green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Wingrove v. Forshey
See United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 733 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985) (collecting cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
Feaster v. Beshears
See Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179, 182 (4th Cir.1985) n. 2, cert.denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985); Sweezy v. Garrison, 694 F.2d 331, 331 (4th Cir.1982), cert.denied, 461 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 1882 , 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983); cf. Harding v. State of North Carolina, 683 F.2d 850 (4th Cir.1982)(conditional waivers of exhaustion requirement are not permissible).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred Louis Lamp v. State of IA
See Lamp v. Farrier, 763 F.2d 994, 996 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 (1985). -2- While housed in the Polk County Jail, Lamp occupied a cell adjacent to the cell of Keith Trotter, who was imprisoned on theft charges.
cited
Cited "see"
Fred Louis Lamp v. State of Iowa Director, Division of Adult Corrections County Attorney in and for Polk County
See Lamp v. Farrier, 763 F.2d 994, 996 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 534 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter A. Makres, Also Known as Jerome K. Callahan
Nonetheless, we must acknowledge the “extremely limited” standard of review that applies in such cases, because “[t]he decision to grant or deny a timely filed Rule 35 motion is a matter of pure discre *1287 tion.” United States v. Rovetuso, 840 F.2d 363, 365 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 903 , 108 S.Ct. 245 , 98 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987); accord Gaertner v. United States, 763 F.2d 787, 795 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985). 8 As amended by his appointed counsel, Mr. Makres’ Motion for Sentence Reduction was nothing more than a plea for len…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Byars
See United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985) (collecting cases); see also United States v. Salter, 815 F.2d 1150 (7th Cir.1987) (police action in inducing defendant to open door by means of a ruse did not constitute intrusion within meaning of the statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Galimanis
(2×)
See United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Horace Franklin Dunkins, Jr. v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Corrections, and W.E. Johnson, Warden, Holman Unit
See Lamp v. Farrier, 763 F.2d 994, 997-98 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 534 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam Rovetuso
See Gaertner v. United States, 763 F.2d 787, 795 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sconsa
See, e.g., United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-33 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 (1985) (collecting cases that hold that police entry through an open door is not a “breaking” within the meaning of the federal knock and announce statute); State v. Dixon, 924 P.2d 181, 186 (Haw. 1996) (noting that federal courts have held, “virtually universally,” that federal knock and announce rule is not implicated when police use deception, without force, to cause occupant to open the door, and thereby effect police entry into a house because such entry is not a “breaking” under…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoffman v. Tuten
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.1985)(party precluded from raising on appeal factual issue to which it did not object in the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anderson
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.)(party precluded from raising on appeal factual issue to which it did not object in the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Ashcroft
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.)(party precluded from raising on appeal factual issue to which it did not object in the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eilertson v. United States
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 ,180 n.1 (4th Cir.)(party precluded from raising on appeal factual issue to which it did not object in the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooper v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, Inc.
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.) (party precluded from raising on appeal factual issue to which it did not object in the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
House v. Aiken County National Bank
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.) (party precluded from raising on appeal factual issue to which it did not object in the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 [ 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 ] (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cole v. United States
See also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730 , 732 n. 2 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Osorno
See, e.g., United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-733 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sullivan
United States v. Savaiano, 843 F.2d at 1296 ; see also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 733 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sullivan
United States v. Savaiano, 843 F.2d at 1296 ; see also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 733 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. McReavy
(2×)
See also United States v Remigio, 767 F2d 730, 734 (CA 10, 1985), cert den 474 US 1009 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hurst
See also United States v. Klein, 20 MJ 26 , 28 n.2 (CMA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 534 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snyder v. Ridenour
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949 (6th Cir.1981); McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1700 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc) (Unit B), and Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603 (1st Cir.1980). 14 Ridenour concedes that under the Supreme Court's decision in Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985), a part…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snyder v. Ridenour
See also Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179 , 180 n. 1 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 466 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949 (6th Cir.1981); McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 996 , 101 S.Ct. 1700 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc) (Unit B), and Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603 (1st Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Burl Allen Peveto, Jr., United States of America v. Melvin Ray Rodgers, United States of America v. Carl Eugene Hines, A/K/A Geno Hines
See also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-733 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peveto
See also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-733 (10th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frett v. State
See, e.g., Praylow v. Martin, 761 F. (2d) 179 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1009 , 106 S. Ct. 535 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill Crummey
(2×)
See also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985); United States v. Calabrese, 755 F.2d 302 (2nd Cir.1985), in which dual convictions on both conspiracy and attempt were upheld although the courts did not address the issue of multiplicity.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barlow
v.
Brewery Workers Local Union No. 1010
v.
Brewery Workers Local Union No. 1010
No. 85-726.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1985.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.