green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…the harmless error' rule applies to a breach of a judge's duty to stand recused under 455(a)
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 47 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.
the harmless error' rule applies to a breach of a judge's duty to stand recused under 455(a)
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. LILJEBERG ENTERPRISES, INC
the harmless error' rule applies to a breach of a judge's duty to stand recused under 455(a)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradley
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1535-36 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Jenkins, 442 F.2d 429, 438 (5th Cir.1971); cf. Wright v. Smith, 569 F.2d 1188, 1190-91 (2d Cir.1978) (off-the-record bench conference in state proceedings). .
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor-Boren v. Isaac
SHAMAN ET AL., JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS § 4.15, at 125-26 (2d ed. 1995); see United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1538 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Jonas Stelmokas, A/K/A Jonas Stelmokevicius
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Kowalchuk, 773 F.2d 488, 496-97 (3d Cir.1985) (in banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stelmokas
See United States v. Kowalchuk, 773 F.2d 488, 496-97 (3d Cir. 1985) (in banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
James H. Gary v. Pension Fund of International Union of Operating Engineers, 478
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1041 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martino v. First National Bank of Harvey (In Re Garofalo's Finer Foods, Inc.)
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1539 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Union Carbide Corp. v. U.S. Cutting Serv., Inc., 782 F.2d 710 , 716-17 (7th Cir.1986); Dele sdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 120-23 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982) (where the court rejected the decision in SCA Services on its merits); see also Schurz Communications, Inc. v. F.C.C., 982 F.2d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir.1992) (Posner, J.) (characterizing SCA Services as “weak precedent” since it did not cite United States…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Strawberry
See United States v. Marchant, 774 F.2d 888, 891 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1190 , 89 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adam Stillo, Sr. And Joseph T. Stillo
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Siskind v. The Sperry Retirement Program
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1040 (2d Cir.1985) (amendment which reduced retiree's benefits arbitrary and capricious because not in interests of plan participants and beneficiaries), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Agro v. Joint Plumbing Indus.
discussed
Cited "see"
Siskind v. Sperry Retirement Program, Unisys
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1040 (2d Cir.1985) (amendment which reduced retiree’s benefits arbitrary and capricious because not in interests of plan participants and beneficiaries), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Agro v. Joint Plumbing Indus.
discussed
Cited "see"
El Fenix De Puerto Rico v. the M/Y Johanny
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1541 (7th Cir.1985) (pre-Liljeberg ease under § 455(a), holding that an “appearance of impropriety is not enough to poison the prior acts ” of recused judge) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1536 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1536 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Elliot W. Dann Co., Inc.
See Lee v. Burkhart, 991 F.2d 1004, 1009 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1041 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986)); Gridley v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co., 924 F.2d 1310, 1318-19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1232 , 111 S.Ct. 2856 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1023 (1991); see also Donnelly v. Bank of New York Co., 801 F.Supp. 1247, 1253 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (“courts are ‘reluctant to apply the estoppel doctrine to require the payment of pension funds’ because ‘[t]he actuarial soundness of pension funds i…
cited
Cited "see"
Iwans v. Aetna Life Ins. Corp.
See Lee, 991 F.2d at 1009 (citing Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1039 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Morris R. Gardner v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 (1986) (upholding suspension of benefit rules).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David J. Shields and Pasquale F. Deleo
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1530 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 .
cited
Cited "see"
Earl Lee and David Abramson v. Richard Burkhart and Patrick Sullivan, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1039 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd E. Humphreys
See United States v. Marchant, 774 F.2d 888 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1190 , 89 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986), for a pre-amendment decision. 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana Waste Systems, Inc. v. County of Porter
See Fromm v. Rosewell, 771 F.2d 1089, 1091-92 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Seff v. National Organization of Industrial Trade Unions Insurance Trust Fund
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1041 (2d Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinney v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.
(2×)
See Haddon House Food Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 764 F.2d 182 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986) (rival nonincumbent union committed an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(b)(1)(A) by accepting recognition of employer even if it was unaware that its rival had filed a valid representation petition).
