green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…in rare circumstances the district court can increase a fee award because of the quality of the work performed or the great public interest involved.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Ofchinick
See, e.g., United States v. Walsh, 700 F.2d 846, 857 (2d Cir.) (ownership interest in racketeering enterprise forfeited rather than the value of that interest), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 825 , 104 S.Ct. 96 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983); but cf. United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc) (holding that the proceeds of illegal activity need no longer be in existence in order to be subject to forfeiture), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Ofchinick
See, e.g., United States v. Walsh, 700 F.2d 846, 857 (2d Cir.) (ownership interest in racketeering enterprise forfeited rather than the value of that interest), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 825 , 104 S.Ct. 96 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983); but cf. United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc) (holding that the proceeds of illegal activity need no longer be in existence in order to be subject to forfeiture), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Deary v. City of Gloucester
(2×)
in rare circumstances the district court can increase a fee award because of the quality of the work performed or the great public interest involved.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
See United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798, 803 (7th Cir.1985)(en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986) (rejecting argument that Congress intended to limit forfeiture to include only the property titled to defendant at the time of conviction).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. In the Interest of J.L.M.
See Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412, 421 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 LEd.2d 410 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sokaogon Chippewa Community v. Babbitt
See Florida Dept. of Business Regulation v. United States Dept. of the Interior, 768 F.2d 1248, 1256-57 (11th Cir.1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986) (decision to acquire land in trust pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 465 is committed to Secretary’s discretion and is not *1176 subject to judicial review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Havasu Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Babbitt
See, e.g., Alaska v. Babbitt ("Foster" Allotment), No. 94-35677, slip op. 225 (Jan. 11, 1996) (applying the QTA's Indian lands exception to dismiss a suit by the state of Alaska claiming a state highway right-of-way through land allotted to an Alaskan Native); Alaska v. Babbitt ("Albert" Allotment), 38 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir.1994) (same); Metropolitan Water Dist. v. United States, 830 F.2d 139 (9th Cir.1987) ("MWD") (applying the QTA to a dispute involving determination of the boundaries of a reservation in order to establish the extent of the Tribe's water rights), aff'd sub nom California v. Uni…
cited
Cited "see"
Kootznoowoo, Inc. v. Spang
See Florida v. United States Dept. of Interior, 768 F.2d 1248, 1251 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bates v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
The weight of authority, such as it is, establishes that under appropriate circumstances “an intervenor can continue to litigate after dismissal of the party who originated the action.” United States Steel Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 614 F.2d 843, 845 (3d Cir.1979) (citing cases); accord, Harris v. Amoco Production Co., 768 F.2d 669, 675-676 (5th Cir.1985) (citing cases), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986) (court may enter money judgment against defendant where profits from racketeering cannot be traced to identifiable assets), and United States v. Conner, 752 F.2d 566 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 821 , 106 S.Ct. 72 , 88 L.Ed.2d 59 (1985) (same)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saccoccia
See United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798, 801 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986) (§ 1963(a)(1)); United States v. Navarro-Ordas, 770 F.2d 959, 969-70 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied sub nom., Rodriguez v. United States, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1200 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986) (§ 1963(a)(1)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lucero ex rel. Chavez v. City of Albuquerque
See Harris v. Amoco Production Co., 768 F.2d 669, 675 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bailey, 750 F.2d 577, 583 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1100 , 105 S.Ct. 2324 , 85 L.Ed.2d 842 (1985); and Moosehead Sanitary Dist. v. S.G.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinney v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.
See Haddon House Food Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 764 F.2d 182 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986) (rival nonincumbent union committed an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(b)(1)(A) by accepting recognition of employer even if it was unaware that its rival had filed a valid representation petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
SOUTHEASTERN PEANUT ASSN. v. Lyng
See State of Florida, Dep’t of Business Regulation v. United States Dep’t of the Interior, 768 F.2d 1248, 1255 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); and, Greenwood Util.
discussed
Cited "see"
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
See, e.a State of Florida Den't of Business Reuulation v. United States DeD't of Interior, 768 F.2d 1248 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 (1986) (challenge by various state agencies to Secretary of Interior's acceptance of tract of land to be held in trust for benefit of Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scarpa
See Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. at 424, 428, 106 S.Ct. at 1142, 1145 .
discussed
Cited "see"
MARRIAGE OF LOVELAND v. Loveland
See In re Marriage of Mastropaolo, 213 Cal. Rptr. 26, 29 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985) cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 (1986) (retirement pay based on disability but which replaces "retirement” pension and is partly computed on service longevity and rank provides support for serviceman and wife on retirement); and In re Marriage of Cullen, 193 Cal. Rptr. 590, 593 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 (1984) (that husband waived retirement pay to receive disability pension of greater amount does not deprive wife of community property right).
