green
Positive treatment
9.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tilley v. Mead Corporation
(2×)
But see Amato v. Western Union Int'l, 773 F.2d 1402 , 1414 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tilley v. Mead Corp.
(2×)
But see Amato v. Western Union Int’l, 773 F.2d 1402, 1414 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee
(2×)
See also Bencivenga v. Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, 763 F.2d 574 (3rd Cir.1985); Sutton v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp., 724 F.2d 406 (4th Cir.1983); but see Amato v. Western Union International Inc., 772, F.2d 1402 (2nd Cir.1985), cert. dismissed 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); American Stores v. American Stores Co. Retirement Plan, 716 F.Supp. 1392 (D.Utah 1989); Note, Changing the Rules of the Game: Pension Plan Terminations and Early Retirement Benefits, 87 Mich.L.Rev. 1034 (1989). 14 Accordingly, Counts Three and Eigh…
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
(2×)
See Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 201 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 289 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pocchia v. Prudential Insurance
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1418 (2d Cir.) (holding that statements in SPD reserving right to amend and indicating that the terms of the Plan “will govern in all cases” were unambiguous and precluded “any separate contract claim based solely on the language of the summary plan description”), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986), abrogated on other grounds, Mead Corp. v. Tilley, 490 U.S. 714 , 109 S.Ct. 2156 , 104 L.Ed.2d 796 (1989); Snyder v. Elliot W.
examined
Cited "see"
Gruby v. Brady
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263, 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982). 11 “[F]or the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1106 to apply, there must be a transaction involving the monies, property, or other assets of the fund.” Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 596 F.Supp. 963, 969 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (quoting Sutton v. Weirton Steel Div. of Nat’l Steel Corp., 567 F.Supp. 1184, 1199 (N.D.W.Va.1983), ajfd, 724 F.2d 406 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct. 2387 , 81 L.Ed.2d 345 (1984)), ajfd in part and rev’d in part on other gr…
discussed
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Elliot W. Dann Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1418 (2d Cir.1985) (“However, the [SPD] also reserves to [Defendants] the right to amend the Plan and states that the terms of the Plan and related trust agreement ‘will govern in all cases.’ These unambiguous provisions preclude any separate contract claim based solely on the language of the summary plan description.”), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); see also Osborne v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund, 783 F.Supp. 739, 743-44 (N.D.N.Y.1992), vacated on other …
discussed
Cited "see"
Westbrook v. Beverly Enterprises
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1416-17 (2nd Cir.1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986) (where the court reasoned an employer can “wear two hats” both as an employer and an administrator of the plan); Spink v. Lockheed Corporation, 1992 WL 437985 at *3 (C.D.Cal.) (“a defendant [can be] both an employer and [also] an administrator of a pension plan ... subject to separate and differing responsibilities depending upon the role it is performing.”) (Emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Woodard v. May Department Stores Co.
See Amrep v. F.T.C., 768 F.2d 1171 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1034 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 352 (1986); Thompson Medical Co. v. F.T.C., 791 F.2d 189 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086 , 107 S.Ct. 1289 , 94 L.Ed.2d 146 (1987); Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. F.T.C., supra. Comparative price advertising, if honestly done, is not misleading, and thus, it does not necessarily violate the CCPA.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kyle Railways, Inc. v. Pacific Administration Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 596 F.Supp. 963, 968-69 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (finding no § 406 prohibited transaction where no funds were transferred from the plan), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kyle Railways, Inc. v. Pacific Administration Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 596 F.Supp. 963, 968-69 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (finding no § 406 prohibited transaction where no funds were transferred from the plan), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Monroe
(2×)
See Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 201 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) (extraneous offenses, which were relevant to issue of identification, were admissible), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 289 (1986); Casey v. State, 708 S.W.2d 914, 918 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, pet. ref’d) (extraneous offense may become admissible if defendant raises issue of identity); Tex. R.CRIM.Evid. 404(b) (evidence of other wrongs may be admissible to show identity).
examined
Cited "see"
Peter J. Laniok v. Advisory Committee of the Brainerd Manufacturing Company Pension Plan
(4×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); Payonk v. HMW Indus., Inc., 883 F.2d 221 , 224-29 (3d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Associates in Adolescent Psychiatry v. Home Life Insurance
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1411-12 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caro v. State
(2×)
See Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 198 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 289 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williamson v. State
(2×)
See Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 205 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 289 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
George G. Blessitt and Willie Neal, Jr. v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co., Defendants
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union International Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986), and Tilley v. Mead Corp., 815 F.2d 989 (4th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ray v. State
(2×)
See Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 206 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 289 (1985); Laws v. State, 549 S.W.2d 738, 740 (Tex.Crim.App.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kreis v. Townley
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1415 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); Babb v. Olney Paint Co., 764 F.2d 240, 242 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kreis v. Charles Townley
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1415 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); Babb v. Olney Paint Co., 764 F.2d 240, 242 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local Union 2134, United Mine Workers of America, Etc., Plaintiff v. Powhatan Fuel, Inc., Etc., Leroy Osborne, Jr.
