green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
13.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“At a minimum, a 1983 plaintiff must show that a supervisory official at least implicitly authorized, approved or knowingly acquiesced in the unconstitutional conduct.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“At a minimum, a 1983 plaintiff must show that a supervisory official at least implicitly authorized, approved, or knowingly acquiesced in the unconstitutional conduct.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Vasquez
prison inmates have no absolute constitutional right to visitation
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Prisoners' Legal Ass'n v. Roberson
he testimony ... fails to establish that appellees intentionally or negligently deprived bellamy of his meals to the degree that a jury could find an eighth amendment violation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eckford-El v. Toombs
at a minimum, a 1983 plaintiff must show that a supervisory official at least implicitly authorized, approved, or knowingly acquiesced in the unconstitutional conduct.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weaver v. Toombs
at a minimum, a 1983 plaintiff must show that a supervisory official at least implicitly authorized, approved or knowingly acquiesced in the unconstitutional conduct.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities Litigation
proof of an agreement the objective of which is a substantive violation of rico (such as conducting the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering) is sufficient to establish a violation of section 1962(d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rr v. Nj Dept. of Corrections
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F. 2d 416, 420 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 93 (1984); see also, Turner v. Safley, ... 482 U.S. 78, 89 , 107 S.Ct. 2254 , 96 L.Ed. 2d 64 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tungate v. Thoms
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984); Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325-26 , 102 S.Ct. 445 , 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
BAZZETTA v. McGINNIS
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 420 (6th Cir.) ("Prison inmates have no absolute constitutional right to visitation."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984); O'Bryan, supra, 741 F.2d at 285 ; Percy v. Jabe, 823 F.Supp. 445, 448 (E.D.Mich.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bazzetta v. McGinnis
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 420 (6th Cir.) (“Prison inmates have no absolute constitutional right to visitation.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984); O’Bryan, supra, 741 F.2d at 285 ; Percy v. Jabe, 823 F.Supp. 445, 448 (E.D.Mich.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen Randy McClain v. Lake County, Ohio Daniel A. Dunlap, Sheriff Frank Leonbruno, Administrator Burney Puzar, Chaplain
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Cedric Lamont Lacey v. Michigan Department of Corrections Kenneth L. McGinnis Denise Cole Sherri Andrews
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Lee Banks
See United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 622 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984). 21 Banks complains of two pieces of arguably objectionable testimony.
cited
Cited "see"
Bremiller v. Cleveland Psychiatric Institute
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Flowers v. Traughber
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 419 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984). 5 Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and affirm the district court's judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard M. Kennard v. Jerry Wray, Director, Ohio Department of Transportation, Individually and in His Official Capacity
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.) (holding that "[t]here must be a showing that the supervisor encouraged the specific incident of misconduct or in some other way directly participated in it."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984). 13 Kennard concedes that Wray delegated the signature authority, but argues that this delegation of authority was illegal under state law and therefore void.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Javier Vasquez-Velasco
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1083-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); Brown v. United States, 299 F.2d 438 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 946 , 82 S.Ct. 1593 , 8 L.Ed.2d 812 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sam Johnson v. Henry Grayson
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984). 7 Finally, all the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity because reasonable officials in their position could disagree as to whether application of the prison regulations at issue violated Johnson's rights.
cited
Cited "see"
Darrell Syncate-El v. Raymond G. Toombs, Warden Deputy Fitzner
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 420 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick
(2×)
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick
(2×)
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Herring, Jr. v. County of Cuyahoga Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department Warden Stafford, Cleveland County Prison
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 419 (6th Cir.) (the deprivation of the basic necessities of life by prison officials constitutes an Eighth Amendment violation), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984); Parrish v. Johnson, 800 F.2d 600, 609 (6th Cir.1986) (the Eighth Amendment protects prisoners from the denial of the basic elements of hygiene); Brooks v. Seiter, 779 F.2d 1177, 1180 (6th Cir.1985) (prisoners retain a limited right to receive reading and writing material); Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920, 927-28 (6th Cir.1985) (prisoners are entitled to regular exercise and a constitutional mini…
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 90-16623, 90-16624
See United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 619 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 848, 105 S.Ct. 156 , 164, 83 L.Ed.2d 93, 100 (1984); United States v. Thomas, 887 F.2d 1341, 1347 (9th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
River City Markets, Inc. v. Fleming Foods West, Inc.
