Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n, 469 U.S. 925 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n, 469 U.S. 925 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
77 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Levy (njb, 2000-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Levy (2×)
Bankr. D.N.J. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Koreh, 59 F.3d 431, 445-46 (3d Cir.1995) (citing EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 80 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984)).
discussed Cited "see" Burtch v. Security Pacific Bank Oregon (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.) (2×)
E.D. Pa. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.E.O.C. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 80 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984). 10 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ferenc Koreh (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See *446 EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 80 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Koreh
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 U.S. 69 , 80 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Novus Franchising, Inc. v. Taylor (2×)
M.D. Penn. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Diane C. Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, and Pension Trust Funds, Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., and Patricia J. Golosky, Patricia J. Golosky, Diane C. Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, and Pension Trust Funds, Charles J. Schaeffer, Jr., and Patricia J. Golosky, Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity and Charles J. Schaeffer, Jr. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 81 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984). 45 Although ERISA itself does not explicitly provide a statutory right of restitution, it is clear that Congress intended federal courts to fashion a federal common-law under ERISA, and this permits application of a federal common-law doctrine of unjust enrichment if restitution would not override a contractual provision of an ERISA plan.
discussed Cited "see" Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust Funds (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 81 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Aetna Life & Casualty Corporation v. David G. Maravich (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.E.O.C. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 81 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Aetna Life & Casualty Corp. v. Maravich (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.E.O.C. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 81 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Panas v. Polonia Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Panas) (2×)
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 80-81, 84-85 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984); and Thomas P. Carney, Inc. v. School District of Philadelphia, 633 F.Supp. 1273, 1283-84 (E.D.Pa.1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lemmon v. Santa Cruz County, Cal. (2×)
N.D. Cal. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also E.E.O.C. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 81 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
examined Cited "see, e.g." The Cleveland Newspaper Guild, Local 1 v. The Plain Dealer Publishing Co. (4×)
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
"The fact that there have been personnel changes or that employees have retired is irrelevant unless those employees are unavailable." Bernard, 596 F.2d at 1257 ; see also EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69, 84 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925 , 105 S.Ct. 307 , 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.
v.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
No. 84-275.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1984.
469 U.S. 925
Cited by 34 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.