green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Watson v. Shandell (In Re Watson)
See In re Howell, 731 F.2d 624 , 627 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 330 , 83 L.Ed.2d 266 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pagano v. Frank
See Mesnick, 950 F.2d at 825 n.6 (explaining that, although the burden-shifting framework becomes inconsequential at this point, the district court, faced with a Rule 56 motion, "must still examine the evidence that the parties adduced in proceeding under the framework"). 9 Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pagano v. Frank
See Mesnick, 950 F.2d at 825 n.6 ___ _______ (explaining that, although the burden-shifting framework becomes inconsequential at this point, the district court, faced with a Rule 56 motion, "must still examine the evidence that the parties adduced in proceeding under the framework"). 9 Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Javier Valencia and Ivan Dario Martinez-Valencia
See United States v. Brown, 739 F.2d 1136, 1143 (7th Cir.) (rejecting defendant’s misplaced reliance on Barclay and stating that a failure to give a separate instruction on specific intent is not reversible error so long as the court’s other instructions sufficiently define the required mental state), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984); United States v. Arambasich, 597 F.2d 609, 611-14 (7th Cir.1979) (similarly rejecting defendant’s misplaced reliance on Barclay and criticizing the use of stock "specific intent” and "general intent’’ instructions as …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted H. Kimball
See In re Howell, 731 F.2d 624 , 627 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 330 , 83 L.Ed.2d 266 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a Corporation, Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a Corporation
See In re Howell, 731 F.2d 624 , 627 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 330 , 83 L.Ed.2d 266 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Mears Park Holding Corp. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.
See Cybyske v. Independent School District No. 196, 347 N.W.2d 256 (Minn.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 330 , 83 L.Ed.2d 266 (1984). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
The United States of America v. Moises Otero
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 739 F.2d 1136, 1146 (7th Cir.) cert. denied sub nom., 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Valdez v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
See White v. Vathally, 732 F.2d 1037, 1043 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 [ 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 267 ] (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. Chipollini
(3×)
See White v. Vathally, 732 F.2d 1037, 1043 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 267 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barbara Gibb v. Jack Kemp, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
See, e.g., White v. Vathally, 732 F.2d 1037, 1042-43 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cuello Suarez v. PUERTO RICO ELEC. POWER AUTHORITY
See, e.g., Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 , 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1093 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 ; see also White v. Vathally, 732 F.2d 1037 (1st Cir.), cert. den. 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 267 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilson Bigman
“But this rule is not inflexible.” Quinn v. Robinson, 783 F.2d 776, 814 (9th Cir.1986) (citing Youakim v. Miller, 425 U.S. 231, 234 , 96 S.Ct. 1399, 1401 , 47 L.Ed.2d 701 (1976)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 271 , 93 L.Ed.2d 247 (1986); see also In re Howell, 731 F.2d 624 , 627 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 330 , 83 L.Ed.2d 266 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chicago Ridge Theatre Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership, and F & F Management Co., a Corporation v. M & R Amusement Corp.
See, e.g., White v. Vathally, 732 F.2d 1037, 1042 (1st Cir.) (harmless error where unintroduced evidence was “entirely cumulative”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 267 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Wayde Mealy and Lance B. Spotts
See Walsh v. Mellas, 837 F.2d 789, 799-800 (7th Cir.1988) (failure to press an argument either before the district court or on appeal results in waiver); see also United States v. Brown, 739 F.2d 1136, 1144-45 (7th Cir.) (appellate court may refuse to consider an ineffective assistance of counsel claim if the claim was not first raised before the *910 district court and the record on appeal is not sufficient for the court to rule on the merits of the claim), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
Youngs
v.
Broome County Department of Social Services
v.
Broome County Department of Social Services
No. 84-344.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.