Roberts v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 477 U.S. 901 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Roberts v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 477 U.S. 901 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
274 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 59 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thompson v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi THREE JUDGE PANEL: REEVES, GRAVES, JORDAN (mssd, 2021-08-18) · Strongest negative: Peter TISCHMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. ITT/SHERATON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (ca2, 1998-06-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Peter TISCHMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. ITT/SHERATON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Fort Halifax, 482 U.S. at 7 n. 5, 107 S.Ct. at 2215 n. 5 ("Section 1002(1)(B) has been construed to include severance benefits paid out of general assets, as well as out of a trust fund.”)(citing, inter alia, Gilbert v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901, 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986)); id. at 17 , 107 S.Ct. 2211 482 U.S. at 16-18 , 107 S.Ct. at 2220 (noting that "cases hold[ing] that a plan that pays severance benefits out of general assets is an ERISA plan” are "completely consistent with our analysis”).
discussed Cited "but see" Richmond v. American Systems Corp.
E.D. Va. · 1992 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 327 (2nd Cir.1985) (traditional state police power preempted unless it affects benefit plans in a tenuous, remote, or peripheral manner), aff’d, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986). 13 .
discussed Cited "but see" Nechero v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
D.N.M. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
Id. at 12 , 107 S.Ct. at 2218; but see id. at 17-18, n. 10, 107 S.Ct. at 2221 n. 10 (lump sum severance benefits can amount to a “plan” when they are paid episodically as each employee leaves) (citing Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985), summarily aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2nd Cir. *379 1985), summarily aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986)).
cited Cited "see" Thompson v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi THREE JUDGE PANEL: REEVES, GRAVES, JORDAN
S.D. Miss. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haith, 618 F. Supp. at 413 (applying Section 5 to judicial elections), aff’d, 477 U.S. 901 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Kirkland v. SSL Americas, Inc.
M.D. Ala. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brooks, 477 U.S. at 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 .
cited Cited "see" McPherson v. Maryland Public Employees Council 67
D. Maryland · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Illingworth v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
D.N.J. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 325 (2d Cir.1985), aff’d sub nom, Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Fusco v. GE Government Services, Inc.
D. Maryland · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holland v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985), aff 'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Gilbert v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2nd Cir.1985), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Veilleux v. Atochem North America, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320 , 328-29 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348, 1354 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865 , 106 S.Ct. 183 , 88 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Veilleux v. Atochem North America
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 328-29 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348, 1354 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865 , 106 S.Ct. 183 , 88 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985).
cited Cited "see" Holt v. Tonawanda Coke Corp.
W.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 328 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Reichelt v. Emhart Corporation
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high
Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 325 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); accord Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140, 1145 (4th Cir.1985), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 947 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990); Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp. 754 F.2d 1499, 1503 (9th Cir.1985); see also Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 17-18 , 107 S.Ct. 2211, 2220-21 , 96 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987); Schw…
discussed Cited "see" Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high
Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 325 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); accord Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140, 1145 (4th Cir.1985), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 905 F.2d 943, 947 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 517 , 112 L.Ed.2d 529 (1990); Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp. 754 F.2d 1499, 1503 (9th Cir.1985); see also Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 17-18 , 107 S.Ct. 2211, 2220-21 , 96 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987); Schwa…
discussed Cited "see" Isaac v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America
E.D. Tenn. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Co., 643 F.Supp. 1229, 1233 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 822 F.2d 59 (6th Cir.1987); See Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 322 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901, 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Guisti v. General Electric Co.
N.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gilbert v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 765 F.2d 320 , 324-26 (2nd Cir.1985), aff'd without opinion, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); Schwartz v. Newsweek, Inc., 827 F.2d 879, 881 (2nd Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see" Brooks v. State Board of Elections (2×)
S.D. Ga. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haith v. Martin, 618 F.Supp. 410 (E.D.N.C.1985) (three-judge court), aff'd mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3268 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Kirksey v. Allain, 635 F.Supp. 347 (S.D.Miss.1986) (same). [7] The Supreme Court's summary affirmance of Haith v. Martin may well have decided this issue.
