allegedly misleading tariffs filed for some seven years with federal and state agencies, thus delaying FCC’s ultimate rejection of same, constituted an antitrust offense).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kimble
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5845.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.