green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
New Sensor Corp. v. CE DISTRIBUTION LLC
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.) (awarding attorney’s fees in part because plaintiff brought suit for coercive purpose of joining in defendants’ profits), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986); Diamond Supply Co. v. Prudential Paper Prods.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Graber v. City of New York
See Universal City Studios v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 79 (2d Cir.) (plaintiff must demonstrate that “the enrichment was at [its] expense, and that the circumstances dictate that, in equity and good conscience, the defendant should be required to turn over its money to the plaintiff’), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roma Construction v. Arusso
See Rand v. Anaconda Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturer's Nat'l Bank of Detroit, 759 F.2d 542, 545 (6th Cir. 1985); Abrams, supra, 3.3.6, at 147-52.
discussed
Cited "see"
Roma Construction v. Arusso
See ___ Rand v. Anaconda Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.), ____ ________________________ cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturer's Nat'l ____________ ______ ____________________ Bank of Detroit, 759 F.2d 542, 545 (6th Cir. 1985); Abrams, _________________ supra, 3.3.6, at 147-52.
discussed
Cited "see"
Roma Construction Company and Peter Zanni v. Ralph R. Arusso
(2×)
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers Nat’l Bank of Detroit, 759 F.2d 542, 545 (6th Cir.1985); Abrams, supra, § 3.3.6, at 147-52.
cited
Cited "see"
Conopco, Inc., D/B/A Van Den Bergh Foods Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Campbell Soup Company, Defendants-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lester v. Brown
Columbans, 861 F.2d 761, 764 (1st Cir.1988); see Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 645 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Ruple v. City of Vermillion, 714 F.2d 860, 862 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1029 , 104 S.Ct. 1290 , 79 L.Ed.2d 692 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Ann Carter RENNIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,* Defendant-Appellee
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 650 (7th Cir.) (“[a]n appeal is frivolous where the result is obvious or when the appellant’s argument is wholly without merit”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); see also Smith v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 959 F.2d 655 , 661 (7th Cir.1992) (“[sanctions are appropriate if the appeal was prosecuted with no reasonable expectation of altering the district court’s judgment and for purposes of delay or harassment or sheer obstinacy”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taajwar K. Rasheed-Bey v. James E. Aiken, 1 Jack Duckworth, and Indiana Attorney General
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat'l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 645-46 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 (1986); see also Manning v. City of Auburn, 953 F.2d 1355, 1360 (11th Cir.1992); Young-Henderson v. Spartanburg Area Mental Health Center, 945 F.2d 770, 773-75 (4th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Quantum Pharmics, Inc.
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 797 F.2d 70, 79 (2d Cir.1986) (plaintiffs licensees, and not plaintiff, were injured parties of defendant’s alleged tortious conduct and it was those licensees who may bring an action for unjust enrichment), aff 'g, 615 F.Supp. 838, 855-56 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (rejecting theory that plaintiff can recover monies unjustly received by defendant from a third party), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986). 54 PIL concedes that it knew of the copyrights, and continued publication after receiving a specific warning, but contends that it believed in good faith that its actions were lawful.
cited
Cited "see"
Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of New York Environmental Control Board v. H.S.C. Management Corp.
Moreover, the statutory safeguards for personal service contained in section 1404 (d) (2) are designed to meet due process standards by ensuring that parties subject to civil penalties will be accorded "notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise [them] of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections” (Mullane v Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 US 306, 314 ; see, Sterling v Environmental Control Bd., 793 F2d 52, cert denied 479 US 987 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Imaf, SpA v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 797 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.1986) (awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendant when the plaintiff brought suit only for the purpose of joining in defendant’s profits), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986); Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pompano-Windy City Partners, Ltd. v. Bear Stearns & Co.
Rather, the fraud must have been integral to the plaintiff’s purchase or sale of the security.” Flickinger, supra, 947 F.2d at 598 (quoting Pross v. Katz, 784 F.2d 455, 459 (2d Cir.1986)) (citations omitted); accord Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 847 (2d Cir.) (“To fall within Section 10(b), misrepresentations must have some direct pertinence to a securities transaction.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); see also Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 731-749 , 95 S.Ct. 1917, 1923-32 , 44 L.Ed.2d 539 (1975) (requiring s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Shirt Co. v. New Jersey National Bank
See In re Sunrise Securities Litigation, 916 F.2d 874 , 886 (3d Cir.1990) (“decreases in share value reflect decreases in the value of the company”), citing Rand v. Araconda-Ericcson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Gaff v. FDIC, 828 F.2d 1145, 1150 (6th Cir.1987) (“diminution in the value of corporate stock constitutes a direct injury to the corporation”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois Hospital Ass'n v. Edgar
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 790 F.2d 638, 646 (7th Cir.1986), *1348 cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986) (to the extent that the second suit alleges facts occurring after the filing of the first suit, the second suit is not barred by res judicata). a.Count I Count I challenges the non-ICARE rate setting methodology.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lloyd's U.S. Corp. v. Smallwood
Co., 247 F.2d 116, 122 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 903 , 78 S.Ct. 331 , 2 L.Ed.2d 260 (1957); see Austin v. Servac Shipping Line, 794 F.2d 941, 946 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Cliff's Notes, Inc. v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 746 F.2d 112, 115 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 *1162 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Sage Realty Corp. v. Sage Group, Inc.