examined
Cited "see"
Samuel L. McDonald Gerald M. Smith Rayfield Newlon Thomas Battle Alan J. Bannister, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Bill Armontrout Lee Roy Black Donald W. Wyrick John D. Ashcroft, Samuel L. McDonald Gerald M. Smith Rayfield Newlon Thomas Battle Alan J. Bannister, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Bill Armontrout Lee Roy Black Donald W. Wyrick John D. Ashcroft
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux v. City of Prior Lake, 771 F.2d 1153, 1160-61 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
McDonald v. Armontrout
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux v. City of Prior Lake, 771 F.2d 1153, 1160-61 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See American Financial Services v. F.T.C., 767 F.2d 957 , 965-72 (D.C.Cir.1985) (“A.F.S.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Monsanto
(2×)
See United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798, 801 (7th Cir.1985) (while government's interest in profits or proceeds of racketeering activity does not attach until conviction, its interest vests at the time of the act that constitutes the racketeering violation), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a Public Agency of the State of California, and the Coachella Valley Water District, a Public Agency of the State of California v. The United States of America Donald P. Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, and Quechan Indian Tribe Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, and Colorado River Indian Tribes, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of California and State of Arizona
See Florida Dept. of Business Regulation v. United States Dept. of Interior, 768 F.2d 1248, 1253-55 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Water District v. United States
See Florida Dept. of Business Regulation v. United States Dept. of Interior, 768 F.2d 1248, 1253-55 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See American Financial Services Association v. FTC, 767 F.2d 957, 985 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
CONSUMERS UNION OF v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
See American Financial Services Association v. FTC, 767 F.2d 957, 985 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. State
See also Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412, 421 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 1141, 89 LEd.2d 410, 421 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Companies Lending Corp. v. Sargeant
(2×)
See, e.g., American Financial Services Association v. Federal Trade Commission, 767 F.2d 957 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilkerson
See, e.g., United States v. Purvis, 768 F.2d 1237 (11th Cir.1985) (finding that a five-day delay was not unnecessary delay, the court did not decide the issue of whether dismissal would be an appropriate remedy), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Katz's Delicatessen of Houston Street, Inc.
Id; see Bruckner, 262 N.L.R.B. at 957; see also Haddon House Food Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 764 F.2d 182 , 186 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Katz's Delicatessen Of Houston Street, Inc.
Id; see Bruckner, 262 N.L.R.B. at 957; see also Haddon House Food Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 764 F.2d 182 , 186 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Viegers
See, e.g., United States v. Purvis, 768 E2d 1237, (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sammy Parker Flynt
See also, United States v. Esposito, 771 F.2d 283, 285 (7th Cir.1985) (indictment naming a business entity as the victim was not amended by evidence establishing the victimization of the owner-operator), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Houghton v. Sipco, Inc.
(4×)
Id. at 895-96 n. 11, 104 S.Ct. at 1547 n. 11. 10 Thus, “where an attorney requesting fees has well-defined billing rates, those rates can be used to help calculate a reasonable rate for a fee award.” McDonald v. Armontrout, 860 F.2d 1456, 1459 (8th Cir.1988); see also Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community v. City of Prior Lake, Minn., 771 F.2d 1153, 1160-61 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Delco Wire and Cable Co., Inc.
See also United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798, 801 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cunningham v. Rolfe
See, e.g., Harris v. Amoco Production Co., 768 F.2d 669, 675 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See, e.g., State of Florida Dep't of Business Regulation v. United States Dep't of Interior, 768 F.2d 1248 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 (1986) (challenge by various state agencies to Secretary of Interior's acceptance of tract of land to be held in trust for benefit of Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota
(2×)
Cf., Washington v. Yakima *1514 Indian Nation, 439 U.S. 463 , 99 S.Ct. 740 , 58 L.Ed.2d 740 (1979) (upholding Washington assumption of Public Law 280 jurisdiction without tribal consent when Washington statute predated ICRA amendment of Public Law 280); see also Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community v. Prior Lake, 771 F.2d 1153 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986) (tribal consent not required when Minnesota municipality annexes reservation land since Minnesota obtained Public Law 280 jurisdiction under the original language enacted in 1953).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nichols
See, e.g., United States v. Alexander, 741 F.2d 962, 967-68 (7th Cir.1984), overruled, United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986) 3 Our analysis is aided by a wealth of academic discussions of the application of the 1984 criminal forfeiture provisions to attorneys' fees.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nichols
See, e.g., United States v. Alexander, 741 F.2d 962, 967-68 (7th Cir.1984), overruled, United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1186 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perras v. Perras
See also Luna v. Luna, 125 Ariz. 120 , 608 P.2d 57 (App.1979) and In re Marriage of Mastropaolo, 166 Cal.App.3d 953 , 213 Cal.Rptr. 26 (1985), cert. denied,—U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1185 , 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
v.
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
v.
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
No. 85-758.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.