green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
... primary concern is with the substantive terms of the settlement____
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…notices to class members can practicably contain only a limited amount of information
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…notices to class members can predictably contain only a limited amount of information
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Dinova
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Barton Industries, Inc., 104 F.3d at 1245 (an obscure reference to an agreement incorporated into the Chapter 11 plan did not provide the secured creditors with sufficient notice about the treatment of their particular class of claim or adequate information to make a reasonable judgment about the plan); In re Micro Brokers, Inc., 59 B.R. 498, 501 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y. 1985) (after allegations of tax fraud, embezzlement, and corporate misconduct were made during a dismissal hearing set by an order to show cause that limited notice, the bankruptcy court denied the motion "because gran…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Milken
(2×)
notices to class members can practicably contain only a limited amount of information
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Milken
(2×)
notices to class members can predictably contain only a limited amount of information
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.
(2×)
... primary concern is with the substantive terms of the settlement____
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
KRAL, INC., D/B/A Ed’s Automatic Transmission Service, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHWESTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 214. 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Joyce v. Town of Dennis
See Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass’n, 695 F.2d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.1982) (permitting exclusion of boys from girls’ volleyball team), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 79 , 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983); see also Barnett v. Texas Wrestling Ass’n, 16 F.Supp.2d 690 , 695 (N.D.Tex.1998) (“it is far from clear that the refusal to sanction a mixed-gender contact sport violates the Fourteenth Amendment.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barash v. Kates
(2×)
See Autorama Corp. v. Stewart, 802 F.2d 1284, 1287-1288 (10th Cir.1986) (“Hence, it is not surprising that attorneys’ fees are awarded only when there is ‘clear evidence’ that challenged actions are taken entirely without color and are pursued for reasons of harassment or delay.”) (citations omitted), Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 80 (2d Cir.1982) (“We have required ... that there be ‘clear evidence’ that the challenged actions ‘are entirely without color and [are taken] for reasons of harassment or delay or for other improper purposes ... ’ ”) (citations omitted),…
examined
Cited "see"
Treasurer of State of Connecticut v. Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP
(4×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61 (2d Circ.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpi v. McDonnell Douglas Capital Income Fund-I
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 75-76 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re The Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 71 (2d Cir.1982) (rejecting the contention that the mailing of individual notice to the last known address of all class members was inadequate), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); Carlough v. Amchem Prod., 158 F.R.D. at 325 (“Receipt of actual notice by all class members is required neither by Rule 23 nor the Constitution____ [T]he fact that notice to some class members must be given by publication is not necessarily fatal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vladimir v. United States Banknote Corp.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Falgout Brothers, Inc. v. S/V PANGAEA
(2×)
See Platoro Limited, Inc. v. Unidentified Remains of a Vessel, 695 F.2d 893, 903-04 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 79 (2d Cir.1982) (no discovery for objector who does not present “cogent factual objections to the settlement”), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Escareno v. Carl Nolte Sohne GmbH & Co.
See the full discussion in Fehlhaber v. Fehlhaber, 681 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 79 , 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine, & Furniture Workers v. Unisys Corp.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 75-76 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); McDonnell Douglas, 838 F.Supp. at 740.
discussed
Cited "see"
In RE McDONNELL DOUGLAS EQUIP. LEASING SEC. LIT.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 75-76 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. C & C Beauty Sales, Inc.
(2×)
See Norris Indus., Inc. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 696 F.2d 918, 923 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 78 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kral, Inc. v. Southwestern Life Ins. Co.
See, Wells Fargo Business Credit v. Ben Kozloff,Inc. 695 F.2d 940, 945 , reh'g denied, 699 F.2d 1163 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 (1983).3 The only evidence linking Zeigler with SWL is his possession and use of SWL forms.
discussed
Cited "see"
Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Identified on Schedule 1 (In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.)
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 70 (2d Cir.1982) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re The Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 70 (2d Cir.1982) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Schafer
See Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Association, 695 F.2d 1126 (CA9 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 79 , 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983); Louisiana High School Athletic Association v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Producers Equipment Sales, Inc. v. Thomason
See Fehlhaber v. Fehlhaber, 681 F.2d 1015, 1031 (5th Cir. 1982), reh. denied 702 F.2d 81 , cert. denied 464 U.S. 818 (1983) (applying California law, excess portion of judgment is subject to collateral attack and enforcement of the judgment should be limited to the amount in the complaint); Compton v. Alton Steamship Co., 608 F.2d 96, 107 (4th Cir. 1979)(remanded with instructions to vacate portion of the judgment which the complaint did not establish); Fong v. United States, 300 F.2d 400 , 414 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 370 U.S. 938 (1962) (trial court properly granted motion to delete damages …
discussed
Cited "see"
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
County Of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Company
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wade R. Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Association
See Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 197 , 97 S.Ct. 451, 456-57 , 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976). 12 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 1 Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'n, 695 F.2d 1126 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 79 , 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983); Winckel v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'n, Civ.
