green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1997 ·
…interest of a proposed intervenor must be greater than the interest sufficient to satisfy the standing requirement
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
County of St. Louis v. Thomas
(2×)
But cf., United States v. 36.96 Acres of Land, 754 F.2d 855, 859 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, Save the Dunes Council, Inc. v. United States, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986). .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Transamerica Insurance Company v. South
(2×)
interest of a proposed intervenor must be greater than the interest sufficient to satisfy the standing requirement
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rogers by and Through Standley v. Retrum
he scope of the risk created by the negligence of the original actor may include the foreseeable negligent or criminal conduct of others.
cited
Cited "see"
Reyes v. North Texas Tollway Authority
See Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital District, 778 F.2d 1052, 1057 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Whitner
(3×)
See United States v. Watkins, 21 MJ 224, 227 (CMA), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Builders Ass'n of Greater Chicago v. City of Chicago
(2×)
See Save the Dunes Council, Inc. v. United States, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986) ("interest of a proposed intervenor (under Rule 23(a)(2)) must be greater than the interest sufficient to satisfy the standing requirement”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tellez v. Saban
(2×)
See Rossell v. Volkswagen of Am., 147 Ariz. 160, 169 , 709 P.2d 517, 526 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986) (scope of risk due to original actor’s negligence may include foreseeable negligent or criminal acts of others); Central Alarm of Tucson v. Ganem, 116 Ariz. 74, 77 , 567 P.2d 1203, 1206 (App.1977) (intervening burglary “within the ambit of risk” created by original actor’s negligence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. City of Nederland
See Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital District, 778 F.2d 1052, 1056 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986); Kaplan v. Clear Lake City Water Authority, 794 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir.1986); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 657 , 86 S.Ct. 1717, 1727 , 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cynthia Anne Delgado, Ex Ux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See Rossell v. Volkswagen of America, 709 P.2d 517, 529 (Ariz.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 (1986). 4 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hebert
(2×)
See United States v. Watkins, 21 MJ 224, 227 (CMA) (Cox, J.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rhea
See United States v. Watkins, 21 MJ 224, 227 (CMA), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct.1956, 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orme School v. Reeves
See abo Rossell v. Volkswagen of America, 147 Ariz. 160, 164-65 , 709 P.2d 517, 521-22 (1985) (risk/benefit analysis involved in deciding whether defendant used "reasonable care” is generally for jury), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986); Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board, 146 Ariz. 352, 357-58 , 706 P.2d 364, 369-70 (1985) (whether danger of injury was foreseeable is question of fact for jury); Smith v. Chapman, 115 Ariz. 211, 214 , 564 P.2d 900, 903 (1977) (whether negligence is proximate cause of injury or damage is generally a question for the jury).
cited
Cited "see"
Terrestrial Systems, Inc. v. Fenstemaker
See Basch v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 777 F.2d 165 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bender
(2×)
See United States v. Watkins, 21 M.J. 224 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986) (evidence of motive is relevant to show the doing of an act by a person as an outlet for that motive); Myers, Uncharged Misconduct in Child Abuse Litigation, 1988 Utah L.Rev. 479, 503-07 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marks
See United States v. Watkins, 21 MJ 224, 227 (CMA), cert. de nied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct.1956, 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rose
(2×)
See United States v. Watkins, 21 MJ 224, 227 (CMA), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986); see generally II Wigmore, supra § 265.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills
See Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital, 778 F.2d 1052, 1056-58 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986) 21 ; Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 479-83 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905, 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 (1986) (substantive due process). 22 The United States Supreme Court as well as courts in this circuit have applied the legislative model of equal protection review of specific applications of zoning laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brennan v. Stewart
See Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital Dist., 778 F.2d 1052 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986) 12 See Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 166 , 88 S.Ct. 1444, 1456 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968) (Black, J., concurring) 13 Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 325 , 58 S.Ct. 149, 152 , 82 L.Ed. 288 (1937) 14 E.g., United States v. Salerno, --- U.S. ----, ----, 107 S.Ct. 2095, 2101 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987) (law permitting pre-trial detention based on the accused's dangerousness does not violate "substantive" due process under Fifth Amendment) 15 E.g…
cited
Cited "see"
Brennan v. Stewart
See Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital Dist., 778 F.2d 1052 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986). .
