green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mullins v. Garthwait
not warrant abstention where plaintiff has properly invoked the diversity jurisdiction of the federal district court.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
HMK Corp. v. Walsey
the general federal rule, which provides that the statute of limitations begins to run when a plaintiff knows or should know of the injury, applies in civil rico cases
cited
Cited "see"
Snarr v. United States
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 (1986); United States v. Green, 742 F.2d 609, 612 (11th Cir. 1984).
cited
Cited "see"
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytle
See, cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 e.g., TEx.R.Crv.Evm. 503(d), 504(d), 508(c), L.Ed.2d 916 (1986); Woods & Hair, Crimi- 509(d)-(e), 510(d), 511.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melissa Herrera
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.1986) (finding that a party who “offer[s] only a bare listing of alleged [errors], without citing supporting authorities or references to the record” abandons those claims on appeal), *754 cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW, Inc.
(2×)
See Gomez, 255 F.3d at 1131-1132 ; de la Jara, 973 F.2d at 749-750 ; see generally Clady v. Los Angeles County, 770 F.2d 1421, 1433-1434 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that inadvertence is "only one factor to be considered" in determining whether a waiver occurred), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harrelson v. United States
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 292 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986), (holding that an attorney may reveal otherwise privileged communications from his client to defend himself against charges of improper conduct without violating either the ethical rules of confidentiality or the attorney-client privilege); and Laughner v. United States, 373 F.2d 326, 327 (5th Cir.1967), (holding that a Section 2255 movant waived the attorney-client privilege by alleging that his former counsel had failed to adequately represent him at his arraig…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Payne
In other words, “it is not necessary to have any touching of any part of the body to violate § 53-21; the creation of a prohibited situation is sufficient.” State v. Perruccio, supra, 159-60 ; see State v. Tyler-Barcomb, 197 Conn. 666, 668-69 , 500 A.2d 1324 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S. Ct. 1518 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety Officers Ass'n v. Denton
(2×)
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 291 (5th Cir.) (citing Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986); Woods & Hair, Criminal Law Issues in Civil Litigation: Fifth Amendment Considerations for the Civil Practitioner, Management of Parallel Proceedings and Pitfalls of Money Laundering Statutes, 17th Annual Advanced Civil Trial Course U-1, U-1 (1994) (citing S.E.C. v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 628 F.2d 1368 , 1376 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 993 , 101 S.Ct. 529 , 66 L.Ed.2d 289 (1980)). *765 Denton's testimony might give …
discussed
Cited "see"
Randall Ex Rel. Estate of Randall v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.) (holding that claims made "without citing supporting authorities or references to the record" are considered abandoned on appeal), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986); Kemlon Prods. and Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
De Conway v. Lopez
See Bergeron v. ___ ________ Estate of Loeb, 777 F.2d 792, 800 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, ______________ _____ ______ 475 U.S. 1109 (1986); Construction Aggregates Corp. v. Rivera de _____________________________ _________ Vicenty, 573 F.2d 86, 91 (1st Cir. 1978). _______ We turn, then, to the second roadway to Burford _______ abstention: when federal review will disrupt "state efforts to establish a coherent policy with respect to a matter of substantial public concern." NOPSI, 491 U.S. at 361 (quoting _____ Colorado River, 424 U.S. at 814 ).
cited
Cited "see"
De Conway v. Lopez
See Bergeron v. Estate of Loeb, 777 F.2d 792, 800 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 (1986); Construction Aggregates Corp. v. Rivera de Vicenty, 573 F.2d 86, 91 (1st Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carmen Fragoso, A/K/A Carmen Fragoso De Conway v. Dr. Maria A. Lopez
See Bergeron v. Estate of Loeb, 777 F.2d 792, 800 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1517 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986); Construction Aggregates Corp. v. Rivera de Vicenty, 573 F.2d 86, 91 (1st Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joshi v. Nair
See Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc., 338 Pa.Super. 458, 467 , 487 A.2d 1372, 1373 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1517 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986) (in which we observed that res judicata bars the relitigation of issues previously raised as well as arguments which might have been raised).
discussed
Cited "see"
South Ottumwa Bancshares, Inc. v. First Interstate of Iowa, Inc.
See Sutherland v. Kaonohi Ohana, Ltd., 776 F.2d 1425, 1427-28 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1517 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986) (because corporation was organized only to sell its only asset, sale was in ordinary course of business).
cited
Cited "see"
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co.
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 293 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Joseph Masat
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perkins v. TSG. INC.
