Humphrey v. Comm. on Prof'l Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n, 475 U.S. 1114 (1986). · Go Syfert
Humphrey v. Comm. on Prof'l Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n, 475 U.S. 1114 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Barnes v. Clark Sand Co. (fladistctapp, 1998-10-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Barnes v. Clark Sand Co.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 , 659 n. * (Fla.1985), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1626 , 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986); Diamond v. E.R.
discussed Cited "see" Valencia v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texas v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1627 , 90 L.Ed.2d 175 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Conley v. Boyle Drug Co.
Fla. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 , 659 n. * (Fla. 1985), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1626 , 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986); Diamond v. E.R.
cited Cited "see" Timothy McElroy by His Legal Guardians, Thomas McElroy and Vivian McElroy v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a Foreign Corporation
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 458 So.2d 1136, 1138 (Fla.App.1984), aff'd, 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1626 , 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ex Parte: Julian Martinez
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 813 ; see e.g., Jackson v. State , 766 S.W.2d 504, 508 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985)(failure of trial counsel to advise appellant that judge should assess punishment amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel), modified on other grounds by Texas v. Jackson , 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1627 , 90 L.Ed.2d 175 (1986); Ex parte Felton , 815 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991)(failure to challenge a void prior conviction used to enhance punishment rendered counsel ineffective); May v. State , 660 S.W.2d 888, 889 (Tex.App.--Austin 1983), aff’d, 722 S.W.2d 699 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984)(h…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Carr v. Broward County, 541 So.2d 92, 95 (Fla.1989); see also Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657, 659-60 (Fla.1985) (recognizing that statutes of repose are a valid legislative means to restrict or limit causes of action in order to achieve certain public interests), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1626 , 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kush v. Lloyd
Fla. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1985) (receding from Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co., 392 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1980), and holding the twelve-year statute of repose in products liability actions constitutional even as applied to causes of action which did not accrue until after the period expired), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1626 , 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." University of Miami v. Bogorff
Fla. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1985) (receding from Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co., 392 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1980), and holding the twelve-year statute of repose in products liability actions constitutional even as applied to causes of action which did not accrue until after the period expired), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1626 , 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Humphrey, dba Humphrey & Haas
v.
Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Assn.
No. 85-1343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1986.
475 U.S. 1114
Blackmun, Jurisdiction, Set, White, Would.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Iowa dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Justice White, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.