green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…t is an employer's business prerogative to develop as many arbitrary, ridiculous and irrational rules as it sees fit
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Virginia L. Stemmons v. MO. Dept. of Corr.
t is an employer's business prerogative to develop as many arbitrary, ridiculous and irrational rules as it sees fit
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Virginia L. Stemmons v. Missouri Department of Corrections
t is an employer's business prerogative to develop as many arbitrary, ridiculous and irrational rules as it sees fit
discussed
Cited "see"
Omotosho v. Giant Eagle, Inc.
After Duren and Taylor , circuit courts, including the Sixth Circuit, have stated that a group is not systematically excluded if prospective jurors are “gathered without active discrimination.” Polk, 1996 WL 47110 at *2 (emphasis added); see Barber v. Ponte, 772 F.2d 982, 997 (1st Cir.1985) (“courts have tended to allow a fair degree of leeway in designating jurors so long as the state or community does not actively prevent people from serving or actively discriminate” [emphasis in original] ), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1272 , 89 L.Ed.2d 580 (1986); United States v. Cecil…
discussed
Cited "see"
Debra L. Herr v. Airborne Freight Corporation
(2×)
See Smith v. Monsanto Chemical Co., 770 F.2d 719 , 723 n. 3 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Debra Herr v. Airborne Freight
See Smith v. Monsanto Chemical Co., 770 F.2d 719 , 723 n.3 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Partee v. Cook County Sheriff's Office
See Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Authority, 770 F.2d 676, 680 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eads v. Derwinski
See Willis v. Newsome, 747 F.2d 605, 606 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1985); cf. Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 375 U.S. 384, 387-388 , 84 S.Ct. 397, 398-399 , 11 L.Ed.2d 404 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Roland Knox v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Lsp
See Barber v. Ponte, 772 F.2d 982, 998 (1st Cir.1985) (en banc) (taking judicial notice of census data in habeas case), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1272 , 89 L.Ed. 580 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherman v. Standard Rate Data Service, Inc.
See Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Authority, 770 F.2d 676, 679 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986). 9 For all of the above-discussed reasons, Standard Rate’s motion to dismiss Count II of plaintiff’s amended complaint must be denied.
cited
Cited "see"
Mahan v. Tash
See Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Authority, 770 F.2d 676, 679 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dale E. LANEAR, Appellant, v. SAFEWAY GROCERY, Appellee
See Smith v. Monsanto, 770 F.2d 719, 722 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986); Johnson v. Bunny Bread Co., 646 F.2d 1250, 1253-54 (8th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Ketnor v. Automatic Power, Inc.
See Munguia v. Chevron Co., U.S.A., 768 F.2d 649 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1272 , 89 L.Ed.2d 580 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnnie Leonard, Sr. v. Dixie Well Service & Supply, Inc.
See Munguia v. Chevron Co., U.S.A., 768 F.2d 649 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1272 , 89 L.Ed.2d 580 (1986). 21 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Henderson v. Anne Arundel County Board of Education
See, e.g., Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Auth., 770 F.2d 676 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Mateo
Willis v Zant, 489 US 1059 ; see also, Barber v Ponte, 772 F2d 982, 986 [1st Cir 1985], cert denied 475 US 1050 .) In Peters v Kiff ( 407 US 493, 503-504 ) the Supreme Court held that the exclusion of distinctive groups "deprives the jury of a perspective on human events that may have unsuspected importance in any case that may be presented.” It has been established that African-Americans, Hispanics, and women do constitute distinct and cognizable groups within the community.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henry Willis, III v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
See, e.g., Barber v. Ponte, 772 F.2d 982, 1000 (1st Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1272 , 89 L.Ed.2d 580 (1986); Davis v. Greer, 675 F.2d 141, 146 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 975 , 103 S.Ct. 310 , 74 L.Ed.2d 289 (1982); United States v. Potter, 552 F.2d 901, 905 (9th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Musto, 540 F.Supp. 346, 354-55 (D.N.J.1982), aff’d sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kovalevsky v. West Publishing Co.
Compare Smith v. Monsan *1386 to Chemical Co., 770 F.2d 719 , 722 n. 2 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986) with Hubbard, 330 N.W.2d at 442 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tillis
v.
Davis, Warden
v.
Davis, Warden
No. 85-6077.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.