(2×)
See Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1416-17 (2nd Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Henne v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
See Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1418 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
See Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1416-1417 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); United Independent Flight Officers v. United Air Lines, Inc., 756 F.2d 1262, 1268 (7th Cir.1985); Sutton v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp., 724 F.2d 406 , 410-411 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct. 2387 , 81 L.Ed.2d 345 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abbey E. Blatt v. Marshall and Lassman (Formerly Known as Marshall, Lassman and Company), a Partnership, Louis v. Marshall and Joseph I. Lassman
See Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1416-17 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. dismissed, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F.2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 410 , 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); Donovan v. Mercer, 747 F.2d 304, 308 (5th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
IBP, Inc. v. Foust
(2×)
Compare Cummings v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 383, 390 (7th Cir.) (courts should only invoke federal common law of unjust enrichment in “limited circumstances”), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 648 , 93 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986) and Van Orman, 680 F.2d at 312 (no federal common law cause of action under doctrine of unjust enrichment when “such a right would override a contractual provision”), and Amato v. Western Union Int'l, 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir.1985) (no ERISA common law of unjust enrichment in “circumstances of this case”), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabois v. Jones
(2×)
Where the statute leaves an issue open and no federal common law exists to address it, however, “resort may be had to state law.” Krishna, 7 F.3d at 14 ; see also Amato v. Western Union Inti, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1419 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabois v. Jones
(2×)
Where the statute leaves an issue open and no federal common law exists to address it, however, "resort may be had to state law." Krishna, 7 F.3d at 14 ; see also Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1419 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986). 21 Application of federal--rather than New York--law to this dispute, instead of making the matter simpler, would raise even more questions on the record below.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund v. Office of Thrift Supervision
(2×)
Compare Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985) (trustee not a fiduciary when he does not act in his capacity as plan administrator), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund, Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle, Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Office of Thrift Supervision and T. Timothy Ryan, Director, Office of Thrift Supervision, Defendant-Counter-Claim-Plaintiffs-Appellants, Thomas A. Barnes Barry S. Burke Ronald B. Carreker Charles A. Deardorff Allen Dermody William J. Durbin Jane Marie Johnson Ronald R. Lake and Penny D. Marshall, Counter-Claim-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. James R. Faulstich Ronald R. Morphew John W. Bagwill, Jr. George M. Barclay John A. Becker J.C. Benage Leo B. Blaber, Jr. Larry J. Brandt James M. Cirona Stephen E. Clear Ramiro Luis Colon, Jr. Thurman C. Connell Brian D. Dittenhafer Charles T. Firth William H. Glencorse Lyle R. Grimes Michael A. Jessee Jerry H. Lassiter Frank A. Lowman Ellen Ann Roberts James D. Roy Robert E. Showfety Robert F. Stoico Charles L. Thiemann Norman L. Tirey Roy E. Webber Richard L. White and John B. Zanetti, Individually and as Directors of the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund, Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
Compare Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985) (trustee not a fiduciary when he does not act in his capacity as plan administrator), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Linder v. State
(2×)
Evid. 403; see also Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 201 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 289 (1986); Dickey v. State, 646 S.W.2d 232, 234 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); Chavez, 794 S.W.2d at 914 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transco Exploration Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See also Amato v. Western Union Int'l, 773 F.2d 1402 , 1412-13 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lea v. Republic Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986) (rejecting argument that company breached fiduciary duty simply by being both employer and plan administrator).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lea v. Republic Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Amato v. Western Union Int’l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986) (rejecting argument that company breached fiduciary duty simply by being both employer and plan administrator).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert L. Musto v. American General Corporation
(2×)
See also Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1417 (2d Cir.1985) (company officers “acted on behalf of a corporate employer and not as Plan fiduciaries in amending its pension plan”), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc., 804 F.2d 1418, 1432-33 (9th Cir.1986) (decision to terminate a pension plan was a business decision, not made by company in connection with its fiduciary responsibilities as plan administrator); Chait v. Bernstein, 645 F.Supp. 1092 (D.N.J.1986) (decisions of defendant to amend and terminat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. NVF Co.
(2×)
See also Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Herring v. State
Compare Moore v. State, 700 S.W.2d 193, 201 (Tex.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1167 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bigger v. American Commercial Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1414, 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986) (so long as employer funds plan at a level sufficient to cover accrued benefits, district court’s dismissal of claim brought under section 1104(a) is proper).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blatt v. Marshall and Lassman
See, e.g., Amato v. Western Union International, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402, 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986) (employers will be considered a fiduciary when they function as plan administrators but not when they conduct business unregulated by ERISA); Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corporation, 759 F.2d 1518, 1522 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 410 , 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985) (corporate executive deemed a fiduciary of a company-run ERISA plan though he was not named as a fiduciary); Donovan v. Mercer, 747 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1984) (“fidu…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bobby James Moore
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
85-6372 (A-609).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1986.
Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Certiorari.
Cited by 43 opinions | Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion
The application for stay of execution of the sentence of death presented to Justice WHITE and by him referred to the Court is denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is denied.
Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting:
Lead Opinion
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would grant the application for stay. Certiorari denied.Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant the application for stay and the petition for writ of certiorari and would vacate the death sentence in this case.