discussed Cited "see" Sandler v. New York News Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2d Cir.1985) (agreement to pay severance benefits constitutes welfare plan within meaning of ERISA), aff’d, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. Peyton (2×)
Wyo. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adcock, 822 F.2d at 626 n. 8, which lists cases requiring or not requiring unemployment for wage continuation benefit entitlement, and Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985), aff'd 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 , cert. denied 477 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 3271 , 91 L.Ed.2d 562 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" State, Department of Revenue v. Air Jamaica Ltd. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Department of Revenue v. Wardair Canada, Ltd., 455 So.2d 326 (Fla.1984), aff'd., 477 U.S. 1 , 106 S.Ct. 2369 , 91 L.Ed.2d 1 (1986), and Department of Revenue v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 455 So.2d 324 (Fla.1984), appeal dismissed, 477 U.S. 901, 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986).
cited Cited "see" William Mallory v. George C. Eyrich
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haith v. Martin, 618 F.Supp. 410 (E.D.N.C. 1985), aff'd without opinion, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3268 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986).
examined Cited "see" Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne (6×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
SCOTUS · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F. 2d 1140 (CA4 1985), summarily aff’d, 477 U. S. 901 (1986); Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F. 2d 320 (CA2 1985), summarily aff’d, 477 U. S. 901 (1986); Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp., 754 F. 2d 1499 (CA9 1985); 29 CFR § 2510.3-1 (a)(3) (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gibson v. AHF, LLC
E.D. Ky. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
Office, Inc., 395 F. Supp. 2d 290, 296 (M.D.N.C. 2005)); see also Fort Halifax Packing, 482 U.S. at 18 n.10 (noting that in another set of cases, an employer’s “commitment to pay severance benefits to employees as each person left employment” “created the need for an administrative scheme to pay these benefits on an ongoing basis”) (citing Holland v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 722 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir. 1985), aff’d, 477 U.S. 901 (1986); Gilbert v. Burlington Indus, Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2d Cir. 1985), aff’d, 477 U.S. 901 (1986)).
cited Cited "see, e.g." A.O. Smith Corp. v. Kansas Department of Human Resources
Kan. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140, 1146-48 (4th Cir. 1985), aff'd Brooks v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 477 U.S. 901 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Metz v. United Counties Bancorp
D.N.J. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 765 F.2d 320, 326-28 (2d Cir.1985), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986) (state law claim seeking to obtain severance pay provided by employee benefit plan preempted); Powell v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 780 F.2d 419, 421-22 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170 , 106 S.Ct. 2892 , 90 L.Ed.2d 980 (1986) (state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, and unfair trade practices arising out of denial of disability bene…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George W. Henglein, L.C. Albacker, R.B. Andrews, R.L. Appeldorn, R.H. Ashenbaugh, A.L. Austin, J.W. Bagosi, J.D. Balser, A. Barrasso, J.O. Bauer, E.E. Best, H.W. Bigleman, C.R. Blazier, J.P. Bressanelli, G.D. Brown, F.C. Buchholz, E.C. Calvin, R.R. Campbell, P.D. Castellano, J.L. Cerasi, E. Chapman, S. Christy, T.M. Costello, C.A. Dauka, A.J. Decosta, M.G. Degrande, A.S. Diccio, A.P. Dimarzio, C.J. Dimarzio, R.J. Dougherty, M. Druga, E.P. Erath, E.P. Fahnert, H. Farrington, M. Ferlaino, R.D. Feydo, E.R. Finger, J.N. Flara, N.E. Frederick, J.P. Frenn, R.E. Fronko, L.L. Gibbs, W.L. Gleason, L.E. Gordon, R.W. Gott, J.E. Grimm, P.E. Grubbs, E.R. Guerra, A.J. Gulutz, J.T. Haaf, J.D. Hamacher, Jr., P.J. Hannon, R.M. Hansen, M.I. Harpham, D.H. Heldman, J.K. Hile, R.S. Hogsett, R.T. Hopper, H.M. Howell, W.M. Hyams, J.M. Janke, C.L. Jobe, Jr., K.H. Johns, R.O. Johnson, Jr., E.T. Jones, R. Kao, D.P. Kerr, Jr., P.A. Keys, R.W. Knallay, E.E. Knapek, W.J. Kofalt, S.W. Kohler, T. Kominitsky, T.R. Krupa, P.R. Kullen, J.R. Kundick, W. Lake, D.F. Lavene, T.T. Lehmann, R.H. Lewis, R.A. Lippert, W.R. Livingston, J.H. Lutton, A.J. Lynn, D.B. McClain