green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“he mere presence of hearsay or inaccurate information in a presentence report does not constitute a denial of due process”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Timothy Paul Strayer
But see United States v. Tooker, 747 F.2d 975 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985) (defendant challenging sentence must show that information in presentence report was materially inaccurate and that judge relied on information) (Rule 35 motion); United States v. Darby, 744 F.2d 1508 (11th Cir.1984) (whether information in the presentence report was inaccurate was not clear since the defendant offered no additional evidence to refute the factual assertions).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Parker
he mere presence of hearsay or inaccurate information in a presentence report does not constitute a denial of due process
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Foreman
See United States v. Andrews, 746 F.2d 247 , 249 n.3 (5th Cir. 1984) (“a mere failure to state a purpose does not render the defendant’s consent involuntary”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S. Ct. 2032 , 85 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wisconsin ex rel. Robinson v. Buchler
See United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1232 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985); United States v. Banks, 687 F.2d 967, 973 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1212 , 103 S.Ct. 1208 , 75 L.Ed.2d 448 (1983); United States v. Ziperstein, 601 F.2d 281, 285 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); United States v. George, 477 F.2d 508, 515 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 827 , 94 S.Ct. 155 , 38 L.Ed.2d 61 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1231 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1231 (7th Cir.) ("it was likely that they would conceal the cash in the apartment rather than in some less secure and accessible place"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985); Lucarz, 430 F.2d at 1055 (noting that affidavit "showed that appellant had ample opportunity to make a trip home to hide the stolen envelopes").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1231 (7th Cir.) ("it was likely that they would conceal the cash in the apartment rather than in some less secure and accessible place"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 (1985); Lucarz, 430 F.2d at 1055 (noting that affidavit "showed that appellant had ample opportunity to make a trip home to hide the stolen envelopes").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cesar Duran
See United States v. Colonia, 870 F.2d 1319, 1324-25 (7th Cir.1989); accord United States v. Calvente, 722 F.2d 1019, 1023 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2030 , 85 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven L. Kaplan, M.D.
See United States v. Calvente, 722 F.2d 1019, 1023 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2030 , 85 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985) (no coercion where an officer said he could obtain a warrant if consent were refused but there was ample evidence to support probable cause); United States v. Faruolo, 506 F.2d 490 (2d Cir.1974) (upholding a consent search where the defendant was given his Miranda rights, told that he had the right to refuse, and probable cause existed as to the search).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cole
See United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1232 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985); Kendall, 665 F.2d at 138 ; United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Grabiec, 563 F.2d 313, 318-19 (7th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Bosworth v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Calvente, 722 F.2d 1019, 1023 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivan Buljubasic and Slobodan Pavlovic
See United States v. Hendrix, 752 F.2d 1226, 1232 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985); United States v. Banks, 687 F.2d 967, 973 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1212 , 103 S.Ct. 1208 , 75 L.Ed.2d 448 (1983); United States v. Ziperstein, 601 F.2d 281, 285 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); United States v. George, 477 F.2d 508, 515 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 827 , 94 S.Ct. 155 , 38 L.Ed.2d 61 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(HC) Wilburn v. Rowe
Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 22 U.S. 103 , 125 n.26 (1975); see also Howard v. Cupp, 747 F.2d 510, 510 (9th Cir. 1984) (well 23 settled that there is no fundamental right to a preliminary hearing), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 24 (1985). 25 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Avincola v. Stinson
See, e.g., United States v. Calvente, 722 F.2d 1019, 1024 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2030 , 85 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); United States v. Humphrey, 696 F.2d 72, 75 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1222 , 103 S.Ct. 1230 , 75 L.Ed.2d 463 (1983); Dunbar v. Harris, 612 F.2d at 693-94 ; United States v. Cardillo, 316 F.2d at 611 ; Mercado v. Stinson, 1999 WL 129570 *9 ; Carmona v. State of New York, 1997 WL 876737 at *12.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
United States v. Carter, 884 F. 2d 368, 375 (8th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Andrews, 746 F. 2d 247, 250 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 314 (1985), overruled on other grounds, United States v. Hurtado, 905 F. 2d 74 (5th Cir.1990) (en banc); United States v. Briley, 726 F. 2d 1301, 1304 (8th Cir.1984); Alexander v. United States, 390 F. 2d 101, 110 (5th Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abcasis
See e.g., United States v. Calvente, 722 F.2d 1019, 1023 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2030 , 85 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cruz
See, e.g., United States v. Calvente, 722 F.2d 1019, 1023 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2030 , 85 L.Ed.2d 313 and 474 U.S. 859 , 106 S.Ct. 170 , 88 L.Ed.2d 141 (1985) (“Agent Maraño told Martinez-Torres that he could obtain a warrant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl P. Fogel
To prove a due process violation, however, the defendant must show that the challenged information “is (1) false or unreliable, and (2) demonstrably made the basis for the sentence.” United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Tooker, 747 F.2d 975, 978-80 (5th Cir.1984), cert, denied, 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985) (defendant has burden of showing that information is inaccurate and that court explicitly relied upon it); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maldonado Garcia
See, e.g., U.S. v. Andrews, 746 F.2d 247 (5th Cir. 1984) cert. denied, Andrews v. U.S., 471 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 2032 , 85 L.Ed.2d 314 (1985).
Gibbs
v.
Phelps, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections
v.
Phelps, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections
No. 84-6295.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.