green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…due process does not require that an informant's identity be revealed to an inmate.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Figueroa v. Vose
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
due process does not require that an informant's identity be revealed to an inmate.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Figueroa v. Vose
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
due process does not require that an informant's identity be revealed to an inmate.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bins
(2×)
See United States v. Hunter, 21 MJ 240, 242 (CMA) (‘“Proof of bias is almost always relevant because the jury, as finder of fact and weigher of credibility, has historically been entitled to assess all evidence which might bear on the accuracy and truth of a witness’ testimony.’ [Citation omitted.]”), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S. Ct. 2250 , 90 L.Ed.2d 696 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orlandis Bolden v. Darryl L. Winkelman
Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia, 111 S.Ct. 2439, 2447-48 (1991) ("Once retroactive application is chosen for any assertedly new rule, it is chosen for all others who might seek its prospective application."); see also Harper v. Virginia Dep't of Taxation, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 2517 (1993) ("When this Court applies a rule of federal law to the parties before it, that rule is the controlling interpretation of federal law and must be given full retroactive effect in all cases still open on direct review and as to all events, regardless of whether such events predate or postdate our announcement of the r…
discussed
Cited "see"
Nellis v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
See Taylor v. Home Insurance Co., 777 F.2d 849, 856-57 (4th Cir.1985) (approving district court’s submission of “continuing violation” question to the jury), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Strickland v. MICA Information Systems
See Herold v. Hajoca, 864 F.2d at 319 (citing Taylor v. Home Insurance Company, 777 F.2d 849, 854 (4th Cir.1985), cert. den. 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Butts v. Bowen
Accord United States v. Kimberlin, 776 F.2d 1344, 1346 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Rucker v. Johnson
See Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1296 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986); Harris v. MacDonald, 555 F.Supp. 137, 139 (N.D.Ill. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reed v. Brae Railcar Management, Inc.
See United States v. Kimberlin, 776 F.2d 1344, 1346 (7th Cir.1985) ("A court generally applies the law governing at the time of its decision....), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rose
(2×)
See United States v. Hunter, 21 MJ 240 , 242 n.4 (CMA), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2250 , 90 L.Ed.2d 696 (1986); United States v. Sermons, 14 MJ 350 (CMA 1982); United States v. Campbell, 13 USCMA 531, 534 , 33 CMR 63, 66 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Earl Quarles, Cross-Appellees v. Oxford Municipal Separate School District, Cross
See Frazier v. Board of Trustees, 765 F.2d 1278, 1292 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2252 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerardo v. NJ State Parole Bd.
See Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F. 2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir.1985), cert. den. 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed. 2d 697 (1986); Dawson v. Smith, 719 F. 2d 896, 899 (7th Cir.1983); Kyle v. Hanberry, 677 F. 2d 1386, 1390 (11th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James L. Webb v. Ron Anderson, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
Cf. Bourgeois v. Murphy, 119 Idaho 611 , 809 P.2d 472, 482 (1991) ("when there is no documentation of the chain of custody to show that that which was analyzed by the laboratory came from the inmate in question, there is no test from a legal standpoint”); Sherer v. State, 668 So.2d 174, 174 (Ala.Crim.App.1995); Byerly v. Ashley, 825 S.W.2d 286, 288 (Ky.App.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 934 , 113 S.Ct. 364 , 121 L.Ed.2d 277 (1992); see also Cato v. Rushen, 824 F.2d 703, 705 (9th Cir.1987) (“there must be some indicia of reliability of the information that forms the basis for prison discipli…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Webb, James v. Anderson, Ron
App. 1995); Byerly v. Ashley, 825 S.W.2d 286, 288 (Ky. App. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 934 , 113 S. Ct. 364 (1992); see also Cato v. Rushen, 824 F.2d 703, 705 (9th Cir. 1987) ("there must be some indicia of reliability of the information that forms the basis for prison disciplinary actions"), citing, inter alia, Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1295 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S. Ct. 2251 (1986); accord, Viens, supra, 871 F.2d at 1335 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sepulveda v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
See, also, Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S. Ct. 2251 , 90 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wade v. Farley
See also Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lynch v. NEBRASKA DEPT. OF CORR. SERVICES
See, also, Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986); Kyle v. Hanberry, 677 F.2d 1386 (11th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lynch v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
See, also, Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S. Ct. 2251 , 90 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Farley
See also Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ping v. McBride
See also Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clarence D. Cooper v. Michael P. Lane, Michael O'leary, Salvador Godinez, Edward Lyles, Kenneth Morgan, and Daniel Scott
He points out that at a disciplinary hearing an inmate is entitled “to call witnesses ... in his defense when permitting him to do so will not be unduly hazardous to institutional safety or correctional goals.” Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 566 , 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2979 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); see also Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986); Grandison v. Cuyler, 774 F.2d 598, 604 (3d Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Carlos Colon, Cross-Appellant v. Lieutenant Bruce Schneider, Cross-Appellee
See also Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. State
See also Mendoza v. Miller , 779 F.2d 1287 , 1296-98 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986); Harris v. MacDonald , 555 F. Supp. 137 , 140 (N.D.Ill. 1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Carter v. Duckworth
See also Mendoza v. Miller, 779 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 2251 , 90 L.Ed.2d 697 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartsel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1749.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1986.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.