green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Callahan v. State
some amount of nervousness and depression following one's arrest for murder, where the evidence of guilt is overwhelming, is normal and not grounds for holding an otherwise valid confession inadmissible.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwayne A. Washington
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward Pavlick v. Jimmy Mifflin
See United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 798-99 (7th Cir.1985) (upholding conviction of prisoner for aiding and abetting the murder of a prison guard where the defendant gave a knife — the murder weapon — to the inmate who killed the guard immediately prior to the incident), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); United States v. Ortega, 44 F.3d 505, 508 (7th Cir.1995) (“One who, knowing the criminal nature of another’s act, deliberately renders what he knows to be active aid in the carrying out of the act is ... an aider or abettor even if there is n…
discussed
Cited "see"
Spear v. Sowders
See United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790 , modified, 777 F.2d 345 (7th Cir.1985) (describing murders of inmates and guards in “the Control Unit of the federal penitentiary at Marion, Illinois-the maximum-security cell block in the nation’s maximum-security federal prison”), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); Gometz v. Henman, 807 F.2d 113 (7th Cir.1986) (describing the same murders as well as listing additional murders by members of the “Aryan Brotherhood” prison gang).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spear v. Sowders
See United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790 , modified, 777 F.2d 345 (7th Cir.1985) (describing murders of inmates and guards in "the Control Unit of the federal penitentiary at Marion, Illinois--the maximum-security cell block in the nation's maximum-security federal prison"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); Gometz v. Henman, 807 F.2d 113 (7th Cir.1986) (describing the same murders as well as listing additional murders by members of the "Aryan Brotherhood" prison gang).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Salazar
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986) (precluding *611 expert’s opinion that agent’s arrest procedure could reasonably have prompted defendant to act in self-defense); Braley v. State, 741 P.2d 1061, 1063-1064 (Wyo.1987) (rejecting psychiatric testimony regarding stress factors that could have reasonably prompted defendant’s exercise of deadly force in self-defense).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald L. Jordan v. D. Majurin
See United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 797 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 (1986); Holt v. Pitts, 619 F.2d 558, 560-61 (6th Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoskins
See United States v. Varraso, 21 MJ 129, 134 (CMA 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1645 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moses Otis Williams, A/K/A Chubby
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), reh’g denied, en banc, 772 F.2d 918 (11th Cir.Fla.1985), cer t. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986) (conviction for carrying a firearm during a felony sustained where firearm not produced at trial but experienced law enforcement officer familiar with weapons testified that alleged firearm was a firearm and circumstantial evidence of use of a firearm was also presented).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitaker v. United States
See id., citing Collins v. United States, 491 A.2d 480, 484 (D.C.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gotti
See, in addition to the cases cited above, United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 797 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); United States v. Garza, 664 *1013 F.2d 135 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982); United States v. Micklus, 581 F.2d 612 (7th Cir.1978); United States v. Taylor, 562 F.2d 1345 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 432 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 2958 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1977); Rigdon, supra. A moment’s reflection reveals the propriety, if not the necessity, of weighing those factors in determining…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985) (expert may be used if his testimony can offer something “beyond the understanding and experience of the average citizen”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); Burchfield, 719 F.2d at 357 (expert testimony admissible where it is “the kind that enlightens and informs lay persons without expertise in a specialized field”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John E. Chapman
See United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 994 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986) (finding that hearsay statements had circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness and were thus admissible under Rule 804(b)(5) largely because they were substantially corroborated by other evidence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cook v. State
(2×)
Accord United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlin, 698 F.2d 1133 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2431 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Byrd
See, e.g., United States v. Rouco, 765 F. 2d 983, 993-95 (11th Cir. 1985) (admitting hearsay statement of witness killed by defendant pursuant to federal residual hearsay exceptions), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct 1646 , 90 L.Ed. 2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlson, 547 F. 2d 1346, 1353-55 (8th Cir.1976) (admitting, pursuant to federal residual hearsay exception, hearsay statement of witness who refused to testify due to defendant's threats), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct 2174 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Byrd
See, e.g., United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 993-95 (11th Cir.1985) (admitting hearsay statement of witness killed by defendant pursuant to federal residual hearsay exceptions), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1353-55 (8th Cir.1976) (admitting, pursuant to federal residual hearsay exception, hearsay statement of witness who refused to testify due to defendant’s threats), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Edwards
See, e.g., United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 (1986); United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784, 788 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul
Evid. 702; see also United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir. 1985) (arguing that counsel may use an expert if the expert’s 7 testimony can offer something “beyond the understanding and experience of the average citizen”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 (1986); United States v. Burchfield, 719 F.2d 356 (11th Cir. 1983) (explaining that expert testimony is admissible where it is “the kind that enlightens and informs lay persons without expertise in a specialized field”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul
Properly qualified expert witnesses may testify regarding their specialized knowledge in a given field if it “would assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702; see also United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983, 995 (11th Cir.1985) (arguing that counsel may use an expert if the expert’s testimony can offer something “beyond the understanding and experience of the average citizen”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); United States v. Burchfield, 719 F.2d 356 (11th Cir.1983) (explaining that expert…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dupre
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 802 (7th Cir.1985) ("[P]rojecting lost future earnings has no place in criminal sentencing if the amount or present value of those earnings is in dispute."), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); United States v. Bengimina, 699 F.Supp. 214, 218-19 (W.D.Mo.1988) (refusing to allow "excessive satellite litigation" to evaluate worth of bankrupt corporation because of complicated issues of proof).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Runck v. State
See also United States v. Glasgow, 790 F.2d 446 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); United States v. Wilson, 719 F.2d 1491 , 1495 n. 1 (10th Cir.1983); Lublin v. Johnson, 628 F.Supp. 1496 (D.Ct.E.D.N.Y.1986); Dorsey v. State, 490 N.E.2d 260 (Ind.1986); State v. Wade, 105 Nev. 206 , 772 P.2d 1291 (1989); People v. Reilly, 136 A.D.2d 355 , 527 N.Y.S.2d 234 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose Santillanes-Bustillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 344 (1970); see also United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 794 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sadowski v. McCormick
See, e.g., United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 796 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986) (other crimes evidence admitted to rebut defense of self-defense); accord, United States v. Hunter, 672 F.2d 815 (10th Cir.1982) (other crimes evidence properly admitted to rebut defense of duress).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Algienon Tanner
See, e.g., United States v. Glasgow, 790 F.2d 446, 450 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986) (period from filing of writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum to arraignment less than a month later was prompt); United States v. Lehman, 756 F.2d 725, 727 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 994 , 106 S.Ct. 406 , 88 L.Ed.2d 357 (1985) (government’s two-month delay between court’s mandate for retrial and defendant’s initial appearance not prompt, but not violation of sixth amendment right to speedy trial); United States v. Anderton, 752 F.2d 1005, 100…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Anthony Jamison
See United States v. Best, 573 F.2d 1095, 1101 (9th Cir.1978); see also United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 799 (7th Cir.1985) (“judges have no authority to add to the criminal penalties provided in federal statutes”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Magouirk
See also, U.S. v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1646 , 90 L.Ed.2d 190 (1986); U.S. v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 269 (1984); U.S. v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bradley Ernest Bercier
See, e.g., United States v. Webb, 533 F.2d 391, 395 (8th Cir.1976); see also United *920 States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 794-95 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986); cf. United States v. Rinchack, 820 F.2d 1557, 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (application for psychiatric expert filed 30 minutes before competency hearing).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cade
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1564.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.