See, Noetzel v. Glascow, Inc., 338 Pa.Super. 458, 469 , 487 A.2d 1372, 1377 (1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1517 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986) (notice must “be reasonably calculated to inform interested parties of the pending action ... ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.) (party abandoned claims on appeal by failing to adequately brief issues, including a failure to provide references to the record), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Earl A. Brown, Jr. And Betty Galt Brown v. United States of America, Earl A. Brown, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Earl A. Brown v. United States of America, Earl A. Brown, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Ellen Augusta Brown v. United States of America, Susan Brown Barry, Guardian of Brice Galt Barry v. United States of America, Susan Brown Barry, Guardian of Andrew Earl Barry v. United States of America, Susan Brown Barry v. United States
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.) (party abandoned claims on appeal by failing to adequately brief issues, including a failure to provide references to the record), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986)
discussed
Cited "see"
McCool v. Strata Oil Co.
(2×)
See Bowling v. Founders Title Co., 773 F.2d 1175, 1178 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986); Compton v. Ide, 732 F.2d 1429 , 1433 (9th Cir.1984); Alexander v. Perkin Elmer Corp., 729 F.2d 576, 577 (8th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
L.K. Comstock & Company, Inc. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.
(2×)
See Clady v. County of Los Angeles, 770 F.2d 1421, 1427 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986). 30 V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lenell Geter v. James Fortenberry
See HECI Exploration Co., Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan v. Holloway (In re HECI Exploration Co.), 862 F.2d 513, 525 (5th Cir.1988) (citing United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.
(2×)
See Clady v. County of Los Angeles, 770 F.2d 1421, 1427 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kington
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 294 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ocean Energy Ii, Inc., and Coteau Services, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986); Netto v. National R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Francisco Villanueva v. Cna Insurance Companies, Intervenor-Appellee, Shell Offshore, Inc.
See Estiverne v. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n, 863 F.2d 371 , 374 n. 1 (5th Cir.1989) (citing United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Finley Associates, Inc. v. Sea & Pines Consolidated Corp.
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986) (prima facie evidence found that defendant conveyed property to attorney in scheme to defraud creditors); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 731 F.2d 1032, 1039 (2d Cir.1984) (must present pri-ma facie evidence to show reasonable basis to suspect fraud intended by communication between attorney and client); United States v. Zolp, 659 F.Supp. 692, 715 (D.N.J. 1987) (prima facie evidence required); Hercules, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 434 F.Supp. 136, 155 (D.Del.1977) (s…
discussed
Cited "see"
David Netto v. Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation)
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986) (party abandoned claim on appeal by failing to brief issues adequately); see also 16 Wright, Miller, Cooper & Gressman, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 3974 at 421 n. 1 (1985 and Supp. 1988) (waiver of arguments inadequately briefed).
cited
Cited "see"
Nicolas Estiverne v. Louisiana State Bar Association
See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 *375 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986) (party abandoned claim by failing to brief issue adequately). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Zola v. Gordon
(2×)
See Cullen v. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 698, 703-04, 724-25 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 3266 , 97 L.Ed.2d 764 (1987); accord Bowling v. Founders Title Co., 773 F.2d 1175, 1178 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986); Compton v. Ide, 732 F.2d 1429, 1433 (9th Cir.1984); see also Bankers Trust Co. v. Feldesman, 648 F.Supp. 17, 36 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eddie Lee Graham v. Milky Way Barge, Inc., and Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Defendants-Appellees v. Land and Offshore Services, Inc., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellants v. American Fidelity Ins. Co., Third Party Cross-Appellee and Southern American Insurance Co., Third Party Cross
This Circuit has held: 86 Since DOHSA is a wrongful death statute which, whether through inadvertance or design, does not address survival of action, it is entirely appropriate that the courts should fill what would otherwise be a legislative void by allowing general maritime law survival action based on Moragne 4 to supplement DOHSA. 87 Azzopardi v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 742 F.2d 890, 894 (5th Cir.1984) (citations omitted); see Casaceli v. Martech International, Inc., 774 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1985) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. Milky Way Barge, Inc.
Azzopardi v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 742 F.2d 890, 894 (5th Cir.1984) (citations omitted); see Casaceli v. Martech International, Inc., 774 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1985) ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cleghorn v. Herrington
See Clady v. County of Los Angeles, 770 F.2d 1421, 1431 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
43 Fair empl.prac.cas. 613, 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,957 William Cleghorn George Lane Erwin Dale Waler Furl Porter Eddy Moore Harold Maesaka John Fletcher Glen Betts Carlos Lujan Ira Matlock J. Wakeman v. John S. Herrington, Secretary, United States Department of Energy Herman E. Roser, Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs, United States Department of Energy Ralph E. Caudle, Director of Safeguards and Security Defense Programs, United States Department of Energy Wackenhut Services, Inc.
See Clady v. County of Los Angeles, 770 F.2d 1421, 1431 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. Milky Way Barge, Inc.
