green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
28 u.s.c. 2501 is not tolled by the indians' ignorance of their legal rights.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. The United States
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
28 u.s.c. 2501 is not tolled by the indians' ignorance of their legal rights.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson
See Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis.2d 166 , 342 N.W.2d 37 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Roudnahal v. Ridge
See Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 158 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 105 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984); Westlake v. Lucas, 537 F.2d 857, 858 (6th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. United Healthcare of Ohio, Inc.
See Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 158 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 105 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Joyce Loudner v. United States
See Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 726 F.2d 718 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 106 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Loudner v. United States
See Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 726 F.2d 718 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 106 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Terrill Bybee v. Robert Pirtle Betty Box
See Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 160 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine
(2×)
See TP Lab. v. Professional Positioners, Inc., 724 F.2d 965 , 971, 220 USPQ 577, 582 (Fed.Cir.) ("[I]f a prima facie case is made of public use, the patent owner must be able to point to or must come forward with convincing evidence to counter that showing."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984). 15 Neither party disputes that Lough's prototypes were in use before the critical date.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth D. Courtney and Tammy Courtney v. Robert E. Bee Ted Dewolf James B. Quigley and the State of Michigan Department of Social Services
See Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 159 (6th Cir. 1983) (finding no property right where the employer maintained unconditional power to remove an employee from his position), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Uhl v. Swanstrom
See Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 160 (6th Cir.1983), ceH. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 105 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Trimble v. United States
See Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 160 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pro-Choice Network v. Project Rescue Western New York
See, Arnold v. Burger King Corp., 719 F.2d 63, 68-69 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 106 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. United States
See Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 726 F.2d 718, 721 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 106 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984), and cases discussed therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Santana-Camacho
See United States v. Carrasquillo-Plaza, 873 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.1989) (“When a prosecutor ‘misstates facts ... in such a way as to prejudice a defendant, a new trial is required.’ ” (quoting United States v. Pasarell, 727 F.2d 13, 16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984))).
cited
Cited "see"
Conley v. Boyle Drug Co.
See Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis.2d 166, 176-81 , 342 N.W.2d 37, 42-45 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Halstead Industries, Inc.
See Vareka Investments N.V. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., 724 F.2d 907 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Petroleum & Energy Intelligence Weekly, Inc. v. Liscom
See Vareka Investments, N.V. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., 724 F.2d 907, 909-10 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward L. Mixon, Jr. v. Weirton Steel Corporation Weirton Steel Division, National Steel Corporation, Edward L. Mixon, Jr. v. Weirton Steel Corporation, Weirton Steel Division, National Steel Corporation
See Arnold v. Burger King Corp., 719 F.2d 63, 68 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Clifford Corp., N v. v. Ingber
See Vareka Investments, N.V. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., 724 F.2d 907, 909-10 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. Meyer
(2×)
See Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Baldrige, 539 F.Supp. 1307, 1312-14 (E.D.Wis.1982), aff’d, 728 F.2d 915 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 105 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Bloch v. Mountain Mission School
See Arnold v. Burger King Corp., 719 F.2d 63, 65-66 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984); Vandenplas v. City of Muskego, 797 F.2d 425, 429 (7th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States
Spevack v. United States, 182 Ct.Cl. 884, 895 , 390 F.2d 977, 984 (1968); see Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 726 F.2d 718, 721 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 106 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Geo Vann, Inc., Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.
See TP Laboratories, Inc. v. Professional Positioners, Inc., 724 F.2d 965, 971 , 220 USPQ 577, 582 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984) “[I]f a use is experimental, even though not secret, ‘public use’ is negated.”) If the challenged use or sales activities were associated with primarily experimental procedures conducted in the course of completing the invention, as the particular invention may require, a section 102(b) bar does not vest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See TP Laboratories, Inc. v. Professional Positioners, Inc., 724 F.2d 965, 973 , 220 USPQ 577, 583 (Fed.Cir.1984) [cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985)] (public use).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William C. Page
See United States v. James, 728 F.2d 465, 467-68 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 106 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984); United States v. Primrose, 718 F.2d 1484, 1493 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Uhler v. State
See Smith v. Maryland, 442 U. S. 735 (99 SC 2577, 61 LE2d 220), and Evans v. State, 252 Ga. 312 (1), 316-318 ( 314 SE2d 421 ), cert, denied at 469 U. S. 826 (105 SC 106, 83 LE2d 50).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Okwara v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
See, e.g., Arnold v. Burger King Corp., 719 F.2d 63 (4th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984) (discussing the reasons courts have found a claim frivolous); Hutchison v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076 (4th Cir. 1993) (finding the district court properly granted attorney’s fees against a plaintiff who brought a § 1983 claim which *594 was “conjecture” and “speculation” and “had no basis in fact”); DeBauche v. Trani, 191 F.3d. 499 (4th Cir. 1999) (finding that the trial court acted within its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees on the basis that plaintiffs clai…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kentucky State District Council of Carpenters, Afl-Cio v. Wehr Constructors, Inc.
Id.; see also Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 158 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City Of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.
Compare Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis.2d 166 , 342 N.W.2d 37, 52-53 (risk approach), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984) with Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co., 73 N.Y.2d 487 , 541 N.Y.S.2d 941 , 539 N.E.2d 1069, 1077-78 (market share approach), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 350 , 107 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'n
Compare Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis.2d 166 , 342 N.W.2d 37, 52-53 (risk approach), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984) with Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co., 73 N.Y.2d 487 , 541 N.Y.S.2d 941 , 539 N.E.2d 1069, 1077-78 (market share approach), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 350 , 107 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William E. O'Brien v. The United States
See, e.g., Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 726 F.2d 718, 721 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. News-Press & Gazette Co.
See also Windsor v. The Tennessean, 3 719 F.2d 155, 161 (6th Cir.1983) (interpreting § 1985(1) broadly), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 105 , 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carmania Corp., N v. v. Hambrecht Terrell International
See, e.g., Vareka Investments, N.V. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., 724 F.2d 907 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984); Jerguson v. Blue Dot Investment, Inc., 659 F.2d 31 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 946 , 102 S.Ct. 2013 , 72 L.Ed.2d 469 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
North Star Hotels Corp. v. Mid-City Hotel Associates
See, e.g., Vareka Investments N.V. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., 724 F.2d 907 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ASSOCIATED PETRO. PROD. v. Treco 3 Rivers Energy
See, e.g., Vareka Investments, N.V. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., 724 F.2d 907 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 107 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Environmental Instruments, Inc. v. Sutron Co.
See, e.g., TP Laboratories, Inc. v. Professional Positioners, 724 F.2d 965 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 (1984); In re Yarn Processing Validity Litigation, 498 F.2d 271, 278 (5th Cir.) (“patent is valid if the public use or sale was primarily for the purpose of experimentation”), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Marsh
See also Arnold v. Burger King Corp., 719 F.2d 63 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith International, Inc. v. Kennametal, Inc.
See also TP Laboratories v. Professional Positioners, Inc., 724 F.2d 965 , 968 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 108 , 83 L.Ed.2d 51 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Windsor
v.
The Tennessean
v.
The Tennessean
No. 83-1920.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.