J.L. McKain P.F. McNicol E.L. Marsh, F.S. Matsukas, H.J. Mercer, A.R. Middleton, M. Mitrovich, M.A. Molchan, R.A. Montgomery, R.T. Morelli, A.N. Morrison, H. Mraunac, M.R. Muckian, C.W. Murray, Iii, C.J. Muers, L v. Nagle, D.A. Nobers, J.A. Nuzo, E. Ordich, W.H. Orr, T.H. Parsons, A.J. Pasko, Jr., H.S. Pease, Iii, G.J. Pescion, G v. Peterson, J.J. Popp, G.P. Porto, G. Postich, D.E. Powell, R.W. Prentice, J v. Presutti, W.C. Price, L.E. Raykovics, T.R. Reed, J.W. Reider, J.J. Rose, A.J. Rosepiller, C.S. Russell, K.E. Sanders, M.A. Sarver, P.K. Schake, J.W. Scholtz, A.H. Sheline, M.L. Sherry, F.R. Shuss, W.W. Simpson, A.E. Six, J.E. Smith, E.H. Spaziani, W.H. Stephens, C.D. Strosnider, J.F. Suffoletta, H.L. Taylor, K.E. Thomas, F.S. Thornberry, Jr., J.R. Tice, D.A. Townley, R. Trbovich, R.T. Turner, H.B. Van Fossen, R.R. Vlah, A. Vranes, S. Vranes, D.W. Ware, K.G. Wassman, Jr., G.T. Weekley, E.M. Werries, Jr., D.L. Westfall, J.A. Whithead, R.J. Whitten, C.K. Wildman, T. Williams, Jr., T.H. Wills, Jr., A.J. Yanni, L.H. Young, Jr., R.C. Young, H.F. Yute, W.I. Zazwirsky, in No. 91-3379 v. Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees, Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees, Plan for Maintaining Benefits for Salaried Employees in Parity With Benefits Granted to Union Represented Employees. George W. Henglein, L.C. Albacker, R.B. Andrews, R.L. Appeldorn, R.H. Ashenbaugh, A.L. Austin, J.W. Bagosi, J.D. Balser, A. Barrasso, J.O. Bauer, E.E. Best, H.W. Bigleman, C.R. Blazier, J.P. Bressanelli, G.D. Brown, F.C. Buchholz, E.C. Calvin, R.R. Campbell, P.D. Castellano, J.L. Cerasi, E. Chapman, S. Christy, T.M. Costello, C.A. Dauka, A.J. Decosta, M.G. Degrande, A.S. Diccio, A.P. Dimarzio, C.J. Dimarzio, R.J. Dougherty, M. Druga, E.P. Erath, E.P. Fahnert, H. Farrington, M. Ferlaino, R.D. Feydo, E.R. Finger, J.N. Flara, N.E. Frederick, J.P. Frenn, R.E. Fronko, L.L. Gibbs, W.L. Gleason, L.E. Gordon, R.W. Gott, J.E. Grimm, P.E. Grubbs, E.R. Guerra, A.J. Gulutz, J.T. Haaf, J.D. Hamacher, Jr., P.J. Hannon, R.M. Hansen, M.I. Harpham, D.H. Heldman, J.K. Hile, R.S. Hogsett, R.T. Hopper, H.M. Howell, W.M. Hyams, J.M. Janke, C.L. Jobe, Jr., K.H. Johns, R.O. Johnson, Jr., E.T. Jones, R. Kao, D.P. Kerr, Jr., P.A. Keys, R.W. Knallay, E.E. Knapek, W.J. Kofalt, S.W. Kohler, T. Kominitsky, T.R. Krupa, P.R. Kullen, J.R. Kundick, W. Lake, D.F. Lavene, T.T. Lehmann, R.H. Lewis, R.A. Lippert, W.R. Livingston, J.H. Lutton, A.J. Lynn, D.B. McClain J.L. McKain P.F. McNicol E.L. Marsh, F.S. Matsukas, H.J. Mercer, A.R. Middleton, M. Mitrovich, M.A. Molchan, R.A. Montgomery, R.T. Morelli, A.N. Morrison, H. Mraunac, M.R. Muckian, C.W. Murray, Iii, C.J. Muers, L v. Nagle, D.A. Nobers, J.A. Nuzo, E. Ordich, W.H. Orr, T.H. Parsons, A.J. Pasko, Jr., H.S. Pease, Iii, G.J. Pescion, G v. Peterson, J.J. Popp, G.P. Porto, G. Postich, D.E. Powell, R.W. Prentice, J v. Presutti, W.C. Price, L.E. Raykovics, T.R. Reed, J.W. Reider, J.J. Rose, A.J. Rosepiller, C.S. Russell, K.E. Sanders, M.A. Sarver, P.K. Schake, J.W. Scholtz, A.H. Sheline, M.L. Sherry, F.R. Shuss, W.W. Simpson, A.E. Six, J.E. Smith, E.H. Spaziani, W.H. Stephens, C.D. Strosnider, J.F. Suffoletta, H.L. Taylor, K.E. Thomas, F.S. Thornberry, Jr., J.R. Tice, D.A. Townley, R. Trbovich, R.T. Turner, H.B. Van Fossen, R.R. Vlah, A. Vranes, S. Vranes, D.W. Ware, K.G. Wassman, Jr., G.T. Weekley, E.M. Werries, Jr., D.L. Westfall, J.A. Whithead, R.J. Whitten, C.K. Wildman, T. Williams, Jr., T.H. Wills, Jr., A.J. Yanni, L.H. Young, Jr., R.C. Young, H.F. Yute, W.I. Zazwirsky v. Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees, Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees, Plan for Maintaining Benefits for Salaried Employees in Parity With Benefits Granted to Union Represented Employees Colt Industries Operating Corporation Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees, in No. 91-3413