cited
Cited "see"
First City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1529-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); See also New York v. Joseph L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Rooney
See United States v. Marchant, 774 F.2d 888, 891 (8th Cir.1985) (taxpayer “permitted his accountant to carry false information into the [district of prosecution] and there to prepare and attest returns”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1190 , 89 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986); United States v. Gross, 276 F.2d 816, 820 (2d Cir.) (taxpayer “sent incomplete and therefore untrue and incorrect information to the preparer in [the district of prosecution, and] the preparer thereupon prepared and attested returns in that district, which, while true on the basis of the information given him, were in…
cited
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Company
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) The statutory standard puts to the judge a question about the objective state of the legal and lay culture.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 602 F.Supp. 904 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (Carter, J.), aff'd, 772 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1539 (7th Cir. *1302 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Frasch
See United States v. Esposito, 771 F.2d 283, 286 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); United States v. Ambrose, 740 F.2d 505, 511-12 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3479 , 87 L.Ed.2d 614 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bradley
The Government must prove that [the victims] reasonably believed they had no alternative to continue working other than imprisonment or worse." 4 Accord United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1535-36 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Jenkins, 442 F.2d 429, 438 (5th Cir.1971); cf. Wright v. Smith, 569 F.2d 1188, 1190-91 (2d Cir.1978) (off-the-record bench conference in state proceedings). 5 Some circuits are indulgent where an objection on the record cross-references what was said in an off-the-record charge conference, see U…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salemme
See also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1540 (7th Cir.1985) (“Section 455(a) is concerned with perceptions rather than actual defects in the administration of justice.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Katz's Delicatessen Of Houston Street, Inc.
(2×)
Id; see Bruckner, 262 N.L.R.B. at 957; see also Haddon House Food Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 764 F.2d 182 , 186 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Katz's Delicatessen of Houston Street, Inc.
(2×)
Id; see Bruckner, 262 N.L.R.B. at 957; see also Haddon House Food Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 764 F.2d 182 , 186 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherman v. State
The test for determining whether the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned is an objective test that assumes that "a reasonable person knows and understands all the relevant facts.” In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc., 861 F.2d 1307 , 1313 (2d Cir. 1988) (emphasis omitted), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1102 (1989); see also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1538 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherman v. State
The test for determining whether the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned is an objective test that assumes that "a reasonable person knows and understands all the relevant facts." In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc., 861 F.2d 1307 , 1313 (2d Cir.1988) (emphasis omitted), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1102 , 109 S.Ct. 2458 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1989); see also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 , *379 1538 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny Lavern Collins
See also United States v. Farrell, 877 F.2d 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 922 , 110 S.Ct. 289 , 107 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989) (extortionate sum demanded from individuals so high that it "would have affected interstate commerce to a legally cognizable degree"), and United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) (payment of bribes by lawyers depleted aggregate ability to purchase law books and office supplies that moved in interstate commerce) 22 United States v. Buffey, 899 F.2d 1402, 1404 (4th Cir.1990) 23 United S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Collins
See also United States v. Farrell, 877 F.2d 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 922 , 110 S.Ct. 289 , 107 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989) (extortionate sum demanded from individuals so high that it "would have affected interstate commerce to a legally cognizable degree"), and United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) (payment of bribes by lawyers depleted aggregate ability to purchase law books and office supplies that moved in interstate commerce). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sammy Parker Flynt
See also, United States v. Esposito, 771 F.2d 283, 285 (7th Cir.1985) (indictment naming a business entity as the victim was not amended by evidence establishing the victimization of the owner-operator), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 , 106 S.Ct. 1187 , 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James M. Eliason
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1532 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Lyons, 670 F.2d 77, 80 (7th Cir.) (“[a]ny agreement [concerning immunity] made by the government must be scrupulously performed and kept”), cert. denied, 457 *1153 U.S. 1136, 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1539-41 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1094-95 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984); cf., Jenkins v. Sterlacci, 849 F.2d 627, 634-35 (D.C.Cir.1988) (holding that the defendant's participation, without objection, in the hearing before a special master constituted a waiver of his claim that the special master should have disqualified himself under Canon 3 C(l) of the Code of Judicial Conduct for United Stat…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C & F Packing Co. v. Doskocil Companies, Inc.
See also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1537 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barksdale v. Emerick
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1538-39 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Portashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1114-15 (5th Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barksdale v. Emerick
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1538-39 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Portasknick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1114-15 (5th Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel F. Marrinson
United States v. Lawhon, 499 F.2d 352, 355 (5th Cir.1974) (venue in a § 7206(1) case), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1121 , 95 S.Ct. 804 , 42 L.Ed.2d 820 (1975); United States v. King, 563 F.2d 559, 562 (2d Cir.1977) (§§ 7201 & 7206(1) case) (dicta), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1476 , 55 L.Ed.2d 510 (1978); see also United States v. Marchant, 774 F.2d 888, 891 (8th Cir.1985) (§ 7201 case), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juozas Kungys
See also United States v. Kowalchuk, 773 F.2d 488, 493 (3d Cir.1985) (in banc) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 303 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vicars
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (Eppler, Real Parties in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (Eppler, Real Parties in Interest)
No. 85-876.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.