See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co, 746 F.2d 112 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sound Video Unlimited, Inc. v. Video Shack Inc.
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericcson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers Nat’l Bank, 759 F.2d 542, 544 (6th Cir.1985); Nordberg v. Lord, Day & Lord, 107 F.R.D. 692, 699 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
WAIT RADIO BY ROSENFIELD v. Price Waterhouse
See Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 790 F.2d 638, 650 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
C & W Construction Co. v. Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 745
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 623 F.Supp. 176, 182 (E.D.N.Y.1985), affirmed, 794 F.2d 843 , 849 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Sellers v. General Motors Corp., 590 F.Supp. 502, 507 (E.D.Pa.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. Bassini
See Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. Brenton First Nat’l Bank, 245 F.3d 721 , 729 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 245 F.3d 721 (8th Cir.2001) (in banc); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) ("[Djiminution in value of the corporate assets is insufficient direct harm to give the shareholder standing to sue in his own right.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strougo v. Bassini
Id. at 359-60, 369 . 4 "Shareholder standing" is a term used to describe the ability of a shareholder to seek redress for certain injuries on his or her own behalf rather than on behalf of the corporation See Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. Brenton First Nat'l Bank, 245 F.3d 721 , 729 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 245 F.3d 721 (8th Cir.2001) (in banc); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) ("[D]iminution in value of the corporate assets is insufficient direct harm to give the shareholder standing to sue in his own right.") (citation and internal quotation marks o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ownby v. Cohen
See Frank v. D'Ambrosi, 4 F.3d at 1385; see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.1986). (diminution in value of corporate asset is insufficient direct harm to give a shareholder standing to sue under RICO), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
T & T GEOTECHNICAL, INC. v. Union Pacific Resources Co.
See, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, 734 F.2d at 710-11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York
See, e.g., Universal Studios v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986); Riddell Sports Inc. v. Brooks, 872 F.Supp. 73, 76 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Leisure, J.). 19.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dillon v. Chicago South Shore & North Bend Railway Co.
See e.g., Smith Plumbing Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. (1986), 149 Ariz. 524 , 720 P.2d 499 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 ; Herweg v. Bd. of Educ. (1983), Okla., 673 P.2d 154 ; Crowell v. School Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Train Collision at Gray, Ind.
See e.g., Smith Plumbing Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. (1986), 149 Ariz. 524 , 720 P.2d 499 , cert, denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 ; Herweg v. Bd. of Educ. (1983), Okla., 673 P.2d 154 ; Crowell v. School Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lazaros v. City of West Haven
See Christ-Janer v. A. F. Conte & Co., 8 Conn. App. 83, 88 , 511 A.2d 1017 (1986); see also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S. Ct. 579 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lehman's Inc. of Anderson v. Hittle (In Re Hittle)
In re Wien, 155 B.R. 479, 487 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1993); see also Spiegel v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 790 F.2d 638 , 645 (7th Cir.1986) (finding a judgment on motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim was a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Piazza v. Major League Baseball
See also, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.
Compare Food Service, Inc., 129 F.R.D. at 129 (“personal interest”) with Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank, 609 F.Supp. 1083 (N.D.Ill.1985) (“principals”), affd, 790 F.2d 638 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Standardbred Owners Ass'n v. Roosevelt Raceway Associates, L.P.
This rule is intended to preclude recovery by plaintiffs who “complain[] of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person,” Holmes, supra, — U.S. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 1318 ; see, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (corporate shareholders or creditors suing for injuries to the corporation), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Standardbred Owners Association v. Roosevelt Raceway Associates, L.P.
This rule is intended to preclude recovery by plaintiffs who "complain[ ] of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person," Holmes, supra, --- U.S. at ----, 112 S.Ct. at 1318 ; see, e.g., Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (corporate shareholders or creditors suing for injuries to the corporation), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 7 Plaintiffs in the instant case are not making a claim that is derivative of injury, if any, sustained by the IDA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WWW Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Gillette Co.
See, e.g., Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70 (2d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986); Diamond Supply Co. v. Prudential Paper Products Co., 589 F.Supp. 470 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd without op., 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thornton v. Butler
See also Sterling v. Environmental Control Board of the City of New York, 793 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.) ("Notices posted on exterior doors of urban multiple residences may well disappear quickly due to forces human or natural”), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986). 28 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minpeco, S.A. v. Hunt
See also Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2d Cir.) (affirming dismissal of RICO claim where injury was derivative), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Warren v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, 759 F.2d 542, 544-45 (6th Cir.1985) (holding that defendant’s fraud was directed at company as corporate entity, not toward plaintiff as its employee and thus plaintiff’s loss of employment was merely incidental to corporation’s injury and not an injury sustained “by reason of” defendant’s fraudulent conduct).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enercomp, Inc. v. Mccorhill Publishing, Inc.
Corp., 108 A.D.2d 351, 354 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 478, 480 (1st Dep't 1985); see also Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enercomp, Inc. v. McCorhill Publishing, Inc.
Corp., 108 A.D.2d 351, 354 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 478, 480 (1st Dep’t 1985); see also Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., 797 F.2d 70, 75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 578 , 93 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Austin
v.
Lexington Insurance Co.
v.
Lexington Insurance Co.
No. 86-583.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.