green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
(PC) Lal v. United States of America
Co., 758 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 9 (1985) (confusing and conclusory complaint exceeding 70 pages with attachments, was subject to 10 dismissal for want of a short and plain statement of the claim); Hollis v. York, No. 1:09-cv-0463 11 OWW SMS, 2011 WL 3740811 at *1 (E.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ponsa-Rabell v. Santander Securities, L.L.C.
Rule 59(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 8 || Procedure states that “[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended 9 || disposition, or at some other time the court sets, a party may serve and file specific written 10 || objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Upon a party’s objection, the Court 11 || shall make a de novo review. 12 In conducting its review, the Court is free to “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, 13 ||the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636 (a)(b)(1). 14 || Templeman v. Chris…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Audley
App. *905 200, 697 P.2d 1025 , review denied, 104 Wn.2d 1009 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. at 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera-Molina v. United States
See M. v. Falmouth School Department, 847 F.3d 19, 25 (1st Cir., 2017(citing Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 247 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985))(“Absent objection ... [a] district court has a right to assume that [the affected party] agree[s] to the magistrate's recommendation”); Davet v. Maccarone, 973 F.2d 22, 31 (1st Cir., 1992)(“Failure to raise objections to the Report and Recommendation waives the party's right to review in the district court and those claims not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.…
discussed
Cited "see"
A-Cal Copiers, Inc. v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 248 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985) (”[I]f depositions are either introduced in evidence or used at trial, their costs should he taxable to the losing party.”) (Emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Isles v. WHC JR.
See, e.g., Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas ___ ____ _______ _____________________ Co., 911 F.2d 426, 434-35 (10th Cir. 1990); 10 Charles ___ Wright, Arthur Miller & Mary Kane, Federal Practice and _____________________ Procedure 2676, at 341 & n.17 (1983 & '96 Supp.); see _________ ___ generally Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245 , 249 _________ _________ __________________ (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Isles v. WHC JR.
See, e.g., Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas Co., 911 F.2d 426, 434-35 (10th Cir.1990); 10 Charles Wright, Arthur Miller & Mary Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2676, at 341 & n. 17 (1983 & '96 Supp.); see generally Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 249 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gochis v. Allstate Insurance
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 249 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985) (declining to follow cases generally allowing recovery of costs of depositions “shown to have been reasonably necessary in light of the particular situation at the time it was taken”); Walters v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 692 F.Supp. 1440, 1442 (D.Mass.1988) (Garrity, J.).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Two Appeals Arising Out of the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 249 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: San Juan v.
(2×)
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp. , 770 F.2d 245, 249 (1st Cir.), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 1021 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southworth v. F
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245 , ___ _________ __________________ 250 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 (1985); Goodman v. ____________ _______ 1973 26 Foot Trojan Vessel, 859 F.2d 71, 74 (8th Cir. 1988). __________________________ Under the "saving to suitors" clause, 28 U.S.C. 1331(1), claimants in an admiralty case are not restricted to maritime relief but may also pursue remedies provided by state law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southworth MacHinery Co., Inc. v. F/v Corey Pride, All Trawl, Inc. And Robert Anderson
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 250 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985); Goodman v. 1973 26 Foot Trojan Vessel, 859 F.2d 71, 74 (8th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Southworth v. F
See Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 250 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 (1985); Goodman v. 1973 26 Foot Trojan Vessel, 859 F.2d 71, 74 (8th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. 349 South 4th Avenue, Mount Vernon, New York 10550
See El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co., 575 F.Supp. 1513, 1517 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (“It is well settled that where rights to real property are in issue, the law of the situs of the property control^].”), aff' d, 770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 573 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frederick George Roehler, II v. Robert Borg, Attorney General of the State of California
(2×)
See Roehler v. California, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985) (denying certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trailer Train Co., Railgon Co., Railbox Co. v. State Tax Commission, Director of Department of Revenue
See Trailer Train v. Bair, 765 F.2d 744, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 572 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985). 4 The issue before us is whether the Private Car Tax, which applies only to freight line companies such as the plaintiffs, Mo.Rev.Stat.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford Sosebee v. William Rath
Accord Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 250 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985) (Puerto Rico statute allowing attorneys’ fees should not be applied in admiralty action).
cited
Cited "see"
Yusov v. Yusuf
See Hatch v. Reliance Insurance Co., 758 F.2d 409, 416 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Yusov v. Yusuf
See Hatch v. Reliance Insurance Co., 758 F.2d 409, 416 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ghartey v. St. John's Queens Hospital
See Dowty v. Pioneer Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 770 F.2d 52, 57 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 572 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985) 3 Ghartey's complaint specifically characterized her second cause of action as a pendent state law claim.
cited
Cited "see"
Ghartey v. St. John's Queens Hospital
See Dowty v. Pioneer Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 770 F.2d 52, 57 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 572 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aikens v. Shalala
Keating, 848 F.2d at 275 ; see also Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 247 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985); Smith v. Detroit, 829 F.2d 1370 , 1374 (6th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaiser v. United States Postal Service
See also, Childs v. Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees, 831 F.2d 429, 434-435 (3d Cir.1987) (To require a district court to consider a suit by a plaintiff “who may yet prevail in the pending arbitration proceeding would be an intolerable drain on precious judicial resources.” Id.) Dowty v. Pioneer Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 770 F.2d 52, 56-57 (6th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 572 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985) — which the NRLCA relies upon in support of its “Plaintiff-had-knowledge-before-the-arbitration-award” argument — is enti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CAMOTEX, SRL v. Hunt
See, e.g., Davis v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 600 F.Supp. 1312, 1319 (D.Md.), aff'd, 769 F.2d 210 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 573 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985) (excessively broad class complaint alleging generalized racial discrimination claims does not satisfy notice requirements of American Pipe).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicely v. USX
See Scott v. Local 863, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 725 F.2d 226, 229 (3d Cir.1984) (citing Clayton v. Automobile Workers, 451 U.S. 679, 689-693 , 101 S.Ct. 2088, 2095-97 , 68 L.Ed.2d 538 (1981)); See also Dowty v. Pioneer Rural Electric Co-op., Inc., 770 F.2d 52, 56 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 572 , 88 L.Ed.2d 557 (1985) (limitations period begins to run when plaintiff knows or should have known of the union’s alleged breach); DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 588 F.Supp. 902, 909, n. 21 (D.Md.1984) affirmed 679 F.2d 879 (4th Cir.1984)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.
See Bosse v. Litton Unit Handling Systems, 646 F.2d 689, 695 (1st Cir.1981) (in diversity case, expert’s fees above statutory amount cannot be taxed under authority of Rule 54); see also Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 249-50 (1st Cir.) (similar), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1139, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,456, 27 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 198 Iver J. Freeman v. Package MacHinery Company
See Bosse v. Litton Unit Handling Systems, 646 F.2d 689, 695 (1st Cir.1981) (in diversity case, expert's fees above statutory amount cannot be taxed under authority of Rule 54); see also Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 249-50 (1st Cir.) (similar), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985). 67 Appellant asks that we treat this case as parading around the same old stamping ground and reduce the fees for plaintiff's experts drastically to conform with the section 1821 ceiling.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walters v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
See also Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 1 Cir.1985, 770 F.2d 245, 249-50 , cert. denied, 1985, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Bosse, supra, at 695 ; Paul N. Howard Co., supra, at 82.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hatch
v.
Reliance Insurance Co.
v.
Reliance Insurance Co.
No. 85-641.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1985.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.