green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross Common Carrier, Inc. v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation
See Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150 (1983), aff'd, Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 757 F.2d 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross Common Carrier, Inc. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
See Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150 (1983), aff'd, Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n, Inc. v. United States, 757 F.2d 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zipperer v. City of Fort Myers
See New Iberia, 921 F.2d at 614 (stating that the parties' emphasis on precise measurement of the costs and benefits of the municipal improvements misplaces the focus of a constitutional analysis) 6 Application of the Mennonite decision has also been narrowed by the Eleventh Circuit in FDIC v. Morrison, 747 F.2d 610 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans-Allied Audit Company, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, United States of America, Twin Modal, Inc., Intervenor
Carriers can provide common carriage or contract carriage or both. 49 U.S.C. §§ 10921-10923 ; see Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 244 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 757 F.2d 301 (describing regulatory history of motor common and contract carriage), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Household Goods Forwarders Tariff Bureau v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
See generally Central & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass ’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 309-12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Covey v. ConAgra, Inc.
Servs., Inc., 955 F.2d 529, 533 (8th Cir.1992) (footnote omitted); see Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150 (1983), aff'd sub nom., Central & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankruptcy Estate of United Shipping Co. v. Tucker Co.
(2×)
See Central & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 330 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Advance-United Expressways, Inc. v. Beeler Distributing Co.
See Cent. & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 330 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985); 49 U.S.C. § 10761 (b).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward J. Elkins
See United States v. Lacayo, 758 F.2d 1559, 1562-63 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985) (agreement granting leniency to witness must be reached prior to trial to be subject to disclosure).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frazier v. State
See United States v. Lacayo , 758 F.2d 1559 , 1563 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985) (wherein the court held that "[t]o warrant a new trial, the agreement of leniency [or any 'deal' made between the witness and the government] must have been reached prior to the witness's testimony," quoting United States v. Ramirez , 608 F.2d 1261 , 1266 (9th Cir. 1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Public Citizen v. Federal Trade Commission
See Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 312 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. at 511 , 95 S.Ct. at 2211 ) (noting that the requirement of injury in fact for organizational standing is satisfied if the association’s members, " ‘or any one of them, are suffering immediate or threatened injury as a result of the challenged action[’]” (emphasis added by the Central & Southern court)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'SHIELDS v. State
(2×)
See also Ex parte Callahan , 471 So.2d 463 , 464 (Ala.), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 567 , 88 L.Ed.2d 552 (1985). 'Confessions are presumed to be involuntary. . . .' Ex parte Shula , 465 So.2d 452 , 453 (Ala. 1985). 'The record must affirmatively show that [the prosecution's] burdens have been met.' Ex parte Callahan , 471 So.2d at 471 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Gene Eirven
See, e.g., United States v. Lacayo, 758 F.2d 1559, 1564-65 (11th Cir.) (not improper for prosecutor to tell jury “[wjhat you are about to hear is a true story," though he should have made clear this was only government’s theory), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985); United States v. Molina, 934 F.2d 1440, 1445 (9th Cir.1991) (prosecutor told jury, as if it were a fact, that defendant lied, but this should be interpreted only as argument that jury ought not believe defendant); United States v. Tipton, 964 F.2d 650, 655-56 (7th Cir.1992) (prosecutor told jury …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur v. State
See also Ex parte Callahan, 471 So.2d 463, 464 (Ala.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 567 , 88 L.Ed.2d 552 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
(2×)
See, e.g., Central Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 314-15 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985) (describing the Interstate Commerce Commission's broad authority to allow certain exemptions when in the "public interest" as "a congressional charge to 'go forth and do good' ").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crane
v.
Kentucky
v.
Kentucky
No. 85-5238.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Ky. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.