green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2000 ·
…a prerequisite to success under section 2 on either a completed or attempted monopolization claim is proof of the relevant market.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
BEC Corp. v. Department of Environmental Protection
n light of the clear congressional intent to hold 'person' liable for violations, we see no reason to shield from civil liability those corporate officers who are personally involved or directly responsible for statutorily proscribed activity
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
O'DELL v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
a prerequisite to success under section 2 on either a completed or attempted monopolization claim is proof of the relevant market.
discussed
Cited "see"
Groom v. Fickes
See Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517, 522 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037 , 106 S.Ct. 605 , 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985) (holding that judicial immunity is not lost because of allegations of conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradt v. West
The judges of Texas courts have absolute immunity for their judicial acts “unless such acts fall clearly outside the judge’s subject-matter jurisdiction.” Spencer v. City of Seagoville, 700 S.W.2d 953, 957-58 (Tex.App.— Dallas 1985, no writ); see Holloway v. *67 Walker, 765 F.2d 517, 523 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037 , 106 S.Ct. 605 , 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985); Adams v. McIlhany, 764 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1101 , 106 S.Ct. 883 , 88 L.Ed.2d 918 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Frederick Leon Dotson v. J.J. Clark, Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution
See Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dept., 763 F.2d 757 , 760-761 (6th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 , 106 S.Ct. 604 , 88 L.Ed.2d 582 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
New Alaska Development Corp. v. Guetschow
See Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037 , 106 S.Ct. 605 , 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
New Alaska Development Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Bernd C. Guetschow, New Alaska Development Corporation, a New York Corporation, and J. Glen Cassity, Stockholder Individually v. Bernd C. Guetschow, New Alaska Development Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Ralph E. Moody, Personally and State of Alaska, New Alaska Development Corporation, a New York Corporation, and J. Glen Cassity, Stockholder Individually v. Ralph E. Moody, Personally and State of Alaska
See Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037 , 106 S.Ct. 605 , 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower, 763 F.2d 757 , 763 (6th Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 , 106 S.Ct. 604 , 88 L.Ed.2d 582 (1985); Robbins v. Maggio, 750 F.2d 405 , 410 n. 6 (5th Cir.1985); Slaughter v. City of Maplewood, 731 F.2d 587, 589 (8th Cir.1984). 9 Thus we doubt the continued viability of Caston .
discussed
Cited "see"
William A. Bell-Bey v. Heather Bur, Lajewski Pearson
See Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Department, 763 F.2d 757, 760 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 604 (1985). 6 For these reasons, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary in this appeal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sellers v. United States
McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838-39 (10th Cir.1985) (per curiam); see also, Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dep’t, 763 F.2d 757 , 760 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 , 106 S.Ct. 604 , 88 L.Ed.2d 582 (1985) (district courts, in considering an application for appointment of counsel, should at least consider plaintiffs financial resources, the efforts of plaintiff to obtain counsel, and whether plaintiffs claim appears to have any merit).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Central Maine Power Co.
In determining whether a judge has acted in the clear absence of all jurisdiction, “the scope of the judge’s jurisdiction must be construed broadly____” Stump, 435 U.S. at 356 , 98 S.Ct. at 1104 ; see also Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517, 523 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037 , 106 S.Ct. 605 , 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985). “[T]he fact that the power to take a given action is not expressly included in a judge’s jurisdiction ... is less significant than the fact that it is not expressly excluded from that jurisdiction.” Lopez v. Vanderwater, 620 F.2d at 1233 n. 4; see also Stump, 435…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dept., 763 F.2d 757, 763 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (“the question of appealability is the same whether counsel is sought under Title VII or 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 (d)”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 , 106 S.Ct. 604 , 88 L.Ed.2d 582 (1985); Robbins v. Maggio, 750 F.2d 405 , 410 n. 6 (5th Cir.1985) (“For purposes of the issue of appealability ... we find no significant legal distinction between a Title VII case and a § 1983 case.”); *1524 Bradshaw v. Zoological Soc. of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301 , 1305 n. 11 (9th Cir.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estate of Rockefeller
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 85-307.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1985.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.