green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.7 score
“t is only the right of redemption, rather than the property itself, which passes into the bankruptcy estate if the redemption period has not expired at the time of the bankruptcy petition is filed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duprey v. Eagle Lake Water & Sewer District
t is only the right of redemption, rather than the property itself, which passes into the bankruptcy estate if the redemption period has not expired at the time of the bankruptcy petition is filed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Childress v. Middleton Arms, Ltd. Partnership (In Re Middleton Arms, Ltd. Partnership)
although a bankruptcy court is essentially a court of equity, its broad equitable powers may only be exercised in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the code.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Wells Properties, Inc.
congress intended 362(a) to prohibit only certain types of affirmative actions ...
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Houghtaling
See State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 229 , 240–42, 456 A.2d 288 (1983) (holding that commercial tenant possessed reasonable expectation of privacy in space he had leased to use as restaurant), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Houghtaling
See State v. Zindros , 189 Conn. 228 , 229, 240-42, 456 A.2d 288 (1983) (holding that commercial tenant possessed reasonable expectation of privacy in space he had leased to use as restaurant), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1014 , 79 L.Ed.2d 244 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables, XIV, LLC (In Re Rosenberg)
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Texas Consumer Finance Corp., 480 F.2d 1261, 1265 (5th Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Azukas
See State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 246-47 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Augustus Mayfield v. Commonwealth
See State v. Zindros, 456 A.2d 288, 296-97 (Conn. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 (1984). -8- The majority thereafter concludes, however, that Mayfield’s subjective expectation of privacy was not objectively reasonable or one that society is willing to recognize as legitimate because he “dropped it in a quasi-public place and [because] . . . any passerby could have discovered it and picked it up . . . .” I do not concur in the conclusion that Mayfield’s expectation of privacy in the tissue paper was not objectively reasonable simply because he dropped it in a quasi-public place.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Eady
Ed. 153 (1948); see State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 237-38 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Insurance Co. v. Sheldon
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Diversified Washes of Vandalia, Inc.
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 , 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 [ 79 L.Ed.2d 245 ], (1984) [additional citations omitted].
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
(2×)
See Garris v. United States, 465 A.2d 817, 822 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1013 , 79 L.Ed.2d 243 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mooney
Although we have, in a fourth amendment context, used the term “abandonment” in its common law sense of a voluntary and intentional renunciation of ownership; see State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 240 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Tudor Motor Lodge Associates, Ltd. Partnership
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Whispering Bay Campground, Inc. v. Fagan
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Whispering Bay Campground, Inc.
See Johnson v. First Nat'l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 12 Accordingly, the lower courts' decision to lift the bankruptcy code's automatic stay is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hood v. Williams (In Re Hood)
See, Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Fisher v. First Union Mortgage Corp. (In re Fisher) 80 B.R. 58, 62 (Bankr.M.D.N.C.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
McColley v. Rosenberg (In Re Candor Diamond Corp.)
See Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flying \S\" Land & Cattle Co. v. Beaumont (In Re Flying \"S\" Land & Cattle Co.)"
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (appealed on other grounds), citing In re Interstate Restaurant Systems, Inc., 26 B.R. 298, 301 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1982) and In re Santa Fe Development, 16 B.R. 165, 167 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert B. Sutton and Sutton Investments, Inc.
See Johnson v. First Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Texas Consumer Finance Corp., 480 F.2d 1261, 1265 (5th Cir.1973). 19 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Murphy
See State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 236-38 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
J.L. Lavender and Mary Lavender, Individually, and J.L. Lavender D/B/A Lavender Construction Company v. Wood Law Firm
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Monte *249 video, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 3 Here, appellant clearly failed to comply with the notice and application requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lavender v. Wood Law Firm
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 3 Here, appellant clearly failed to comply with the notice and application requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Torres
See State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 238 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacques
See, e.g., United States v. Stevenson, supra, 396 F.3d 545 . ‘‘A reasonable expectation of privacy is one that is legitimate.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 239 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kelly, No. Cv-99-0070159-S (Aug. 25, 2000)
See Frazier v. Cupp , 394 U.S. 731 , 740 , 89 S.Ct. 1420 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969) (holding that a joint user may consent to a search); see also State v. Zindros , 189 Conn. 228 , 250 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1014 , 79 L.Ed.2d 244 (1984) (finding that a co-owner may authorize the search of jointly held possessions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Constitution Bank v. Flanders, No. Cv 910310164s (Mar. 22, 1995)
Although the majority of courts have concluded that the stay imposed pursuant to § 362(a) does not toll the running of a redemption period; see, e.g., Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Tabor Enterprises, Inc. v. People of the State of Ill., 65 B.R. 42 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
USM Workers' Committee v. Decker (In Re USM Technology Corp.)
