green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Moskowitz v. Lopp
But see Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 410-12 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insiders owe no fiduciary duty to option traders); Starkman v. Warner Communications, Inc., 671 F.Supp. 297 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Atlanta Obstetrics & Gynecology Group v. Abelson
Respect for life and the rights proceeding from it are at the heart of our legal system and, broader still, our civilization.’ ” Fulton-DeKalb Hosp., supra at 444.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jackson v. Bumgardner
Raja v. Michael Reese Hospital, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 *753 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Estate Preservation Services
(2×)
See Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983); United States v. Buttorff, 761 F.2d 1056, 1059 (5th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Nationsmart Corporation Securities Litigation
See Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407 , 413 n. 4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Jack Carlon v. Michael E. Thaman
See Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407 , 413 n. 4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell v. Standard Corp.
(2×)
See Tom Olesker’s Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 61 Ill.2d 129 , 334 N.E.2d 160, 164 (1975) (“In claimed libels involving, for example, magazines, books, newspapers, and radio and television programs,- the publication has been for public attention and knowledge and the *265 person commented on, if only in his role as a member of the public, has had access to such published information.”); accord Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 698 F.2d 1022 , 1028 & n. 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1988); McGuiness v. Moto…
cited
Cited "see"
Dr. Patricia Schloesser v. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment and Stanley C. Grant
See Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 698 F.2d 1022, 1029 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
470 Stratford Holding Co. v. Local 32B-32J, Service Employees International Union
See Pari-Mutuel Clerks Union of Louisiana, Local 328 v. Fair Grounds Corp., 703 F.2d 913 , 918 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
ACF Industries, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Oregon
(2×)
See Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 865 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983) (different section of the Act interpreted broadly to accomplish congressional purpose of eliminating discriminatory taxation of property).
discussed
Cited "see"
Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon
(2×)
See Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 865 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983) (different section of the Act interpreted broadly to accomplish congressional purpose of eliminating discriminatory taxation of property).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Gerald D. Bair, Director of the Department of Revenue of Iowa
(2×)
See Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983) (citing Lennen, 640 F.2d at 259-61).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard M. Rosenthal v. Jane Fonda
(2×)
See Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 698 F.2d 1022, 1025 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Data Controls North, Inc. v. Financial Corp. of America
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Starkman v. Warner Communications, Inc., 671 F.Supp. 297, 304 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (quoting Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 412 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Starkman v. Warner Communications, Inc.
See Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corporation, 704 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (insiders trading in corporation stock owed no duty to disclose or abstain to purchaser of call options and, therefore, purchaser had no standing to allege violations of the Securities and Exchange Act); Deutschman v. Beneficial Corporation, 668 F.Supp. 358 (D.Del.1987) (purchaser of call options lacked standing to assert claim of misrepresentations and omissions by corporation where no insider traded in options or in corporation stock); Bianco v. Texas Instrumen…
discussed
Cited "see"
John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & Howell
(2×)
Decisions by state intermediate appellate courts are data which are “not to be disregarded by a federal court unless it is convinced by other persuasive data that the highest court of the state would decide otherwise.” Estrella, 682 F.2d at 817 (quoting West v. AT & T Co., 311 U.S. 223, 236-37 , 61 S.Ct. 179, 183 , 85 L.Ed. 139 (1940)); accord Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, 698 F.2d 1022 , 1026 (9th Cir.) (“in the absence of convincing evidence”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re ORFA Securities Litigation
(2×)
See Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 698 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Petrelli
(2×)
See Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 869 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (citing Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v. Lennen, 640 F.2d 255, 258-61 (10th Cir.1981)); Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Hunt, 591 F.2d 1211, 1220 (7th Cir.1979); see also Securities & Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc., 515 F.2d 801, 808 (2d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. State Board of Equalization
(2×)
See, also, Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 511 F.Supp. 553 (N.D.Cal.1981) (stating that § 306 of the 4-R Act preempts discriminatory state tax law), modified 697 F.2d 860 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 ; State of Tenn. v. Louisville & N.R.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
C.S. v. Nielson
(4×)
See, e.g., Cockrum v. Baumgartner, 95 Ill.2d 193 , 69 Ill.Dec. 168 , 447 N.E.2d 385 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983) (public policy considerations dictate that a healthy child's birth is a benefit to parents); Beardsley v. Wierdsma, 650 P.2d 288 (Wyo. 1982) (bond of affection between parent *518 and child should not be measured by some misplaced attempt to assess a dollar value on child's life); Public Health Trust v. Brown, 388 So.2d 1084 (Fla. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Time, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Fleury v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 698 F.2d 1022, 1027 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983) (holding that “in the case of a single, integrated publication, [the cause of action] accrues on the first general distribution of the publication to the public”); Wildmon v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 508 F.Supp. 87, 91 (N.D.Miss.1980) (statute of limitations begins to run for mass-distributed monthly periodical on a single date “when the periodical is substantially distributed to the public”); Khaury v. Playboy Publications, Inc., 430 F.S…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Flynn v. Associated Press
See, e.g., Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 698 F.2d 1022 , 1028-1029 n.4 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 846 (1983); Morgan v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 653 F. Supp. 711, 717 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levinson v. Basic Inc.
See also Laventhall v. General Dynamics, 704 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insider trading, no public statement); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713 (8th Cir.1978) (misrepresentations surrounding the initial offering of corporate bonds, a situation in which price is not a reflection of the transactions of investors). 48 The situation before us is clearly not analogous to these cases.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levinson v. Basic Inc.
See also Laventhall v. General Dynamics, 704 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insider trading, no public statement); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713 (8th Cir.1978) (misrepresentations surrounding the initial offering of corporate bonds, a situation in which price is not a reflection of the transactions of investors).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drobbin v. Nicolet Instrument Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 511 F.Supp. 553 (N.D.Cal.1981), aff 'd in part, vac. in part on other grounds, 697 F.2d 860 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (1983) (injunctive relief granted where, due to limitation on interest rate to be paid by state defendant, monetary damages held to be “inherently inadequate because the defendant would not be required to fully respond in damages”); Teamsters Freight Local Union No. 480 v. Southern Forwarding Co., 424 F.Supp. 11 , 13 and n. 13 (M.D.Tenn.1976) (“Insolvency of a defend…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Warner Communications Securities Litigation
Compare In re Digital Equipment Securities Litigation, 601 F.Supp. 311, 315 (D.Mass.1984) (upholding such claims) and Bachman v. Polaroid Corp., 540 F.Supp. 667, 671 (D.Mass.1982) (same) with Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.) (dismissing claim), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) and In re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Securities Litigation, 567 F.Supp. 126, 127 (E.D.Mo.1983) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fleury
v.
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
v.
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
No. 83-13.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.