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865 , 106 S.Ct. 183 , 88 L.Ed.2d 152 (1984); see also Gilbert v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2d Cir.1985) (unfunded severance pay policy is ERISA plan and therefore governed by federal, not state, law), aff'd without opinion, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); Holland v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985) (same facts and holding as Gilbert ), aff'd. without opinion, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Henglein v. Informal Plan for Plant Shutdown Benefits for Salaried Employees
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865 , 106 S.Ct. 183 , 88 L.Ed.2d 152 (1984); see also Gilbert v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 765 F.2d 320 (2d Cir.1985) (unfunded severance pay policy is ERISA plan and therefore governed by federal, not state, law), aff’d without opinion, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 558 (1986); Holland v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985) (same facts and holding as Gilbert), aff’d without opinion, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morishige v. Spencecliff Corp.
D. Haw. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Morash, 109 S.Ct. at 1673 (plans to pay employees severance benefits are employee welfare benefit plans within the meaning of ERISA) (citing Brooks v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985), summarily aff’d sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Overcash v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
N.C. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Holland v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 772 F. 2d 1140 , 1148 (4th Cir. 1985), aff’d mem., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed. 2d 559 , cert. denied, 477 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 3271 , 91 L.Ed. 2d 562 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bowman v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
N.D. Ohio · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Holland v. Burlington Industries, 772 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir.1985), affirmed mem. 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 , cert. denied, 477 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 3271 , 91 L.Ed.2d 562 (1986); Pabst Brewing Co. v. Anger, 784 F.2d 338 (8th Cir.1986) ( per curiam ); Blakeman v. Mead Containers, 779 F.2d 1146 (6th Cir.1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Perry v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have held, consistent with this interpretation, that “Congress used ‘relate to’ in its broadest sense.” Authier v. Ginsberg, 757 F.2d 796, 800 (6th Cir.) (citing Shaw, 463 U.S. at 98 , 103 S.Ct. at 2900 ), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 888 , 106 S.Ct. 208 , 88 L.Ed.2d 177 (1985); see also Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1140, 1147 (4th Cir.1985) (stating that § 1144(a) is a section of “unparallelled breadth”), aff'd, 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arnold v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Ill. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 559 , 106 S. Ct. 3267 ; Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. (11th Cir. 1985), 759 F.2d 1518 , 1521; Jung v. FMC Corp. (9th Cir. 1985), 755 F.2d 708, 714-15 ; see also Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc. (2d Cir. 1985), 765 F.2d 320 , 329, aff’d mem. (1986), 477 U.S. 901 , 91 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roberts, Commissioner of Labor of the State of New York
v.
Burlington Industries, Inc. and Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
No. 85-441; No. 85-460.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1986.
477 U.S. 901
Cited by 25 opinions  |  Published

Affirmed on appeals from C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 765 F. 2d 320.