In re B & W Enter., Inc., 713 F.2d 534 (1983); In re Pacific Express, Inc., 69 B.R. 112, 115 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1986); see also Johnson v. First Natl Bank, 719 F.2d 270 , 273 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zeoli v. RIHT Mortgage Corp.
See, e.g., Johnson v. First Nat'l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (Bankruptcy Code may not be invoked to toll or suspend the running of a statutory period of redemption created by state law absent fraud, mistake, accident or erroneous conduct by the foreclosing officer. 11 U.S.C. 105(a)). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell
See also Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minnesota, 719 F.2d 270, 273-75 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). .In Butner , the Court struck down a uniform federal rule of law that altered the property rights of a mortgagee as they existed at state law.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois Service Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Academy of St. James College Preparatory
See also Johnson v. First National Bank (8th Cir. 1983), 719 F.2d 270 , 276, cert, denied (1984), 465 U.S. 1012 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Sabec
If a debtor desires to retain an interest in real property sold at a valid foreclosure sale, the plan must provide for the payment of the entire redemption amount within the later of (1) the redemption period fixed by state law, 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b)(1), or (2) sixty days after the debtor files the bankruptcy petition (assuming the redemption period has not already expired). 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b)(2); see also, Johnson v. First Natl Bank, 719 F.2d 270 , 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (cited approvingly, Glenn, 760 F.2d at 1440). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. United States
See, e.g., Garris v. United States, 465 A.2d 817, 823 (D.C.1983) fre-mand for resentencing where defendant convicted of felony murder and underlying felony), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1013 , 79 L.Ed.2d 243 (1984); see also Garris v. United States, 491 A.2d 511, 514-15 (D.C.1985) (discussing policy behind remand procedure), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993 , 107 S.Ct. 595 , 93 L.Ed.2d 595 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Plaza De Diego Shopping Center, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Robert L. Coley, Esquire. In Re Petition of Robert L. Coley, Etc
See, e.g., Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273-75 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1983) (bankruptcy court lacked authority under general equitable power section, 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a) to stay indefinitely expiration of statutory redemption period created by state law in connection with real estate mortgage foreclosure).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nejberger v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (In Re Nejberger)
See also Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reagan
As a question of fact, it is normally to be decided by the trial court upon the evidence before that court together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn from that evidence.’ Dotson v. Warden, supra, 619 ; see also State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 238 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983) [cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Memphis-Friday's Associates
Id.; see also ftn. 15, at p. 1215, where the Moody court observed that application of Section 108(b) would “cause irreconcilable conflict between the two sections,” citing Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 8 Additionally, Congress clearly was aware of the existence of Section 108(b) when the 1984 Amendments were enacted; therefore, the omission of any reference to Section 108(b) is significant.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
Compare State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228 , 254 n.32, 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Weathercraft Company of Topeka, Inc.
See, e.g., NLRB v. Joseph Magnin Co., 704 F.2d 1457, 1462 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1014 , 79 L.Ed.2d 244 (1984); NLRB v. Atlantic Int’l Corp., 664 F.2d 1231 , 1233 (4th Cir.1981); Leeds & *1233 Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874, 879-80 (3d Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)
See also Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Friarton Estates Corp. v. City of New York (In Re Friarton Estates Corp.)
See also, Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Martin
Ed. 2d 721 (1984); see also State v. Zindros, 189 Conn. 228, 253-54 , 456 A.2d 288 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S. Ct. 1014 , 79 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stapf
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-5937.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.