green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.5 score
“we decline to follow durrett's 70 fair market value rule for the reason that a regularly conducted sale, open to all bidders and all creditors, is itself a safeguard against the evils of private transfers to relatives and favorites”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
H. Floyd McGahee v. Northern Propane Gas Company
But see Adjusters Replace-A-Car, Inc. v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc., 735 F.2d 884, 890 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1160 , 105 S.Ct. 910 , 83 L.Ed.2d 924 (1985) (attempting to harmonize International Air and Malcolm with Bayou Bottling, Inc. v. Dr. Pepper Co., 725 F.2d 300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 123 , 83 L.Ed.2d 651 (1984)). 22 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
John McNeill, Jr, R.Ph. And Nichols Southside Pharmacy v. Courtney N. Phillips, Executive Commissioner Sylvia Hernandez Kauffman, Inspector General And Texas Health and Human Services Commission
he ultimate test of due process of law in an administrative hearing is the presence or absence of rudiments of fair play.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)
madrid ii
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barrett v. Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
we decline to follow durrett's 70 fair market value rule for the reason that a regularly conducted sale, open to all bidders and all creditors, is itself a safeguard against the evils of private transfers to relatives and favorites
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bolton v. Jones
Abel v Eli Lilly & Co, 418 Mich 311, 323-324 ; 343 NW2d 164 (1984), cert den sub nom ER Squibb & Sons v Abel, — US —; 105 S Ct 123 : 83 L Ed 2d 65 *648 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Annie Green and James Green v. Ronald L. Cook, D.D.S.
See State v. Crank , 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 833 (1984); McMahan v. Greenwood, 108 S.W.3d 467 , 498 – 99 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Blake v. Lewis , 886 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no writ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Annie Green and James Green v. Ronald L. Cook, D.D.S.
See State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 (1984); McMahan v. Greenwood, 108 S.W.3d 467 , 498–99 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Blake v. Lewis, 886 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no writ).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Monroe
See State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Guerrero-Ramirez v. Texas State Bd. of Med.
discussed
Cited "see"
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation
(2×)
See generally In re Madrid, 725 F. 2d 1197 (CA9), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 833 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Gantz v. Colonial Central Savings Bank, F.S.B. (In Re Gantz)
See In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424, 426 (9th Cir. BAP 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
The Estate Construction Company v. Miller & Smith Holding Company, Incorporated
See In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Durrett v. Washington Nat'l Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Estate Construction Co. v. Miller & Smith Holding Co.
See In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Durrett v. Washington Nat’l Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles v. Zamora
Tex. R.Civ.P. 166a(f); See State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Hernandez v. Heldenfels, 374 S.W.2d 196, 202 (Tex.1963); Schero v. Astra Bar, Inc., 596 S.W.2d 613, 615 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1980, no writ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sewell Plastics, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
(2×)
Accord Bayou Bottling, Inc. v. Dr. Pepper Co., 725 F.2d 300, 305 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 123 , 83 L.Ed.2d 65 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter N. Yoder & Sons, Inc. v. Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union No. 100
See Local 59, IBEW v. Green Corp., 725 F.2d 264, 266-67 (5th Cir.) (district court remanded to arbitration panel for clarification), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
C. Roger Youmans, Jr., M.D., and Leonard B. Tatar, Trustee, Plaintiffs v. Nick Simon and Bidco, Inc.
See Bayou Bottling, Inc. v. Dr. Pepper Co., 725 F.2d 300, 303 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 123 , 83 L.Ed.2d 65 (1984). 1 The determination of what is a “security” must begin with a review of the statutory language of the federal securities laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Olympia Company, Inc. And Olympia Roofing Company, Inc. v. The Celotex Corporation
See Bayou Bottling, Inc. v. Dr. Pepper Co., 725 F.2d 300, 304-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 123 , 83 L.Ed.2d 65 (1984) (monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy in restraint of trade); Chrysler Credit Corp., 670 F.2d at 579 (price discrimination); Cash v. Arctic Circle, Inc., 85 F.R.D. 618, 622 (E.D.Wash.1979) (tying).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eugene E. McMeekin v. Heather Marie McMeekin
See also State v. Crank , 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 833 (1984) (Where a party’s counsel has voluntarily withdrawn from the case, or a party by an emergency is left without legal representation, the courts have held such circumstances justified a continuance).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rene R. Hovious v. Jeffrey Charles Hovious
See Villegas v. Carter , 711 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986); see also State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.) (holding state board of dental examiners did not abuse its discretion by denying continuance when party did not discharge his attorney until morning of hearing), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 833 (1984); Zetune v. Jafif-Zetune , 774 S.W.2d 387, 391 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1989, writ denied) (holding husband not entitled to continuance when he represented to the court that his attorneys were withdrawing on day of trial at his request), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 813 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rene R. Hovious v. Jeffrey Charles Hovious
See Villegas v. Carter , 711 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986); see also State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.) (holding state board of dental examiners did not abuse its discretion by denying continuance when party did not discharge his attorney until morning of hearing), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 833 (1984); Zetune v. Jafif-Zetune , 774 S.W.2d 387, 391 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1989, writ denied) (holding husband not entitled to continuance when he represented to the court that his attorneys were withdrawing on day of trial at his request), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 813 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Silver Bros. Co., Inc.
See also In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424 (BAP 9th Cir.1982), aff'd 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); In re Rancourt, 153 B.R. 380 (Bankr.D.N.H.1993); In re Stadium Management Corp., 895 F.2d 845 , 847 (1st Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conley v. Boyle Drug Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co., 418 Mich. 311 , 343 N.W.2d 164 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 123 , 83 L.Ed.2d 65 (1984) (some plaintiffs in this action were able to specifically name the manufacturer of the product causing their injury); Lyons v. Premo Pharmaceutical Labs, Inc., 170 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Helen Grenier Lyon, Etc. v. The Ranger III and Gerald J. Costa, Helen Grenier Lyon, Etc. v. The Ranger III and Gerald J. Costa
(2×)
In such a case, each defendant is liable not only for his own acts but also for the acts of others with whom he acts in concert, see 3 Harper, James & Gray § 10.1 (“concert of action" makes it “proper to treat the conduct of each as the conduct of the others as well”); Restatement (2d) § 876 & comment a (same); Prosser & Keeton § 46 (same); Speiser, Krause & Gans § 3:4 (similar); see, e.g., Thompson v. Johnson, 180 F.2d 431 (5th Cir.1950) (where group aided assault and battery, all liable under “concerted action” or non-pecuniary “common enterprise” theories); Hall, 345 F.Sup…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beck v. General Accident Insurance (In Re Hughes & Associates Insurance Agency, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Madrid, 725 F.2d 1197, 1204 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984) (Farris, J., concurring); In re Bundles, 61 B.R. 929, 934 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Ind.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wheless Drilling, New Park Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Bennett
See, e.g., Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. (In re Madrid), 725 F.2d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1981) (Clark, J., dissenting); Alden, Gross & Borowitz, Real Property Foreclosure as a Fraudulent Conveyance: Proposals For Solving the Problem, 38 Bus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Emerald Oil Co.
See, e.g., Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. (In re Madrid), 725 F.2d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1981) (Clark, J., dissenting); Alden, Gross & Borowitz, Real Property Foreclosure as a Fraudulent Conveyance: Proposals For Solving the Problem, 38 Bus.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cook
v.
R. W. Harmon & Sons, Inc.
v.
R. W. Harmon & Sons, Inc.
No. 83-2087.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.