green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Wheeler v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
See Christensen v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y, 767 F.2d 340, 343 (7th Cir.1985) (noting that "a lawful affirmative action program is not evidence of discrimination"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986). 10 We find MHTC's assertion to be unconvincing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wheeler v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
See Christensen v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, 767 F.2d 340, 343 (7th Cir.1985) (noting that “a lawful affirmative action program is not evidence of discrimination”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Milwaukee Area Technical College
See Christensen v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 767 F.2d 340, 343 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Biggins v. The Hazen Paper Co.
See Mother Goose Nursery Schools, Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668, 676 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biggins v. The Hazen Paper Co.
(2×)
See Mother Goose Nursery Schools, Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668, 676 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Kelkhoff
(2×)
See Mother Goose Nursery Sch., Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668 , 675 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Kelkhoff
(2×)
See Mother Goose Nursery Sch., Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668 , 675 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. Frye
See United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986); Howell v. Barker, 904 F.2d 889 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1016 , 111 S.Ct. 590 , 112 L.Ed.2d 595 (1990). .
examined
Cited "see"
Richard E. Maul v. Dr. Evan Constan, Anthony A. Metzcus and Richard Gore
(4×)
See Mother Goose Nursery Schools v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668 , 676 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986) 2 Plaintiff later "waived his original request for injunctive relief in light of the Agreed Entry filed in [the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana] in Anderson v. Orr, civil action [No.] S83-0481 on January 13, 1983" (Trial Br. at 1) 3 The dissent claims that "plaintiff's suit accomplished the public goal of forcing defendants to abide by their own regulations regarding involuntary medication" because it "is more …
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosalez v. State
(2×)
See Hurwitz v. State, 673 S.W.2d 347, 349-50 (Tex.App.—Austin 1984), aff'd on other grounds, 700 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Lee Curry
See United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 780 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 (1986). 10 Curry argues he suffered prejudice because the officers who arrested him have forgotten details of the incident.
discussed
Cited "see"
Market Force Incorporated v. Wauwatosa Realty Company
(2×)
See Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1059-61 (5th Cir.1985) (conspiracy found when hostile comments combined with predatory economic coercion and refusals to deal), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986); Penne v. Greater Minneapolis Area Bd. of Realtors, 604 F.2d 1143, 1148-49 (8th Cir.1979) (summary judgment should not have been granted where evidence of conspiracy included allegation of hostile comments, blacklisting, and punitive commission shares).
discussed
Cited "see"
Market Force Inc. v. Wauwatosa Realty Co.
(2×)
See Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1059-61 (5th Cir.1985) (conspiracy found when hostile comments combined with predatory economic coercion and refusals to deal), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986); Penne v. Greater Minneapolis Area Bd. of Realtors, 604 F.2d 1143, 1148-49 (8th Cir.1979) (summary judgment should not have been granted where evidence of conspiracy included allegation of hostile comments, blacklisting, and punitive commission shares).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Express Corporation v. Tennessee Public Service Commission
See Middle South Energy v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, 772 F.2d 404 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, Ratepayers Fight Back v. Middle South Energy, 474 U.S. 1102 (1986); Braniff International, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 576 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir.1978). 10 If the federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to decide whether the Airline Deregulation Act prohibits states from regulating Federal Express, then fifty states will examine the same federal preemption claim and reach varying results, in direct conflict with the Interstate Commerce Clause and Congressional intent. 11…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Del Socorro Pardo Viuda De Aguilar, United States of America v. Anthony Clark, A/K/A Antonio Clark, United States of America v. Sister Darlene Nicgorski, School Sisters of Saint Francis, United States of America v. Philip M. Willis-Conger, A/K/A Phillip M. Conger, United States of America v. John M. Fife, United States of America v. Margaret Jean Hutchison, A/K/A Peggy Hutchison, United States of America v. Wendy Lewin, United States of America v. Ramon Dagoberto Quinones
See United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 785 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986) (challenging sufficiency of the evidence on first amendment grounds); United States v. Little, 753 F.2d 1420, 1434 (9th Cir.1984) (seeking acquittal on first amendment grounds) 22 In their attack on the conspiracy counts, appellants cite another example of conduct allegedly warranting a clear-and-present danger instruction: "Sister Darlene Nicgorski's conversations with refugees, in which she offered assistance in finding lawyers and explained the process of applyin…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. de Aguilar
See United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 785 (9th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986) (challenging sufficiency of the evidence on first amendment grounds); United States v. Little, 753 F.2d 1420, 1434 (9th Cir.1984) (seeking acquittal on first amendment grounds). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aguilar
