green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.4 score
“the holding in dunn has been implicitly overruled by the supreme court in moran v. burbine .”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Craig Chestnut v. City of Lowell
But see Williams v. Butler, 746 F.2d 431, 443-44 (8th Cir.1984) (affirming district court decision to set aside § 1983 punitive damages award despite failure to object to punitive damages instruction at trial), on reh'g, 762 F.2d 73 (8th Cir.1985) (en banc), vacated on other grounds sub nom., City of Little Rock v. Williams, 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1508 , 89 L.Ed.2d 909 (1986), on remand, Williams v. Butler, 802 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1986) (en banc), vacated on other grounds sub nom., City of Little Rock v. Williams, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988), on remand Williams v. B…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rossi v. Standard Roofing Inc (Part I)
Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 763 F.2d 1482, 1489 (3d Cir. 1985) (citations omitted), vacated on other grounds, Ford Motor Co. v. Tunis Brothers Co. Inc., 475 U.S. 1105 22 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Arabzadegan v. State
(6×)
See Lucas, 791 S.W.2d at 47 (citing Holloway v. State, 691 S.W.2d 608 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), rev’d 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1508 , 89 L.Ed.2d 908 (1986); Dunn v. State, 696 S.W.2d 561 (Tex.Crim.App.1985)).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Daley
See Tunis Brothers Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 763 F.2d 1482, 1501 (3d Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds, 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1509 , 89 L.Ed.2d 909 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Cobb v. State
(4×)
See Holloway v. Texas, 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1508 , 89 L.Ed.2d 908 (1986); Holloway, 780 S.W.2d at 788 .
discussed
Cited "see"
J.F. Feeser, Inc., v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.
See Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp., 693 F.2d 870, 887 (9th Cir.1982) ("the Supreme Court has recognized that the price discrimination that results where buyers seek competitive advantage from sellers encourages the aims of the Sherman Act, a respect in which the Sherman Act is inconsistent with the aims of the Robinson-Patman Act ... while appellants point to injury to their particular business, they do not make the necessary showing of a substantially adverse effect on competition in the record market in general" to sustain a Sherman Act claim). 91 In Tunis Brothers Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
Holloway v. State
(2×)
See Holloway v. Texas, 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1508 , 89 L.Ed.2d 908 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Crane & Shovel Sales Corp. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
See Ford Motor Company v. Tunis Brothers Co., Inc., 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1509 , 89 L.Ed.2d 909 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Crane & Shovel Sales Corporation v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
See Ford Motor Company v. Tunis Brothers Co., Inc., 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1509 , 89 L.Ed.2d 909 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holloway
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 84-6677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1986.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (2)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Michigan v. Jackson, ante, p. 625, and Moran v. Burbine, ante, p. 412.