green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Saani
See United States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327, 328 (D.C.Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thurk
See State v. McCrossen, 129 Wis. 2d 277 , 385 N.W.2d 161 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986); State v. Walstad, 119 Wis. 2d 483 , 351 N.W.2d 469 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven A. Mizell, Claude E. Moore, Jr., and Kennith D. Ware
See United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.) (noting that district court is "vested with wide discretion" in determining a restitution order), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Eicher
See Commonwealth v. Higgins, 346 Pa.Super. 238 , 242-243 n. 1, 499 A.2d 585 , 587-588 n. 1 (1985), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 149 , 93 L.Ed.2d 90 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Garrity
See State v. McCrossen, 129 Wis. 2d 277, 294 , 385 N.W.2d 161, 168 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986). 5 The lieutenant was unavailable to testify; his report was read into the record. 6 We are mindful of the statement in State v. Ruiz, 118 Wis. 2d 177, 194 , 347 N.W.2d 352, 360 (1984), that stressed the importance of the trial court's evaluation of the newly discovered evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Ryan
See United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Carter
See United States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C.Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morgan
Code Ann. § 17-25-322 (A) (2014) (“[I]n addition to any other sentence which it may impose, the court shall order the defendant make restitution_” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 769 (6th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986) (a restitution order is in the nature of a sentence, and the district court is vested with wide discretion in determining the appropriate sentence for a convicted defendant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gulledge
See S.C.Code Ann. § 17-25-322 (Supp.1996) (“in addition to any other sentence which it may impose, the court shall order the defendant make restitution ... ”); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-1530(D)(3) (Supp.1996) (“[t]he judge shall order restitution at every sentencing for a crime against person or property ... unless the court finds a substantial and compelling reason not to order restitution”); S.C.Code Ann. § 17-25-125 (1976); see also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986) (a restitution order is in the nature…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David M. Weber
Secs. 3663-64 , "does not dictate how restitution liability should be apportioned among multiple defendants"; however, "a sentencing court has wide discretion to fashion an appropriate sentence for an individual defendant." United States v. Harris, 7 F.3d 1537, 1540 (10th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.) ("A restitution order is in the nature of a sentence, and the district court is 'vested with wide discretion' in determining the appropriate sentence for a convicted defendant.") (quoting Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243 (1970)), cert. denied, 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billy Gene Harris
See also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.) (sentencing court must consider *1540 each individual defendant’s financial needs and resources in issuing a restitution order), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shea
See, e.g., United States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327, 328 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. denied Vortis v. United States, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986); United States v. Himler, 797 F.2d 156, 161 (3d Cir.1986) (listing decisions by other Circuits that require a preponderance of the evidence to demonstrate risk of flight).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Ogborne
(2×)
See also, Commonwealth v. Higgins, 346 Pa.Super. 238 , 499 A.2d 585 (1985), cert. denied in 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 149 , 93 L.Ed.2d 90 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald v. Cloud
See e.g., United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vortis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-7099.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.