Koehler v. Engle, 466 U.S. 1 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Koehler v. Engle, 466 U.S. 1 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
212 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bridges v. State, 492 S.E.2d 877 (Ga. 1997)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
104 S. Ct. at 1673 Declining to address erroneous charge shifting burden of persuasion1 citing caseaffirming without opinion by an equally divided court, Justice Marshall not participating1 citing court put it this way
  • Bush v. Stephenson, 669 F. Supp. 1322 (E.D.N.C. 1986).published
    (affirming without opinion by an equally divided court, Justice Marshall not participating)
At page 105 Deferential standard for judging counsel's representation1 citing case
  • Bentz v. Wainwright, No. 3:19-cv-01203 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2022). 2 cites
    “Even under de novo review, the standard for judging counsel’s representation is a most deferential one.” Id. at 105.
Other citing cases15 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Show 5 more citing cases
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Koehler, Warden
v.
Engle
83-1.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1984.
Published opinion
466 U.S. 1
1984 U.S. LEXIS 48
Per Curiam.
Cited by 39 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Georgia (3)
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General of Michigan, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, and Thomas C. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General.

John Nussbaumer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the decision of this case.