discussed
Cited "see"
Resnick v. Resnick
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 79 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 77 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Texarkana National Bank
(4×)
See Wells Fargo Business Credit v. Ben Kozloff, Inc., 695 F.2d 940 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 78 (2d Cir.1982) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); Continental Insurance Co. v. Mercadante, 222 A.D. 181, 186 , 225 N.Y.S. 488, 494 (1st Dep’t 1927).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Tarkanian
(2×)
See Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Association, 695 F. 2d 1126 (CA9 1982), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 818 (1983); Louisiana High School Athletic Association v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Foe v. Cuomo
See Id. at 69 n. 10; National Super Spuds v. New York Mercantile Exchange, 660 F.2d 9 , 20 (2d Cir.1981) (in reviewing settlement, court has responsibility to protect class members who cannot protect themselves). 3 Keeping in mind that the law favors settlement, Weinberger, 693 F.2d at 73, especially in class actions, In re Warner Communications Securities Litigation, 618 F.Supp. 735, 740 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 798 F.2d 35 (2d Cir.1986), the Court must decide whether a proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, by comparing the terms of the compromise with the likely rewards of lit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Camp v. Union Manufacturing Co.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S. Ct. 77 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. Novo Industri A/S
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 91 F.R.D. 494, 496 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (“Plaintiffs’ position with respect to each claim in this case is not so strong that settlement should be lightly rejected.”), modified on other grounds, 698 F.2d 61 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.
(2×)
See Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing v. Best Seam Inc., 694 F.2d 570, 578 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 78 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
in All Cases which have been Consolidated into this Proceeding by Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation v. Union Carbide Corp.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Custom Fuel Services, Inc. v. Lombas Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 75 (2d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 510.05 at 510-12 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see"
A.L.T. Corporation v. Small Business Administration
(2×)
See Fehlhaber v. Fehlhaber, 681 F.2d 1015, 1020 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 79 , 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reeled Tubing, Inc. v. M/v Chad G, Her Engines, Etc., in Rem, Guilbeau Marine, Inc., Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc., in Personam
(2×)
See Platoro Ltd., Inc. v. Unidentified Remains, Etc., 695 F.2d 893, 906-07 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); see also King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. NP Sunbonnet, 724 F.2d 1181, 1187 (5th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence v. Pickens
(2×)
Accord Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61 , 69 n. 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); Simer v. Rios, 661 F.2d 655, 665 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 917 , 102 S.Ct. 1773 , 72 L.Ed.2d 177 (1982); Piambino v. Bailey, 610 F.2d 1306, 1327 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1011 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 469 (1980); Pete v. United Mine Workers of Am.
cited
Cited "see"
National Resources Trading, Inc. v. Trans Freight Lines
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 76-77 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joan M. Klein v. The Unidentified Wrecked and Abandoned Sailing Vessel, Etc.
(2×)
See id. at 901 n. 9.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atochem v. United States
Browning Debentures Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir.1977); see Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 80 . (2d Cir.1982), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); Nemeroff v. Abelson, 620 F.2d 339, 348 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dow Chemical Pacific Ltd. v. Rascator Maritime S.A.
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 80 (2d Cir.1982) (there exists an exceptional power to shift fees where an action has been commenced or conducted in “bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly or for oppressive reasons.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); see also Faraci v. Hickey-Freeman Co., 607 F.2d 1025, 1028 (2d Cir.1979) (equitable principles governing award of attorneys fees to do justice are not displaced by legislative authority to award fees.).
cited
Cited "see"
Malchman v. Davis
See Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 74, 79 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Saylor v. Bastedo
Co., 627 F.2d 631, 633 (2d Cir.1980)); see Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73-74 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Coyne v. Weinberger, - U.S. -, 104 S. Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America v. Holcim (US) Inc.
See, e.g., Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 73 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
(2×)
See, e.g., Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 77 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983) (class expanded prior to certification to include added claims, which then were released upon payment of part of settlement proceeds). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. Rubin
(2×)
See, e.g., Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 70-71 (2d Cir.1982) (citing Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 657 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); see also Granin v. International House of Pancakes, 513 F.2d 114, 121-22 (8th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 864 , 96 S.Ct. 124 , 46 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Christopher
(2×)
See, e.g., Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61, 70-71 (2d Cir.1982) (citing Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 657 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 818 , 104 S.Ct. 77 , 78 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983); see also, Grunin v. International House of Pancakes, 513 F.2d 114, 120 (8th Cir.1975) (“the mechanics of the notice process are left to the discretion of the court subject to the broad ‘reasonableness’ standards imposed by due process”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 864 , 96 S.Ct. 124 , 46 L.Ed.2d 93 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ben Kozloff, Inc.
v.
Wells Fargo Business Credit
v.
Wells Fargo Business Credit
No. 82-1867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (4) · S.D. Ohio (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.