green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hackford v. Babbitt
But cf. Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 647 F.2d 42, 51 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1092 , 102 S.Ct. 657 , 70 L.Ed.2d 630 (1981), appeal after remand, 752 F.2d 397 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986) (holding that non-Indian successors obtain a reserved right with a reservation priority date but must put the reserved right to use with reasonable diligence or lose it) 4 The current UDC stockholders include: the original mixed-bloods, those who have inherited stock from the original mixed-bloods, full-blood and mixed-blood purch…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hackford v. Babbitt
But cf. Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 647 F.2d 42, 51 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1092 , 102 S.Ct. 657 , 70 L.Ed.2d 630 (1981), appeal after remand, 752 F.2d 397 (9th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986) (holding that non-Indian successors obtain a reserved right with a reservation priority date but must put the reserved right to use with reasonable diligence or lose it). .
cited
Cited "see"
Trinidad v. United States of America
See id. at 356 (citing Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971 , 980 2 ||(9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Local 391, Council 4, AFSCME v. Department of Correction
See Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180, 184-85 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S. Ct. 1184 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adeniji, Adetoro
United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225, 1240 (7th Cir. 1981); accord, United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116, 1124 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S. Ct. 1183 (1986); United States v. Camiel, 689 F.2d 31, 36 (3rd Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adetoro Adeniji, Ademola G. Allismith, and Abdul R. Adediran
United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225, 1240 (7th Cir.1981); accord, United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116, 1124 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); United States v. Camiel, 689 F.2d 31, 36 (3rd Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
VAW of America, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of America
See Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of Am., AFL-CIO-CLC, 768 F.2d 180, 188 (7th Cir.1985) (Posner, J.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); see also Hill, 147 F.3d *194 at 212 (“‘[A]s long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority, that a court is convinced he committed serious error does not suffice to overturn his decision.’ ”) (quoting Misco, 484 U.S. at 38 , 108 S.Ct. 364 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Trafalgar House Construction, Inc. v. MSL Enterprises, Inc.
See Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers, 768 F.2d 180, 188 (7th Cir. 1985) (remand to arbitration panel for clarification of the award is disfavored procedure), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fidelity Bank National Ass'n v. Aldrich
See Beerly v. Dept. of the Treasury, 768 F.2d 942, 945 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986) (upholding the OCC’s exclusion of market value in its-appraisal); see also, Boone v. Carlsbad Bancorporation, Inc., 972 F.2d 1545, 1553 (10th Cir.1992) (holding the OCC’s -determination to be reasonable despite the fact that the OCC assigned no weight to the market value of the stock on the grounds that the stock was thinly traded during the three years preceding the merger and because most of the trades took place between insiders and/or control group…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Red Elk
See United States v. Carr, 764 F.2d 496, 498-99 (8th Cir.1985) (no prejudice where grand jury before which an FBI agent was improperly characterized as “an agent of the grand jury” did not hand down the indictment against defendant), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dieter Stussy v. City of Los Angeles City of Long Beach United States of America
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 977 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986); see also Hunsucker v. Sunnyvale Hilton Inn, 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 722, 726 (finding report to police about gun in hotel room to be privileged and not subject to liability).
cited
Cited "see"
Pritchett v. Russell
See Arsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 982 (9th Cir.1985) (noting that reliance on advice of counsel may warrant qualified immunity), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
John v. Colen v. United States of America State of California
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 980 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dean Foods Co. v. United Steel Workers of America
See Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of Am., 768 F.2d 180, 184 (7th Cir.1985) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dale v. Kelley
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 982 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garza v. United States
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 979-80 (9th Cir.1985) (Government may invoke state-law privilege for law enforcement officers making arrests pursuant to warrant that is regular in form and issued by a court with jurisdiction), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 73 (2d Cir.1983) (INS officer’s detention of person entering country privileged under New York law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Getrost v. U.S. Through I.R.S.
