green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
“here was no evidence at the trial”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gaskin v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Dolphin , 195 Conn. 444 , 455-56, 488 A.2d 812 ("[e]vidence known to the defendant or his counsel, or that is disclosed, even if during trial, is not considered suppressed as that term is used in Brady "), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S.Ct. 103 , 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 449 , 488 A.2d 812 (“no evidence at the trial which could be said to raise the affirmative defense [of inoperability]”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hanks
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 450 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Massameno v. Statewide Grievance Committee
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 452 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Reddick
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 455-56 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Samuel E. Haley v. Bill Armontrout
See Cody v. Solem, 755 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S.Ct. 104 , 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bergin
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 456 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne E. Glenna
(2×)
See Cody v. Solem, 755 F.2d 1323, 1330 (8th Cir.) (“Simply put, a consent to search is not an incriminating statement.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S.Ct. 104 , 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985); Smith v. Wainright, 581 F.2d 1149, 1152 (5th Cir.1978) (“A consent to search is not a self-incriminating statement.”); United States v. Lemon, 550 F.2d 467, 472 (9th Cir.1977) (“A consent to search is not the type of incriminating statement toward which the fifth amendment is directed.
cited
Cited "see"
Samuel Theodore Wright v. R.M. Muncy, Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents
See Inge v. Procunier, 758 F.2d 1010 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Melillo
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 452 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Commonwealth
See Cody v. Solem, 755 F.2d 1323, 1331 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Utz
In reviewing instructions, we “will not sever one portion [of the charge] and analyze it in isolation from the rest.” State v. Vasquez, 182 Conn. 242, 246 , 438 A.2d 424 (1980); see State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 451 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Martin
Ed. 2d 116 (1982); see State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 459 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Shelnitz v. Greenberg
See State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 453 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Idelfonso Tapia-Rodriguez
See, e.g., Cody v. Solem, 755 F.2d 1323, 1330 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moore
See, e.g., State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 449 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Delgado
See, e.g., Inge v. Procunier, 758 F.2d 1010, 1015 (4th Cir.) (holding that “the identification of a truck is not governed by the constitutional *67 limitations that control the identification of a defendant”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S.Ct. 104 , 88 L.Ed.2d 85 (1985); Hughes v. State, 735 So.2d 238, 261 (Miss.1999) (en banc) (noting that “an examination of relevant authorities from federal and state law demonstrates that a ‘line-up’ to identify inanimate objects is not subject to the same constitutional restrictions which burden eyewitness identifications of criminal defendan…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Wayne Howard v. Orville Pung, Commissioner of Corrections and Frank Wood, Warden, Oak Park Heights Facility
See Stone, 428 U.S. at 494 & n. 36, 96 S.Ct. at 3052 & n. 36 (citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 313 , 83 S.Ct. 745, 757 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963)); see also Cody v. Solem, 755 F.2d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S.Ct. 104 , 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985); Hines v. Auger, 550 F.2d 1094, 1097 (8th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Littlejohn
“A judgment need not be reversed merely because inadmissible evidence has been admitted, if permissible evidence to the same effect has also been placed before the jury.” State v. Barber, 173 Conn. 153, 160 , 376 A.2d 1108 (1977); see also State v. Dolphin, 195 Conn. 444, 454-55 , 488 A.2d 812 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833 , 106 S. Ct. 103 , 88 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Manzur
v.
McCotter, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
McCotter, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
No. 84-6761.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.