Azzopardi v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 742 F.2d 890, 894 (5th Cir.1984) (citations omitted); see Casaceli v. Martech International, Inc., 774 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1985) ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Eddie Lee Graham v. Milky Way Barge, Inc., and Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Defendants-Appellees v. Land and Offshore Services, Inc., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellants v. American Fidelity Ins. Co., Third Party Cross-Appellee, and Southern American Insurance Co., Third Party Cross
This Circuit has held: 82 Since DOHSA is a wrongful death statute which, whether through inadvertance or design, does not address survival of action, it is entirely appropriate that the courts should fill what would otherwise be a legislative void by allowing general maritime law survival action based on Moragne 4 to supplement DOHSA. 83 Azzopardi v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 742 F.2d 890, 894 (5th Cir.1984) (citations omitted); see Casaceli v. Martech International, Inc., 774 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1985) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Branham
See, e.g., State v. George, 37 Conn. App. 388, 390-92 , 656 A.2d 232 (1995) (leaving seventeen month old child unattended in apartment created situation risking injury to child’s health and life or limb); see also, e.g., State v. Tyler-Barcomb, 197 Conn. 666, 668-69 , 500 A.2d 1324 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S. Ct. 1518 , 89 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Morales
The defendant did not argue at the suppression hearing that he had an expectation of privacy in the hallway of the apartment building (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; see, e.g., People v Vasquez, 66 NY2d 968, 969 , cert denied 475 US 1109 ; People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011, 1012-1013 ; People v Cea, 237 AD2d 617, 618 ; People v Alexander, 226 AD2d 548, 549 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Luddy, No. Cr. 96 090033 (Oct. 31, 1997)
See, e.g., State v. Tyler-Barcomb, 197 Conn. 666 , 668-69 , 500 A.2d 1324 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986) (morals likely to be impaired where mother fails to prevent boyfriend's sexual abuse of her twelve year old child and where she knowingly had sexual intercourse with boyfriend in presence of child); State v. Erzen, 29 Conn. App. 591 , 599 , 617 A.2d 177 (1992) (exposing oneself to a child is an act likely to impair the morals of that child).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calhoun
See, e.g., United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287,293 (5th Cir.1986) cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986); Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGraw, 194 W.Va. 788 , 461 S.E.2d 850 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shadwick v. Butler National Corp.
See Colorado River, 424 U.S. at 819 , 96 S.Ct. at 1247 (“the concern ... is with avoiding the generation of additional litigation through permitting inconsistent dispositions of property.”); see also Bergeron v. Estate of Loeb, 777 F.2d 792, 799 (1st Cir.1985) (this factor “has no application to a case in a federal court based upon diversity of citizenship, wherein the plaintiff seeks merely an adjudication of his right or his interest as a basis of a claim against a fund in the possession of a state court.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1517 , 89 L.Ed.2d 915 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lionel Singleton, Sr. v. Guangzhou Ocean Shipping Company, Guangzhou Ocean Shipping Company v. Cooper/t. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee
See also Casaceli v. Martech International, Inc., 774 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986). 20 The district court found that the defective unloading procedure adopted by CTS created the dangerous condition that in turn caused Singleton's injury.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Singleton v. Guangzhou Ocean Shipping Co.
See also Casaceli v. Martech International, Inc., 774 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1516 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Riggs National Bank v. Andrews (In Re Andrews)
Clark, 289 U.S. at 15 , 53 S.Ct. at 469-70 ; see also United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 292-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamant v. Sheldon L. Pollack Corp.
Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Division of Emerson Electric Co., 953 F.2d 1004, 1008 (5th Cir.1992); See also United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mclnerney, et al. v. Heneghan, et al.
Markham v. Allen, 326 U.S. 490, 494 (1946); see also Bergeron v. Estate of Loeb, 777 F.2d 792 , 795 n.3 (1st Cir. 1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1109 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Neal
Consequently, "once the government has made a prima facie showing that the attorney was retained to promote intended or continuing criminal activity, the privilege may not be asserted." Harrelson, 754 F.2d at 1167 ; see also United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 292 (5th Cir.) (The privilege ceases "when the lawyer becomes either the accomplice or the unwitting tool in a continuing or planned wrongful act."), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986). 28 The Defendants contend that because Vernon did not communicate to Duncan and Neal his conclusion that they were …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Neal
Consequently, “once the government has made a prima facie showing that the attorney was retained to promote intended or continuing criminal activity, the privilege may not be asserted.” Harrelson, 754 F.2d at 1167 ; see also United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 292 (5th Cir.) (The privilege ceases “when the lawyer becomes either the accomplice or the unwitting tool in a continuing or planned wrongful act.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hunt
See also United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986) (discussing the requisite prima facie showing in the context of a prosecution for bankruptcy fraud).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Mahony
v.
Chicago Transit Authority
v.
Chicago Transit Authority
No. 85-1363.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1) · E.D. Virginia (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.