See United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 619 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 848, 105 S.Ct. 156 , 164, 83 L.Ed.2d 93, 100 (1984); United States v. Thomas, 887 F.2d 1341, 1347 (9th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neal v. Miller
The Eighth Amendment also requires the states to provide prisoners with the “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes, 452 U.S. at 347 , 101 S.Ct. at 2399 ; accord, Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 420 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Ivan Esacove
See United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 620 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
In the context of a criminal case, where a magistrate has found that an affidavit presented to him showed that there was probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, a challenge to the veracity of the affidavit merits a hearing only if the challenger makes a “substantial preliminary showing” that the affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, made a false statement in his affidavit and if the allegedly false statement was “necessary to the finding of probable cause.” Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (19…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
In the context of a criminal case, where a magistrate has found that an affidavit presented to him showed that there was probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, a challenge to the veracity of the affidavit merits a hearing only if the challenger makes a "substantial preliminary showing" that the affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, made a false statement in his affidavit and if the allegedly false statement was "necessary to the finding of probable cause." Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); see…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Manuel Perez
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.) (one who launders the proceeds received following distribution of drugs may be held as an aider and abettor of substantive drug violations), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); accord United States v. Lignarolo, 770 F.2d 971 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1948 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Pungitore, Jr., in No. 89-1371. United States of America v. Joseph Grande. In No. 89-1372. United States of America v. Francis Iannarella, Jr., in No. 89-1393. United States of America v. Phillip Narducci. In No. 89-1395. United States of America v. Salvatore Scafidi. In No. 89-1396. United States of America v. Nicholas Virgilio. In No. 89-1397. United States of America v. Charles Iannece. In No. 89-1400. United States of America v. Salvatore Wayne Grande. In No. 89-1401. United States of America v. Joseph Pungitore. In No. 89-1402. United States of America v. Frank Narducci, Jr., in No. 89-1403. United States of America v. Ralph Staino, Jr., in No. 89-1404. United States of America v. Salvatore J. Merlino. In No. 89-1409. United States of America v. Nicodemo Scarfo. In No. 89-1446. United States of America v. Joseph Ciancaglini. In No. 89-1448
Accord United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 622 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984) (jury reasonably could infer that defendant turned fugitive because of co-conspirator's cooperation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pungitore
Accord United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 622 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984) (jury reasonably could infer that defendant turned fugitive because of co-conspirator’s cooperation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackie H. Campbell, Jr. v. Luther Townley, Clinic/hospital Administrator of Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984). 7 Finally, we conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the district court did not commit reversible error in granting summary judgment before giving plaintiff ten days notice thereof under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(c).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul R. Manning v. L. v. Stewart
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 419-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael R. Weatherford v. Robert Brown Gerald R. Hofbauer Matthew Hensley
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 419-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
James Lavern Howard v. Philip J. Heffron, Sheriff of Kent County Correctional Facility
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fletcher v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984). 5 Further, we conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed as against defendant Wagerman, plaintiff's court appointed attorney.
cited
Cited "see"
Lamarr Fletcher v. Clint Crabtree John 1 and 2 Does
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shabazz v. Blanchard
See Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984); Dunn v. Tennessee, 697 F.2d 121, 128 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1086 (1983). 4 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. David Silverman
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. 7'ille, 729 F.2d 615, 622 (9th Cir.) (upholding flight instruction where local newspaper had reported progress of police investigation and defendant had been carrying name and address of criminal defense attorney when arrested), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 156 , 83 L.Ed.2d 93 & 848, 105 S.Ct. 164 , 83 L.Ed.2d 100 (1984); United States v. Hernandez-Miranda, 601 F.2d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.1979) (upholding flight instruction where defendant had been arraigned and had pIed guilty prior to fleeing and, therefore, knew about the charges against him).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Biaggi
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Michael Newman v. United States
See 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b). 2 The use of a special verdict identifying which underlying offenses were the objects of the conspiracy would have eliminated this ambiguity. 3 In United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984), the Second Circuit was confronted with precisely this issue and invalidated the sentence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. All Funds & Other Property Contained in Account Number 031-217362
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1078-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1086 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984); United States v. Alessi, 638 F.2d 466, 472 (2d Cir.1980); see generally United States v. Macchia, 35 F.3d at 672-73 (Newman, then C.J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luke Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1086 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984); United States v. Alessi, 638 F.2d *73 466, 472 (2d Cir.1980); see generally United States v. Macchia, 35 F.3d at 672-73 (Newman, then-C.J., concurring).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hsia
See, e.g., United States v. Gometz, 730 F.2d 475 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984) (finding that 70% non-response rate did not violate Jury Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Olga Moreno, Hector Becerra, Oscar Fabio Moreno, Hernan Moreno
Id.; see also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1083 (2d Cir.) (“[I]n the absence of a *215 special verdict, there was no way ... to know whether the jury intended to convict [the defendant] for a cocaine-related conspiracy, for a marijuana-related conspiracy, or for a conspiracy involving both drugs.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
Caraballo-Sandoval v. Honsted, 35 F.3d 521 (11th Cir. 1994); Evans v. Johnson, 808 F.2d 1427 (11th Cir. 1987); see also Bellamy v. Bradley, 729 F.2d 416 , (6th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 845 (1984); Bazzetta v. McGinnis, 124 F.3d 774 (6th Cir. 1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence Neumann v. Thomas Page, Warden, Menard Correctional Institute
See also United States v. Gometz, 730 F.2d 475 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Matheson
Compare State v. Ogle, 627 S.W.2d 73, 76 (Mo.App.1981), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 91 (1984)(meaning given by statute to term “serious physical injury5’ was not the same as lay meaning of term and thus it needed to be defined for jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rioux
See also United States v. Gometz, 730 F.2d 475, 479-80 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984) (quoting S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alfonso Valencia
See Whitman, 771 F.2d at 1352 ; Kenny, 645 F.2d at 1340 ; see also United States v. Tille, 729 F.2d 615, 620 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , and cert. denied, 469 U.S. 848 (1984). 16 Valencia requested a limiting instruction when the tape recorded conversations were admitted into evidence, which the district court erroneously refused.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farris
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6879.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.