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Marsh
See United States v. 36.96 Acres of Land, 754 F.2d 855, 858-59 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Marsh
See United States v. 36.96 Acres of Land, 754 F.2d 855, 858-59 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. 36.46 Acres of Upland
See United States v. 36.96 Acres of Land, 754 F.2d 855, 858 (7th Cir.1985), cert. den., Save the Dunes Council, Inc. v. United States, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tallman v. City of Hurricane
(2×)
See 57A Am.Jur.2d Negligence § 185 (1989); see also Rossell v. Volkswagen of Am., 147 Ariz. 160 , 709 P.2d 517, 523 (1985) (holding “rule in negligence cases shall continue to be that evidence of industry custom and practice is generally admissible as evidence relevant to whether defendant’s conduct was reasonable under the circumstances”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986). ¶21 In determining the appropriate standard of conduct, the Restatement permits courts to adopt a standard from legislative enactments or administrative regulations which do not t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City of New York
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. 36.96 Acres of Land, 754 F.2d 855, 859 (7th Cir.1985) (noting the “qualitative difference between the ‘interest’ which is sufficient to bring an action [under a statute] and the ‘direct, significant, legally protectable interest required to intervene’ ”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sepulveda
(2×)
Compare United States v. Gregory, 31 M.J. 236, 238 (C.M.A.1990) (each unauthorized use of a military telephone could have been charged separately) (citing United States v. Jobes, 20 M.J. 506, 513 (A.F.C.M.R.1985), pet. denied, 21 M.J. 102 (C.M.A.1985)) and United States v. Watkins, 21 M.J. 224 (C.M.A.1986) (assault consummated by battery separate from rape when acts of choking and striking victim’s face did not constitute the actual force used to accomplish the rape), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986) and United States v. Burney, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 71 , 44 C.M.R…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. McCotter
See, e.g., Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital District, 778 F.2d 1052 *973 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986); Skerrell by and through Wooden v. City of Longview, 683 F.Supp. 1108, 1116 (E.D.Tex.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. Petersen
(2×)
Keeton, The Law of Torts § 53 at 356 (5th ed. 1984)); see also Rossell v. Volkswagen of America, 147 Ariz. 160, 164-66 , 709 P.2d 517, 521-23 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986) (No duty issue arises in a passenger’s case against an auto manufacturer: “In determining what is reasonable care for manufacturers, the plaintiff need only prove the defendant’s conduct presented a foreseeable, unreasonable risk of harm.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bruce A. Coane v. Ferrara Pan Candy Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Three Brothers Bakery, Inc., Third-Party
A failure to provide discovery need not be willful in order to trigger Rule 37(d) sanctions. “[I]n view of the possibility of light sanctions, even a negligent failure should come within Rule 37(d).” Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, Advisory Committee Notes to 1970 Amendment; see also Basch v. Westinghouse Electric Cory., 777 F.2d 165 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills
See Shelton v. City Of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 484 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 (1986); See also Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital, 778 F.2d 1052, 1060-61 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986). (2).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sargent County Bank v. Wentworth
(2×)
See also Fargo Women’s Health Organization v. Larson, 381 N.W.2d 176 (N.D.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Evans
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Watkins, 21 M.J. 224 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1956 , 90 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986); 1 United States v. Seymore, 19 M.J. 608 (A.C.M.R.1984); United States v. Gann, 732 F.2d 714, 725 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1034 , 105 S.Ct. 505 , 83 L.Ed.2d 397 (1984); United States v. Steele, 727 F.2d 580 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1209 , 104 S.Ct. 2396 , 81 L.Ed.2d 353 (1984); United States v. Slocum, 708 F.2d 587, 598 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Escalante, 637 F.2d 1197, 1202-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 856 , 101 S.Ct. 154 , 66 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dr. Kenneth Levi v. University of Texas at San Antonio
Co. v. Ward, 470 U.S. 869, 881 , 105 S.Ct. 1676, 1683 , 84 L.Ed.2d 751 (1985); see also Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital, 778 F.2d 1052, 1056, 1061 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watkins
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-6656.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2) · Court of Appeals of Arizona (1)
Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari denied.