green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.6 score
“if a motion falls within the scope of rule 59(e), and it is timely served within ten days after entry of judgment as that rule requires, then the court must consider it as a rule 59(e) motion for the purposes of fed.r.app.p. 4(a)(4), regardless of how it is styled.”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clarendon Ltd. v. Eddie W. Foster
if a motion falls within the scope of rule 59(e), and it is timely served within ten days after entry of judgment as that rule requires, then the court must consider it as a rule 59(e) motion for the purposes of fed.r.app.p. 4(a)(4), regardless of how it is styled.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Lewis
As well as Professor Boerner's argument, Lewis relies on this court's decision in State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 *306 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Pfeiffer
See Cola v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 681, 701 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Langstead
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 187 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986). ¶19 A conviction is valid on its face unless it shows constitutional infirmities without further elaboration.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. LANGSTEAD
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 187 , 713 P.2d 719 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986). ¶ 19 A conviction is valid on its face unless it shows constitutional infirmities without further elaboration.
cited
Cited "see"
Hai-Yin v. Tao
See Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D&G Boat Rentals,Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir. 1986) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dorenbos
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 188 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal v. Netherland
See Cola v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 681, 694 (1st Cir.1986) (“to require defendants to object to appellate tribunal errors prior to the appellate opinion is, in our view, to impose unreasonable demands of foresight”) (emphasis in. original), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Flores v. Johnson
See Neyland v. Blackburn, 785 F.2d 1283, 1289 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 352 (1986). 36 .
cited
Cited "see"
Campos v. Johnson
See Neyland v. Blackburn, 785 F.2d 1283, 1289 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 352 (1986). 46 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Detention of Aqui
See Young, 122 Wn.2d at 47 . 8 See State v. Mulcare, 189 Wash. 625, 628 , 66 P.2d 360 (1937). 9 See State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 180 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986). 10 See Young, 122 Wn.2d at 22 . 11 122 Wn.2d at 41 . 12 Young, 122 Wn.2d at 41 (citing Harris, 98 Wn.2d at 284 ). 13 RCW 10.77.220. 14 See State v. McGee, 122 Wn.2d 783, 787 , 864 P.2d 912 (1993). 15 The Legislature now directs that "during all court proceedings the person shall be detained in a secure facility.” RCW 71.09.060(3), as amended by Laws of 1995, ch. 216, § 6. 16 See generally RC…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ali v. Gomez
See Roberts v. Spaulding, 783 F.2d 867 , 869-70 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986). 6 We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ali's motion for reconsideration.
cited
Cited "see"
Richard C. Clement v. Michigan Department of Transportation
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 667 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Foster
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 185 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCraw
(2×)
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 180 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Lee Smith
See United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120, 1125 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blevio v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch, 387 U.S. 456, 465 , 87 S.Ct. 1776, 1782 , 18 L.Ed.2d 886 (1967); Ground Air Transfer, Inc. v. Westates Airlines, Inc., 899 F.2d 1269, 1275 (1st Cir.1990); see Cola v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 681 , 688 n. 5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986) (stating that the First Circuit was bound to apply a state appellate court’s statement of local law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blevio v. Aetna Ins. Co.
Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch, 387 U.S. 456 , ____________ _______________ 465 (1967); Ground Air Transfer, Inc. v. Westates Airlines, Inc., _________________________ _______________________ 899 F.2d 1269, 1275 (1st Cir. 1990); see Cola v. Reardon, 787 ___ ____ _______ -6- F.2d 681, 688 n.5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986) ____________ (stating that the First Circuit was bound to apply a state appellate court's statement of local law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne Morris Reeves, Jr. v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Dept. Of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986); see also Craig v. Lynaugh, 846 F.2d 11, 13 (5th Cir.1988) (if service of process has not occurred, and “[i]f a judgment has been entered, a Rule 59(e) motion, or its legal equivalent, filed within 10 days after the date of entry of judgment is timely even though it has not been served on the defendants”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. Dubois
See Cola v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 681 , 688 n.5 (1st ___ ____ _______ Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986); Tarrant v. Ponte, _____ ______ _______ _____ 751 F.2d 459, 464 (1st Cir. 1985). -13- 13 In fact, even the SJC acknowledged that the jury was not properly instructed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. Dubois
(2×)
See Cola v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 681 , 688 n. 5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986); Tarrant v. Ponte, 751 F.2d 459, 464 (1st Cir.1985). .