See id. 11 Further, although 5 U.S.C. § 702 waives the government's sovereign immunity in actions against government agencies seeking non-monetary relief, section 702 does not affect other limitations on judicial review or override statutes which expressly or impliedly forbid a party from seeking the relief sought.
cited
Cited "see"
Torres v. United States
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 980 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1975); Holloman v. Watt, 708 F.2d 1399, 1401-02 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 958 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderic Carter
See United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116, 1121 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Ray Jones and John Glen Jones
See United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116, 1123 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986). 21 Furthermore, the danger of prejudice was minimized by the district court's instructions to separately consider the evidence as it related to each offense and defendant.
cited
Cited "see"
NoDak Bancorporation v. Clarkson
See Beerly v. Department of Treasury, 768 F.2d 942 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloomington National Bank v. Telfer
See Beerly v. Department of the Treasury, 768 F.2d 942, 944-45 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986); Nehring v. First DeKalb Bancshares, Inc., 692 F.2d 1138, 1141-42 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloomington National Bank, Hoosier Bancshares, Incorporated, Frank A. Rogers, Joseph R. Hartley, Robert W. Linnemeier, Robert D. Mann and Richard M. Leagre v. James S. Telfer, Rudolph T. Kuehn, as of the Estate of Sophie T. Kuehn, Robert S. Telfer, Jr. And John T. Barrett, Defendants/counterclaimants and Third-Party v. Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency, Third-Party
See Beerly v. Department of the Treasury, 768 F.2d 942, 944-45 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986); Nehring v. First DeKalbBancshares, Inc., 692 F.2d 1138, 1141-42 (7th Cir.1982). 19 Bloomington's reorganization plan clearly violates the National Banking Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a United States Corporation v. Bank of Boulder, a Colorado Corporation
(2×)
See FDIC v. All Souls Episcopal Church, 769 F.2d 658, 662 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); FDIC v. Leach, 772 F.2d 1262, 1264 (6th Cir.1985); Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982), overruled on other grounds, Langley v. FDIC, 484 U.S. 86 , 108 S.Ct. 396 , 98 L.Ed.2d 340 (1987); FDIC v. Ashley, 585 F.2d 157, 160 (6th Cir.1978); FDIC v. Godshall, 558 F.2d 220 , 222 n. 4 (4th Cir.1977); Freeling v. Sebring, 296 F.2d 244, 245 (10th Cir.1961); FDIC v. Hudson, 643 F.Su…
examined
Cited "see"
V-1 Oil Company, a Wyoming Corporation v. State of Wyoming, Department of Environmental Quality Steven P. Gerber
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971 (9th Cir.1985) (defendant did not violate clearly established law), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1086); Wells v. Dallas Independent School Dist., 576 F.Supp. 497, 508-09 (N.D.Tex.1983) (law unclear); Alexander v. Alexander, 573 F.Supp. 373, 376 (M.D.Tenn.1983) (Attorney advice was used by the court to show that defendant did not violate clearly established law.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark Wellington
(2×)
See United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116, 1125 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); United States v. Merrill, 746 F.2d 458, 465 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1165 , 105 S.Ct. 926 , 83 L.Ed.2d 938 (1985); Thor v. United States, 574 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloomington National Bank v. Telfer
See 12 U.S.C. §§ 214a-215a. 2 As reflected in Beerly v. Department of the Treasury, 768 F.2d 942 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986), and in Nehring v. First DeKalb Bancshares, Inc., 692 F.2d 1138 (7th Cir.1982), these sections of the Act provide a way for a national bank that wants to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of a holding company to do so and cash out minority shareholders in full compliance with the law.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986). 18 This overstatement defrauded Schultz just as surely as would inflating the tapping charges from “normal” and “fair” to “above normal.” 19 *866 Therefore, the government successfully alleged an offense since the Superseding Indictment describes mailings which were an inherent part of the scheme to inflate the tapping charges and defraud present and future property owners in the Squirrel Bend subdivision.
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Jenkins and Stanley Hodges, & Cross-Appellees v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc., & Cross-Appellant
See Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180, 1984 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Watertown Equipment Company v. Norwest Bank Watertown, N.A.
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 981 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Watertown Equipment Co. v. Norwest Bank Watertown, N.A.
See Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 981 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Independent Employees' Union of Hillshire Farm Company, Inc., and Lydia Tratz v. Hillshire Farm Company, Inc.
See Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers, 768 F.2d 180, 183-84 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salamone, Salvatore
(2×)
See — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1182 , 89 L.Ed.2d 299 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jefferson
See Tison v. Arizona, cert. granted, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1182 , 89 L.Ed.2d 299 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tri-State Business v. Lanier Worldwide Inc
"Thus, a court is permitted to interpret and enforce an ambiguous award if the ambiguity can be resolved from the record." Flender, 953 F.2d at 280 (citations omitted); see also Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers, 768 F.2d 180, 188 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tri-State Business MacHines, Inc. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc.
“Thus, a court is permitted to interpret and enforce an ambiguous award if the ambiguity can be resolved from the record.” Flender, 953 F.2d at 280 (citations omitted); see also Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers, 768 F.2d 180, 188 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Sealey
The People were under no duty to investigate the psychiatric history of the victim and obtain her psychiatric records (see, People v Diaz, supra, at 446; see also, United States v Bibby, 752 F2d 1116, 1125, cert denied 475 US 1010 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Douglas R. Prince and Jane Prince, Debtors-Appellants
See also Beerly v. Dept. of Treasury, 768 F.2d 942, 946 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. Easter Enterprises, Inc.
Furthermore, the courts will “resolve any reasonable doubt about whether an award draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement in favor of enforcing the award,” Polk Bros. v. Chicago Truck Drivers Union, 973 F.2d 593 , 596 (7th Cir.1992); see also, Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986), and “ ‘[i]t is only when the arbitrator must have based his award on some body of thought, or feeling, or policy, or law that is outside the contract’ that the award can be said no…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manuela Rodriguez v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 978-79 (9th Cir.1985) (government liability for false arrest under FTCA determined in light of privilege accorded law enforcement officer effecting arrest), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 74 (2d Cir.1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. United States
See, e.g., Arnsberg v. United States, 757 F.2d 971, 978-79 (9th Cir. 1985) (government liabili- ty for false arrest under FTCA determined in light of privilege accorded law enforcement officer effecting arrest), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 (1986); Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 74 (2d Cir. 1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. United States
See, e.g., Arnsberg v. United ___ ____ ________ ______ States, 757 F.2d 971, 978-79 (9th Cir. 1985) (government liabili- ______ ty for false arrest under FTCA determined in light of privilege accorded law enforcement officer effecting arrest), cert. denied, _____ ______ 475 U.S. 1010 (1986); Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 74 (2d _____ _____________ Cir. 1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonnell/Tredegar Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See also Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180, 186 (7th Cir.1985) ("there is no rule that an arbitrator, in order to find an implied condition, must first find the language of the [labor] contract to be ambiguous”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonnell/tredegar Industries, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Bonnell/tredegar Industries, Incorporated
See also Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180, 186 (7th Cir.1985) ("there is no rule that an arbitrator, in order to find an implied condition, must first find the language of the [labor] contract to be ambiguous"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986) 6 A union's right to bargain over a mandatory term can be waived, but the party asserting waiver must show the right to bargain was clearly and unmistakably relinquished.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 371 v. Logistics Support Group
See, e.g., Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180, 186 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company
See also Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 752 F.2d 397, 401 (9th Cir.1985) (on remand, district court shall act in accordance with the mandate "in light of [the] opinion" (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
470 Stratford Holding Co. v. Local 32B-32J, Service Employees International Union
Leed, 916 F.2d at 65-66 ; see also Ethyl Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America, 768 F.2d 180, 186 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1184 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See also Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 752 F.2d 397, 401 (9th Cir.1985) (on remand, district court shall act in accordance with the mandate “in light of [the] opinion” (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See also Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 752 F.2d 397, 401 (9th Cir.1985) (on remand, district court shall act in accordance with the mandate “in light of [the] opinion” (internal quotations omitted)), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company
See also Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 752 F.2d 397, 401 (9th Cir.1985) (on remand, district court shall act in accordance with the mandate "in light of [the] opinion" (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 1183 , 89 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tison
v.
Arizona (two cases)
v.
Arizona (two cases)
No. 84-6075.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.