green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.2 score
“he fairness of the trial and not the culpability of the prosecutor is the standard for analyzing the constitutional due process claims of criminal defendants alleging prosecutorial misconduct”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Burton
he fairness of the trial and not the culpability of the prosecutor is the standard for analyzing the constitutional due process claims of criminal defendants alleging prosecutorial misconduct
cited
Cited "see"
L.P. v. Wake County Board of Education
See Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817, 819 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 (‘‘[w]e have often held that a prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks obviates any possible harm to the defendant’’), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
(2×)
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 (“[w]here a prosecutor in argument interjects remarks deliberately intended to undermine the rulings of the trial court to the prejudice of the defendant, his conduct is so offensive to the sound administration of justice that only a new trial can effectively prevent such assaults on the integrity of the tribunal”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Payne
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 567-68 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tok
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 567-68 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Warholic
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 (“a prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks obviates any possible harm to the defendant”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dews
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559 , 566-57 & n.5, 462 A.2d 1001 , cert, denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jarrett
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 (“prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks obviates any possible harm to the defendant”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 570 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Downing
See State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 567-68 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Ubaldi, [ 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Satchwell
The defendant made no claim at trial, and he makes no claim on appeal, that the cautionary instruction given to the jury was incomplete or otherwise defective. “[W]e have previously recognized that a prompt cautionary instruction to the jury regarding improper prosecutorial remarks or questions can obviate any possible harm to the defendant.” St ate v. Cruz, 212 Conn. 351, 365 , 562 A.2d 1071 (1989); see State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 563 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Rogerson v. Fitzpatrick
See Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817, 819 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Richardson
Further, in addressing the jury “ ‘[c]ounsel must be allowed a generous latitude in argument, as the limits of legitimate argument and fair comment cannot be determined precisely by rule and line, and something must be allowed for the zeal of counsel in the heat of argument.’ State v. Laudano, 74 Conn. 638, 646 , 51 A. 860 (1902); see State v. Greenberg, 92 Conn. 657, 663 , 103 A. 897 (1918).” State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stott v. Martin
See Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 722 F.2d 1307 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, Lindsey v. Kelly, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983) (City Park Superintendent of Employment not protected, court persuaded that the Park Superintendent was a policymaker, had broad discretion, broad authority, and worked closely with high ranking city officials); see also Ecker v. Cohalan, 542 F.Supp. 896 (E.D.N.Y.1982) (position of Chief Deputy Commissioner of Parks, Conservation and Recreation for the County, described by the court as high powered, high salaried with cons…
cited
Cited "see"
Allen Blair Smith v. Warren D. Moberg, Fbi Agent Richard Mayo, Fbi Agent Charles J. Bookstein, Fbi Agent James K. Howell, Fbi Agent Joseph W. McGinnis Fbi Agent George T. Quinn, Fbi Agent Harold Lee Butler, Maryland State Police Leslie J. Payne, Former Chief Carl Webster, Lieutenant Colbourne Dakes Officer Niblett Harold Gray, T.F.C. Nina Marie Anderson William R. Holloway Nathan Stern Gerard P. Martin, United States Attorney Joseph H. Young, United States District Court Judge Fulton P. Jeffers, Former State Attorney Richard M. Pollett James P. Bailey, United States Magistrate Other Unknown Named
See Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 (1983)
discussed
Cited "see"
Sattler v. Johnson
See Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817, 819 (4th Cir.) (cause of action does not accrue until plaintiff exercising due diligence should have discovered factual basis for cause of action), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sattler v. Johnson
See Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817, 819 (4th Cir.) (cause of action does not accrue until plaintiff exercising due diligence should have discovered factual basis for cause of action), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
R. Dement J.H. Hines V.N. Meekins L.A. Koenig v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company United Transportation Union
(2×)
Accord, in a non-labor context, Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817, 819 (4th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983). 49 Appellants assert that their cause of action did not accrue until June 29, 1986, the date which appellants had agreed with UTU Vice-President Harden would be the last date for Harden to inform appellants that the dispute over amending the Crew Consist Agreement "had finally been equitably resolved." According to appellants, it was only at that point that the union grievance procedure had been exhausted.
