green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“A description is sufficiently particular when it enables the searcher to reasonably ascertain and identify the things authorized to be seized”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
National Federation of Blind, Inc. v. Loompanics Enterprises, Inc.
But see National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 488 (7th Cir.1982) (“[I]f the components of a trade name are common descriptive [generic] terms, a combination of such terms retains that quality.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ferris v. Wynn Resorts Limited
prior representation of a party to a suit by 20 the sitting judge is not, standing alone, grounds for disqualification when the statute only requires a 21 judge to disqualify himself if 'he served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Manuel Bros. v. United States
a principle of contract interpretation is that the contract must be interpreted in accordance with the parties' understanding as shown by their conduct before the controversy.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
College Entrance Examination Board v. Pataki
(3×)
also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see"
we agree with the register of copyrights that the would probably be classified as an unpublished work under 17 u.s.c. 101 ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Regan
a description is sufficiently particular when it enables the searcher to reasonably ascertain and identify the things authorized to be seized
discussed
Cited "see"
Cochran v. State
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 , 1350 n. 6 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (concluding that an affidavit can be used to cure lack of particularity in a warrant if the affidavit is either incorporated into or attached to the warrant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Savoy v. United States
“However, the person seeking return of *933 property must show that they are lawfully entitled to possess it.” United States v. Headley, 50 Fed.Appx. 266, 267 (6th Cir. 2002) (unpublished order); accord Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 262 (6th Cir.) (holding that Rule 41 places the burden on the claimant), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Somerstein
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (affirming conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664 based, in part, on loans made in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme).
discussed
Cited "see"
Villa v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051, 1058 (Fed.Cir.) (“A principle of contract interpretation is that the contract must be interpreted in accordance with the parties’ understanding as shown by their conduct before the controversy.”), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ross v. Runyon
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, 698 F.2d 250, 255-56 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Wag-Aero, Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Waugneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1348 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bianco
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1351, n. 6 (11th Cir.1982) (looking to underlying affidavit even where unattached to warrant, where searchers were adequately informed of limitations on search), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Zanche, 541 F.Supp. 207, 213 (W.D.N.Y.1982) ("[i]t was also proper to examine the affidavit in deciding the degree of specificity required in the warrant").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bianco
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1351, n. 6 (11th Cir.1982) (looking to underlying affidavit even where unattached to warrant, where searchers were adequately informed of limitations on search), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Zanche, 541 F.Supp. 207, 213 (W.D.N.Y.1982) (“[i]t was also proper to examine the affidavit in deciding the degree of specificity required in the warrant”).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Kiewit Companies, Witness-Appellant v. United States
(2×)
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
James Wingard v. Harold Smith, Warden Charles Holden, Corporal Ricky Holtsclaw, Co 1 B.J. Potter, Sgt. Timothy Stallard, Co 1
See generally Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 571 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). 8 Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
cited
Cited "see"
Granite Construction Company v. The United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051, 1058 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Opn. No.
See, National Conference of Bar Examiners v Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 495 F. Supp. 34 (ND Ill 1980), affd, 692 F.2d 478 (7th Cir 1982), cert denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Fallsburg v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051, 1055 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Bernard Starks
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). 3 It is ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific Insurance
See National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); American Diabetes Ass’n v. National Diabetes Ass’n, 533 F.Supp. 16, 19 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 681 F.2d 804 (3d Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (cited as Egg City II). 5 This court finds, therefore, that the combination of: 1) the congressional intent to encourage those injured by government destruction to assist the government in its greater effort to eradicate the disease by fair compensation, 2) the consistent findings of courts that fair market value, notwithstanding the fact that it has a settled legal meaning, cannot mean a value that fails to provide adequate compensation, and 3) the Secre…
discussed
Cited "see"
American International Group, Inc. v. American International Airways, Inc.
See National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); American Diabetes Association v. National Diabetes Association, 533 F.Supp. 16, 19 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 681 F.2d 804 (3d Cir.1982). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Young
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jay T. Will
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983); United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 262 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 (1981); United States v. LaFatch, 565 F.2d 81, 83 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 971 (1978). 4 Because Will's motion was made at a time when the criminal proceeding was no longer pending, the request for return of the seized property is a civil equitable proceeding, notwithstanding the fact that the motion was styled under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy Door Bed Co. v. Interior Sleep Systems, Inc.
See National Conference v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Reese Publishing Co., Inc. v. Hampton International Communications, Inc., 620 F.2d 7, 11 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(2×)
See National Conference of Bar *1467 Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478, 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1983). 18.
cited
Cited "see"
Laurel C. Thomas v. Walter Shipka, in His Capacity as Clerk of the Parma Municipal Court
See Lawson v. Truck Drivers, 698 F.2d 250 , 254 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293 , 303 (D.C.Cir.1980); Fed.R.Crim.P. advisory committee note; 3 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe
See Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293 , 303 (D.C.Cir.1980); Fed.R.Crim.P. advisory committee note; 3 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Norman Lee Vaden v. United States Postal Service
See Lawson v. Teamsters Local 100, 698 F.2d 250 , 254-55 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983); Abernathy v. USPS, 740 F.2d 612 (8th Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Systems Exploration, Inc. v. United States
See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v. United States, 697 F.2d 1051 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 68 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); A & K Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc. v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 716 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Alabama v. Kala Blakely and Bartley Evan Blakely
See also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) and United States v. Rettig, 589 F.2d 418, 423 (9th Cir. 1978) ('The question is whether or not the search that was conducted was confined to the authorization given by the magistrate.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interstate Net Bank v. NetB@ Nk, Inc.
