green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Ass'n v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc.
See Air Prods. & Chems., Inc., v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1563 (Fed.Cir.) (existence of a state law defense, even if pleaded in the complaint for declaratory judgment, does not defeat subject-matter jurisdiction), petition for cert, dismissed by agreement of the parties, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Association v. Sdc Basketball Club, Inc.
See Air Prods. & Chems., Inc., v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1563 (Fed.Cir.) (existence of a state law defense, even if pleaded in the complaint for declaratory judgment, does not defeat subject-matter jurisdiction), petition for cert. dismissed by agreement of the parties, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc.
“The district court’s ‘arising under’ jurisdiction in patent cases is properly measured at the complaint stage of the proceedings.” Xeta, Inc. v. Atex, Inc., 825 F.2d 604, 606 (1st Cir.1987); see also Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1562 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc., James Abbenhaus and Rodger D. Noel, Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc., James Abbenhaus and Rodger D. Noel
"The district court's 'arising under' jurisdiction in patent cases is properly measured at the complaint stage of the proceedings." Xeta, Inc. v. Atex, Inc., 825 F.2d 604, 606 (1st Cir.1987); see also Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1562 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985). 14 The three consolidated cases which resulted in the consent judgment were grounded on the district court's patent jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John H. Hartley, Jr., M.D. v. Mentor Corporation, Defendant/third-Party v. American Hospital Supply Corporation, Third-Party
Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394 , 397 n. 2, 101 S.Ct. 2424 , 2427 n. 2, 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); see also Air Prods. & Chems., Inc. v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1561 , 225 USPQ 121, 122 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burger
v.
Kemp, Warden
v.
Kemp, Warden
No. A-182 (84-6953).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 6, 1985.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death scheduled for Monday, September 9, 1985, presented to Justice Powell, and by him referred to the Court, is granted pending the disposition by this Court of the petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay terminates automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, this stay shall continue pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.