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Electric Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner
See Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co., 699 F.2d 1292, 1307 (9th Cir.) (no showing that trial court gave “determinative weight” to challenged evidence), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 280, 78 L.Ed.2d 259 (1983); Pursche v. Atlas Scraper & Engineering Co., 300 F.2d 467, 487-88 (9th Cir.1961) (in nonjury trial, admission of incompetent evidence not grounds for reversal where there is competent evidence to support the findings), ce rt. denied, 371 U.S. 911 , 83 S.Ct. 251 , 9 L.Ed.2d 170 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Electric Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Frank Prestipino and Leana Prestipino, Hildegard K. Marks, and Jean D. Littlefield v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co., 699 F.2d 1292, 1307 (9th Cir.) (no showing that trial court gave "determinative weight" to challenged evidence), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 280, 78 L.Ed.2d 259 (1983); Pursche v. Atlas Scraper & Engineering Co., 300 F.2d 467, 487-88 (9th Cir.1961) (in nonjury trial, admission of incompetent evidence not grounds for reversal where there is competent evidence to support the findings), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 911 , 83 S.Ct. 251 , 9 L.Ed.2d 170 (1962). 23 We conclude that the Tax Court's finding that the trusts and partnerships …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Elson
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 572, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 (supervisoiy power invoked to reverse judgment of conviction on basis of prosecutorial impropriety), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reynolds
See, e.g., State v. Ubaldi, [ 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Payne
See, e.g., State v. Ubaldi, [ 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rohlsen
See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 708 F.2d 121, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 (1983) (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973) as setting forth the relevant contours of what constitutes voluntary consent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Munoz
Rule 804 (a) lists five situations in which the declarant witness may be considered unavailable: (1) the court has determined that the witness has a testimonial privilege; (2) the witness persists in refusing to testify despite a court order to do so; (3) the witness has a lack of memory; (4) the witness is unable to be present or testify because of death or existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; and (5) the witness is ‘absent from the hearing and the proponent of his statement has been unable to procure his attendance ... [or testimony] by process or other reasonable means.’ �…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamond v. Chulay
See also Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 722 F.2d 1307 (7th Cir.) (second in command position of Park Superintendent of Employment exempt), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael S. Antoon John A. Bettor Xavier W. Folino D/B/A Fairview Pharmacy
See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 708 F.2d 121, 125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983) (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973) as setting forth the relevant contours of what constitutes voluntary consent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kikumura, Yu
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 708 F.2d 121, 126 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983); see also id. at 127 (Gibbons, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert E. Chapman, Sr. Lillian Chapman, His Wife v. United States
See also Blanck v. McKeen, 707 F.2d 817, 819 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 (1983). 7 It is clear that Chapman knew of the pain he was allegedly suffering long before 1979, for he had been complaining to physicians at the Veterans Administration about it.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Herring
In argument before the jury, “trial counsel should not state or suggest an inference from facts that are not in evidence.” State v. Manley, 195 Conn. 567, 580 , 489 A.2d 1024 (1985); see also State v. Ubaldi, 190 Conn. 559, 575 , 462 A.2d 1001 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S. Ct. 280 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rateree v. Rockett
See also Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 722 F.2d 1307, 1310 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 916 , 104 S.Ct. 279 , 78 L.Ed.2d 258 (1983) (purpose of policymaker exception “is to ensure that the first amendment’s protection not interfere with the workings of democratic governments and the ability of duly elected officials to implement their policies”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelly
v.
United States and Kelly v. United States
v.
United States and Kelly v. United States
No. 83-285; No. 83-5296.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 708 F. 2d 121.