green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184 , 1189 n. 2 (9th Cir.1984) ("[T]he elements for establishing a [tying] violation under each provision are virtually the same."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); Detroit City Dairy, Inc. v. Kowalski Sausage Co., 393 F.Supp. 453, 458 (E.D.Mich.1975) ("With respect to [the tying] definition, there is no need to differentiate between the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
discussed
Cited "see"
De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Airweld, Inc. v. Aireo, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184 , 1189 n. 2 (9th Cir.1984) (“[T]he elements for establishing a [tying] violation under each provision are virtually the same.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); Detroit City Dairy, Inc. v. Kowalski Sausage Co., 393 F.Supp. 453, 458 (E.D.Mich.1975) (“With respect to [the tying] definition, there is no need to differentiate between the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hunter
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 164-65 (2d Cir.1984) (holding that the place where false agricultural documents were made was proper venue), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Herberman, 583 F.2d 222, 227 (5th Cir.1978) (holding that the place where false medical payment request documents were filled out, executed, and mailed was the proper venue).
cited
Cited "see"
Hispanics for Fair & Equitable Reapportionment (H-FERA) v. Griffin
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 164 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Stein, 544 F.2d 96, 104 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hispanics For Fair And Equitable Reapportionment (H-Fera) v. Griffin
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 164 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Stein, 544 F.2d 96, 104 (2d Cir.1976). 8 We vacate the district court's judgment and remand the actions to Chief Judge Michael Telesca of the Western District of New York with instructions to refer the actions to another district court judge for further proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Helen Phillips v. Alaska Hotel And Restaurant Employees Pension Fund
See Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir.1984) (defining and applying the "continuing violation" rationale in an antitrust context), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees Pension Fund
See Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir.1984) (defining and applying the “continuing violation” rationale in an antitrust context), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. State
See United States v. Fuentes-Coba, 738 F.2d 1191, 1198 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1186 , 84 L.Ed.2d 333 (1985) (defendant cannot expressly pass up opportunities to cure defect in jury composition and then seek to reverse trial court because of defect); Casimiro v. State, 557 So.2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 567 So.2d 434 (Fla.1990) (defendant waived objections and motions concerning jury composition when defendant expressly stated that he wanted the jury); Springer v. State, 513 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (defendant waived objection since he failed to objec…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian
(4×)
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 165 (2d Cir.1984) (venue under § 1001 lies either where documents were prepared or filed), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d at 1173; see United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 167 (2d Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d at 1173 ; see United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 167 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Schmutz v. Bolles
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 166 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); Matter of Ollag Constr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Casimiro v. State
See United States v. Fuentes-Coba, 738 F.2d 1191, 1198 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1186 , 84 L.Ed.2d 333 (1985) (defendant cannot expressly pass up an opportunity to cure a defect in jury composition and then urge the trial court be reversed because of defect); see also Hair v. State, 428 So.2d 760, 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Williams v. State, 101 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona Zang
See In re Wetzel, 143 Ariz. 35 , 691 P.2d 1063 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985) (misrepresentations to client); In re Blankenburg, 143 Ariz. 365 , 694 P.2d 195 (1984) (failure to communicate and neglect of client’s affairs); In re Swartz, 141 Ariz. 266 , 686 P.2d 1236 (1984) (excessive fee arrangements).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard G. Freidin
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 166 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); FAA v. Landy, 705 F.2d 624, 633 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 895 , 104 S.Ct. 243 , 78 L.Ed.2d 232 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Saks International, Inc. v. M/V \Export Champion\""
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 166 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Lavin, 480 F.2d 657, 662 (2d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Saks International, Inc. v. M/V \Export Champion\""
See United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 166 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Lavin, 480 F.2d 657, 662 (2d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Taggart v. Rutledge
Accord Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184, 1191 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cedric Parks, A/K/A Governor Fool, A/K/A Fool, Delano Finch, A/K/A Trouble, Roger Stewart, A/K/A Big Rog, A/K/A Heavy
See United States v. Presser, 844 F.2d 1275, 1279-80 (6th Cir. 1988) (order appealable under sec. 3731 despite judge's conditional statement that he would suppress witnesses if Government refused to comply with discovery order); United States v. Horwitz, 622 F.2d 1101, 1104-05 (2d Cir. 1980) (order providing for suppression of witness testimony if Government refused to grant immunity appealable under sec. 3731), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1076 (1981); United States v. Cannone, 528 F.2d 296, 298 (2d Cir. 1975) (order providing for exclusion of witness testimony if witnesses were not identified appe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Parks
See United States v. Presser, 844 F.2d 1275, 1279-80 (6th Cir.1988) (order appealable under § 3731 despite judge’s conditional statement that he would suppress witnesses if Government refused to comply with discovery order); United States v. Horwitz, 622 F.2d 1101, 1104-05 (2d Cir.1980) (order providing for suppression of witness testimony if Government refused to grant immunity appealable under § 3731), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1076 , 101 S.Ct. 854 , 66 L.Ed.2d 799 (1981); United States v. Cannone, 528 F.2d 296, 298 (2d Cir.1975) (order providing for exclusion of witness testimony if witnes…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shawn Thomas, Christopher Reese
See, e.g., United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 166-67 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Gelzer, Robert L. Gelzer and Leon D. Griffin
See, e.g., United States v. Towne, 870 F.2d 880, 888 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1101 , 109 S.Ct. 2456 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1989); see also United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 167 (2d Cir.1984) (“Proof of the connection of an exhibit to the defendants may be made by circumstantial evidence.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur L. Doe, A/K/A \Butchy\""
See Fed.R.Evid. 803(6) (exception applies to “memorandum, ... record, [etc.] ... in any form) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 166 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Ullrich, 580 F.2d 765, 771-72 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Pfeiffer, 539 F.2d 668, 671 (8th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert L. Stephenson
See, e.g., United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 165 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Candella, 487 F.2d 1223, 1227-28 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1563 , 39 L.Ed.2d 872 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donahue, Joseph P.
See, e.g., United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 165 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985) (“‘the decision [in Travis] surely was meant to be confined to the facts on the unusual statute involved’” (citations omitted)); United States v. Herberman, 583 F.2d 222, 227 (5th Cir.1978) (Travis does not mandate that every defendant whose forms are filed in another district must defend there).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wayne N. Collamore, in Re United States of America
See, e.g., United States v. Todaro, 744 F.2d 5 , 8 n. 1 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1186 , 84 L.Ed.2d 333 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chiropractic Cooperative Ass'n of Michigan v. American Medical Ass'n
See also Airweld, Inc. v. Aireo, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chiropractic Cooperative Association Of Michigan v. American Medical Association
See also Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 742 F.2d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Medina-Ramos, United States of America v. Carlos Medina-Alvarez
(2×)
When the statute does not specify venue, the place at which the crime was committed “must be determined from the nature of the crime alleged and the location of the act or acts constituting it.” United States v. Anderson, 328 U.S. 699, 703 , 66 S.Ct. 1213, 1216 , 90 L.Ed. 1529 (1946); see also United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 164 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213 , 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 332 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); Jackson, 482 F.2d at 1178 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen O. Masse
See, e.g., United States v. Mendel, 746 F.2d 155, 167 (2d Cir.1984) (“the prosecution need only prove a rational basis from which to conclude that the exhibit did, in fact, belong to the appellants”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1213, 105 S.Ct. 1184 , 84 L.Ed.2d 331 (1985); United States v. Luna, 585 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.) (“[t]he trial judge [is] entitled to rely on a presumption of official regularity”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 852 , 99 S.Ct. 160 , 58 L.Ed.2d 157 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mendel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-960.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.