cited
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Oldham
See Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 669 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Dandy
See United States v. Krebs, 788 F.2d 1166, 1177 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 400 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986) (holding that prosecutor’s statement “I want to suggest to you that in this trial testimony she was telling the truth” did not constitute reversible error given the substantial evidence against the defendant and the trial court’s corrective measures to eliminate prejudice).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mail
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 182 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 (precluding challenges to the amount of time imposed when within the standard range), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Torres v. State
See Brown v. State, 464 So.2d 193, 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), afFd on other grounds, 487 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1986), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 352 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
James A. Latham, Marian E. Latham, Movant-Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 669 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Latham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 669 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillman v. Cook
(2×)
See Cola v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 681, 700-01 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986); United States v. Mosley, 786 F.2d 1330, 1335 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1121-22 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Parkhill, 775 F.2d 612, 615 (5th Cir.1985); United States v. Hayes, 775 F.2d 1279, 1282 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Benn
(2×)
See State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Ludwig Frost v. Thomas Lutz
See Roberts v. Spalding, 783 F.2d 867, 870 (9th Cir.) ("A prison inmate has no independent constitutional right to outside medical care additional and supplemental to medical care provided by staff within the institution."), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986). 8 Therefore, Frost fails to establish even the minimum requirements for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief, and the district court properly denied his motion. 9 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
John C. Bertrand v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, 784 F.2d 665 , 668-70 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Bertrand v. Sullivan
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, 784 F.2d 665 , 668–70 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marshall Independent School District v. United States Gypsum Co.
See Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 669-70 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986) (any motion filed within ten days of entry that calls into question correctness of judgment is functionally a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), whatever its label).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Cronan
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 667-68 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Juivonne Littlejohn v. John Hawley, Security Classification Committee Members
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lonnie Echols v. Joel T. Parker, State of Mississippi
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986); Willie v. Continental Oil Co., 784 F.2d 706 (5th Cir.1986) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maling
See United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120, 1125 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986); United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 526 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); United States v. Johnson, 575 F.2d 1347, 1356 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 407 , 99 S.Ct. 1213 , 59 L.Ed.2d 454 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
ca6 1990
See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mario David Marquez v. Samuel A. Lewis
See Roberts v. Spalding, 783 F.2d 867, 871 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986); McFarland v. Cassady, 779 F.2d 1426, 1428 (9th Cir.1986). 6 Marquez's mere placement into protective segregation did not violate his constitutional rights because he does not have a liberty interest in freedom from protective custody.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Justo Enrique Jay
See United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120, 1125 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986); United States v. Lurz, 666 F.2d 69, 78 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1005 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Midland National Bank v. Conlogue
See Metz v. United States, 788 F.2d 1528, 1534-36 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 400 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986) (holding claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, false light, and intrusion into seclusion were not independent of the alleged underlying misrepresentation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Banks
More recently, the Ninth Circuit concluded in United States v. Casey that a defendant’s lack of assets at the time of his conviction does not allow him to sidestep a forfeiture judgment in the amount of his criminal proceeds: “money judgments are appropriate under § 853, even in cases of insolvent defendants.” 444 F.3d at 1077 (emphasis added); see also United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120 , 1127 n.6 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986) (observing that under § 853, “the government need not have offered evidence that the forfeitable assets were still in existence at the time…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. Banks
More recently, the Ninth Circuit concluded in United States v. Casey that a defendant’s lack of assets at the time of his conviction does not allow him to *203 sidestep a forfeiture judgment in the amount of his criminal proceeds: “money-judgments are appropriate under § 853, even in cases of insolvent defendants.” 444 F.3d at 1077 (emphasis added); see also United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120 , 1127 n. 6 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986) (observing that under § 853, “the government need not have offered evidence that the forfeitable ass…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Watson
Compare Mail, 121 Wash.2d at 712 , 854 P.2d 1042 ("in order for a `procedural' appeal to be allowed under Ammons, it must be shown that the sentencing court had a duty to follow some specific procedure required by the SRA, and that the court failed to do so") with State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 183 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 ("[a]n appellant ... is not precluded from challenging on appeal the procedure by which a sentence within the standard range was imposed"), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Watson
Compare Mail, 121 Wn.2d at 712 (“in order for a ‘procedural’ appeal to be allowed under Ammons, it must be shown that the sentencing court had a duty to follow some specific procedure required by the SRA, and that the court failed to do so”) with State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 183 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 (“[a]n appellant... is not precluded from challenging on appeal the procedure by which a sentence within the standard range was imposed”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wadsworth
See, e.g., State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 180 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S. Ct. 398 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wadsworth
See, e.g., State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 180 , 713 P.2d 719 , 718 P.2d 796 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986); State v. Freitag, 127 Wash.2d 141, 144-45 , 896 P.2d 1254 , 905 P.2d 355 (1995). [57] See Geschwind, 121 Wash.2d at 841 , 854 P.2d 1061 . [58] Br. of Appellant at 16. [59] Id. at 16-19. [60] Id. at 16. [61] State v. Blilie, 132 Wash.2d 484, 489 , 939 P.2d 691 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fleischer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Id.; see also Williamson, 815 F.2d at 377 (quoting Metz v. United States, 788 F.2d 1528, 1534 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 400 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Schiff
See, e.g., Roberts v. Spalding, 783 F.2d 867, 874 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 352 (1986).
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
v.
Harcon Barge Co., Inc.
v.
Harcon Barge Co., Inc.
No. 85-2015.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1986.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.