See e.g., Nat’l Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 (7th Cir.1982) (holding that “Mul-tistate Bar Examination” is not protected and use of “MBE” to designate test “is of no consequence”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). *524 Defendants correctly point out that there is no dictionary definition of the exact term “netbank,” and argue that the Court must examine the mark as a whole and not consider its component elements separately.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
See also United States v. Wuagneux , 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) and United States v. Rettig , 589 F.2d 418 , 423 (9th Cir. 1978) ("The question is whether or not the search that was conducted was confined to the authorization given by the magistrate.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peebles v. State
See also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983) (allowing an IRS agent to testify during the government’s rebuttal as to a prior inconsistent statement made by the appellant’s accountant, who was unavailable to testify, after the appellant introduced a contrary statement through Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Suh v. Yang
See, e.g., National Conf. of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Abercrombie & Fitch, 537 F.2d at 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting Of Birmingham, Inc.
See, e.g., National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 & n. 12 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc.
See, e.g., National Conference of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., 692 F.2d 478 , 488 & n. 12 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carter
Id.; see also Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, *205 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 88 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sego
Super. 280, 284-85 , 601 A. 2d 757 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 127 N.J. 564 , 606 A. 2d 374 (1992); see also United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343, 1357-58 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1983); Henderson v. State, 765 S.W. 2d 336, 338 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989); State v. Kline, 11 Ohio App. 3d 208, 210-213 , 11 OBR 330, 333-336, 464 N.E. 2d 159, 162-65 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alfred Carl Bryant, Also Known as Alfred Carl Farley, Also Known as Al Cole, (91-1919) United States of America v. Alfred Carl Bryant, (91-1625)
See, e.g., Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569, 577 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983) (property lawfully retained where government demonstrates "continuing interest").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re of the Search of 4330 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
See Mr. Lucky Messenger Service, 587 F.2d at 18 ; Interstate Cigar, 928 F.2d at 224 ; see also, Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLeod v. State
See also United States v. Wuagneux , 683 F.2d 1343 , 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (in view of the fact that a trial court "may limit the number of defense witnesses without depriving a defendant of due process, particularly when there is no offer of proof as to the substance of the proposed witness' testimony and its materiality, or when the testimony would be cumulative or irrelevant . . . a request for continuance in order to procure additional witnesses is a matter within the sound discretion of the [trial] court, and when the re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White Fabricating Company, Diversified Industries, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
Compare the cases cited by the government on this question, although neither are obscenity cases, United States v. Spilotro, 800 F.2d 959 (9th Cir.1986) (a decision by Judge Kennedy holding the warrant too broad and general), with United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). 30 In this respect, we hold that the district court was in error in not conducting a hearing to consider carefully the ramifications and circumstances involved in the issuance of the warrant.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. Parsons
See also Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 (1983) and citations therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinded Veterans Association v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
See, e.g., National Conf. of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Abercrombie & Fitch, 537 F.2d at 9 . 6 Descriptive terms, which compose the second category, directly describe a partic *70 ular quality, function, or characteristic of a product or service. 7 Because descriptive terms are thus not inherently distinctive, they acquire trademark protection only upon proof of secondary meaning — ie., upon proof that the public recognizes only one source of the product or service.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinded Veterans Ass'n v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
See, e.g., National Conf. of Bar Examiners v. Multistate Legal Studies, 692 F.2d 478 , 487 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); Abercrombie & Fitch, 537 F.2d at 9 . 6 Descriptive terms, which compose the second category, directly describe a partic ular quality, function, or characteristic of a product or service. 7 Because descriptive terms are thus not inherently distinctive, they acquire trademark protection only upon proof of secondary meaning — i.e., upon proof that the public recognizes only one source of the product or service.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hadley
Compare id. (court described conduct as a deliberate deception, when an internal revenue agent intentionally led defendant to believe that evidence would be used only in a civil investigation when, in fact, the agent was conducting a criminal investigation) with United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983) (internal revenue agent need not expressly advise taxpayer that a civil audit may lead to criminal proceedings).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Multistate Legal Studies, Inc.
v.
Ladd, Register of Copyrights
v.
Ladd, Register of Copyrights
82-1685.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
MULTISTATE LEGAL STUDIES, INC.
v.
LADD, REGISTER OF COPYRIGHTS, ET AL.
No. 82-1685.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 3, 1983.
1
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 692 F.2d 478.