green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Meadowbrook Center, Inc. v. Buchman
he defendant who has wrongfully broken a contract should not be permitted to reap advantage from his own wrong by insisting on proof which by reason of his breach is unobtainable
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Palmer v. Murphy
damages for lost profits need not be proved with mathematical certainty, provided an award has a rational basis in the evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission
applies to issues which require reference to the evidence and not to matters which are strictly questions of law.
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald Jones v. Augustine Warren
See Segrest v. Segrest, 649 S.W.2d 610, 611 (Tex.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 (1983); In re L.C.H., 80 S.W.3d 689, 691 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Houston
See Case, 884 P.2d at 1277 & n. 5 (emphasizing that only the originating officer is required to have reasonable suspicion and that the second officer may accept the information "at face value"). ¶19 In State v. Gibson, 665 P.2d 1302 (Utah 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983), the Utah Supreme Court upheld a level two traffic stop under similar cireumstances.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re JAB
See Segrest v. Segrest, 649 S.W.2d 610, 611 (Tex.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Interest of J.A.B.
See Segrest v. Segrest, 649 S.W.2d 610, 611 (Tex.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.
See Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distrib., Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 821 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983); Computer Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
Serpa Corp. v. McWane, Inc.
See generally, Jay Edwards Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, Inc., 708 F.2d 814 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983). 3 The mere fact that a plaintiffs rivals merge to the detriment of a competitor does not alone grant the competitor standing.
cited
Cited "see"
Sign-A-Way, Inc. v. Mechtronics Corp.
See Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distrib., Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 819 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sams v. HUD
See Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distrib., Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 819 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 (1983); Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldie Sams Andrew Brooks v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
See Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distrib., Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 819 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 (1983); Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 (1971). 16 This case has been submitted on briefs on Petitioners' motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trahan v. Trahan
See Segrest v. Segrest, 649 S.W.2d 610 (Tex.1983) (McCarty decision did not require retroactive application to divorce decrees finalized before decision), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983); Breen v. Breen, 693 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (res judicata applied to bar collateral attack after McCarty decision, but before USFSPA); Allison v. Allison, 690 S.W.2d 340 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1985) (USFSPA was permissive and res judicata barred subsequent reopening of litigation), writ ref’d n.r.e., 700 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Emma J. Trahan v. Jack F. Trahan
See Segrest v. Segrest , 649 S.W.2d 610 (Tex. 1983) ( McCarty decision did not require retroactive application to divorce decrees finalized before decision), cert. denied , 464 U.S. 894 (1983); Breen v. Breen , 693 S.W.2d 495 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (res judicata applied to bar collateral attack after McCarty decision, but before USFSPA); Allison v. Allison , 690 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1985 (USFSPA was permissive and res judicata barred subsequent reopening of litigation), writ ref'd n.r.e., 700 S.W.2d 914 (Tex. 1985). 3.
examined
Cited "see"
Medina v. Town and Country Ford, Inc.
(3×)
See Kerr v. First Commodity Corp. of Boston, 735 F. 2d 281 (8th Cir. 1984) and Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, 708 F. 2d 814 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chuck's Feed & Seed Co., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Company
See Bostick Oil Co. v. Michelin Tire Corp., 702 F.2d 1207, 1220 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983). 27 It is true that the district court directed a verdict on Lambert's state common law action for wrongful termination.
cited
Cited "see"
Chuck's Feed & Seed Co. v. Ralston Purina Co.
See Bostick Oil Co. v. Michelin Tire Corp., 702 F.2d 1207, 1220 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stamps v. Ford Motor Co.
Even if a defendant can be termed a manufacturer, it cannot be held directly liable unless it is a party to the franchise agreement. 15 U.S.C. § 1221 (b); see Olson Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp., 703 F.2d 284 , 287 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 240 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983); York Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 447 F.2d 786, 791 (5th Cir. 1971); Bonnano v. Chrysler Corp., 603 F.Supp. 832, 835 (S.D.Ohio 1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Midwest Petroleum v. American Petrofina Marketing
See generally, Jay Edward, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, 708 F.2d 814 (1st Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 (1983); Kingsport Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Motor Corp., 644 F.2d 566 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.
Compare Jay Edwards Inc. v. New England Toyota Dis tributor, Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 821-22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983) (defendant could not object to jury’s reasonable interpretation of plaintiffs damages evidence after the fact when it could have come forward with its own evidence) with Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp., 156 F.3d 136, 142-45 (2d Cir.1998) (allowing remand for recalculation of damages when district court based calculation on unforeseen theory and neither party had opportunity to present evidence; distinguishing situation where a party o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonham State Bank v. Beadle
See, e.g., Segrest v. Segrest, 649 S.W.2d 610, 611-12 (Tex.1983) (disapproving use of a declaratory judgment as a tool to collaterally attack a final divorce decree), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.
See, e.g., Olson Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp., 703 F.2d 284, 289 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 240 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983) (sole stockholder of corporate dealership who had personally guaranteed corporate obligations lacked standing); Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd., 601 F.2d 429, 439 (9th Cir.1979) (sole stockholder of corporate dealership who had personally guaranteed corporate obligations lacked standing); Vincel v. White Motor Corp., 521 F.2d 1113, 1120 (2nd Cir.1975) (‘When, as here, a dealership is doing business in corporate form, the statute contains…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carolina Cable Network v. Alert Cable TV, Inc.
See also Bostick Oil Co. v. Michelin Tire Corp., 702 F. (2d) 1207 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed. (2d) 232 (1983) (jury entitled to determine whether distributor terminated in furtherance of anti-competitive purposes). *104 Id. at 315.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schott Motorcycle Supply, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
See Zapatha v. Dairy Mart, Inc., 381 Mass. 284 , 408 N.E.2d 1370, 1378 (Mass.1980) (oral representations are relevant to issue of good or bad faith under the Uniform Commercial Code even if the representations cannot be used to vary terms of written agreement); see also Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 817-19 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983) (distributor’s alleged harassment of dealer, including wrongful accusations and lies, presented jury issue as to whether distributor had engaged in conduct which is arb…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School District
(2×)
See also Segrest v. Segrest, 649 S.W.2d 610, 612 (Tex.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richland Wholesale Liquors v. Glenmore Distilleries Company Mr. Boston Distiller Corporation Foreign Vintages, Inc., and Foremost McKesson Inc.
See also, Bostick Oil Co. v. Michelin Tire Corp., 702 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 242 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983) (jury entitled to determine whether distributor terminated in furtherance of anticompetitive purposes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larsen v. A.C. Carpenter, Inc.
See, e.g., Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, Inc., 708 F.2d 814 , 820 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S.Ct. 241 , 78 L.Ed.2d 231 (1983) (“[T]he bulk of plaintiff’s evidence came from ...
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bissonette
“Rule 103 adopts Wigmore’s position that a specific objection made on the wrong grounds and overruled precludes a party from raising a specific objection on other, tenable grounds on appeal.” Id. ¶ 103 [02], at 103-22 to 103-23 (footnote omitted) ; see, e.g., Jay Edwards, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, Inc., 708 F.2d 814, 823 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 894 , 104 S. Ct. 241 (1983) (where defendant objected, unsuccessfully, only on relevancy grounds, court would not reverse on grounds of prejudice where evidence was not completely irrelevant and defendant failed to alert …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Georgia State Board of Naturopathic Examiners
v.
Bowers, Attorney General of Georgia
v.
Bowers, Attorney General of Georgia
No. 83-232.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1983.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.