See United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 785 (9th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986) (challenging sufficiency of the evidence on first amendment grounds); United States v. Little, 753 F.2d 1420, 1434 (9th Cir. 1984) (seeking acquittal on first amendment grounds). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Del Socorro Pardo Viuda De Aguilar, United States of America v. Anthony Clark, A/K/A Antonio Clark, United States of America v. Sister Darlene Nicgorski, School Sisters of Saint Francis, United States of America v. Philip M. Willis-Conger, A/K/A Phillip M. Conger, United States of America v. John M. Fife, United States of America v. Margaret Jean Hutchison, A/K/A Peggy Hutchison, United States of America v. Wendy Lewin, United States of America v. Ramon Dagoberto Quinones
See United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 785 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986) (challenging sufficiency of the evidence on first amendment grounds); United States v. Little, 753 F.2d 1420, 1434 (9th Cir.1984) (seeking acquittal on first amendment grounds) 22 In their attack on the conspiracy counts, appellants cite another example of conduct allegedly warranting a clear-and-present danger instruction: "Sister Darlene Nicgorski's conversations with refugees, in which she offered assistance in finding lawyers and explained the process of applyin…
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum Institute
(2×)
See generally Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1059 (5th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986); Solomon v. Houston Corrugated Box Co., Inc., 526 F.2d 389, 395-96 (5th Cir.1976). 30 .
examined
Cited "see"
Robert Argento, Joseph Sansone and Bennie Lenard v. Village of Melrose Park, Bennie Lenard v. Robert Argento and Joseph Sansone, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant. Bennie Lenard v. Village of Melrose Park, Bennie Lenard v. Robert Argento and Joseph Sansone
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mother Goose Nursery Schools, Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668, 676 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Argento v. Village of Melrose Park
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mother Goose Nursery Schools, Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668, 676 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1059-61 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanchez v. State
(2×)
See Taylor v. State, 610 S.W.2d 471, 478 (Tex.Crim.App.1980) (opinion on motion for reh’g); see also Hurwitz v. State, 700 S.W.2d 919, 920 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Krinitt
See also *35 United States v. Moran (9th Cir. 1985), 759 F.2d 777, 780-83 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sun Refining & Marketing Company, Cross-Appellant v. Joseph E. Brennan, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See, e.g., Middle South Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, 772 F.2d 404, 417 (8th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986) (no legitimate state interest when state action pre-empt-ed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. Metz Group
(2×)
Compare Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1063 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986) and Cardio-Medical Assocs., Ltd. v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center, 721 F.2d 68, 75 (3d Cir.1983) and Construction Aggregate Transp., Inc. v. Florida Rock Indus., 710 F.2d 752 , 766-67 (11th Cir.1983) and Western Waste Serv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. The Metz Group
(2×)
Compare Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1063 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986) and Cardio-Medical Assocs., Ltd. v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center, 721 F.2d 68 , 75 (3d Cir.1983) and Construction Aggregate Transp., Inc. v. Florida Rock Indus., 710 F.2d 752 , 766-67 (11th Cir.1983) and Western Waste Serv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meat Price Investigators Ass'n v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1060 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation Mdl
(2×)
See, e.g., Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053, 1060 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. MacDonald Julius Jackson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 786 (9th Cir.1985) (upholding introduction of documents into evidence showing admissions of defendant), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Park v. El Paso Bd. of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 5.Ct. 884, 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986); Klapmeier v. Telecheck Int'l, Inc., 482 F.2d 247 (8th Cir.1973); Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Mach.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon E. McQuillen v. Wisconsin Education Association Council, Donald E. Krahn, and Morris Andrews
Compare Lanphear v. Prokop, 703 F.2d 1311, 1315 (D.C.Cir.1983) (court uses fact that employer was in process of adopting an affirmative action program as evidence of discriminatory animus against majority) with Christensen v. Equitable Life, 767 F.2d 340, 343 (7th Cir.1985) (existence of lawful affirmative action plan may not be used as evidence of discriminatory motivation), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 885 , 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rupe
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmy Henderson v. Sophia Lopez, Individually and as Assistant State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois
See, e.g., Mother Goose Nursery Schools, Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668, 670-75 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 884 , 88 L.Ed.2d 919 (1986) (Indiana Attorney General enjoys absolute immunity when determining legality of contract).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hurwitz
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 85-868.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1986.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.