green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family: United States v. United Mine Wor… ↗
Quoted verbatim 4×
14.7 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases, 1999–2023 ·
…there is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment and art. 21 of the maryland declaration of rights....
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clark v. State
there is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment and art. 21 of the maryland declaration of rights....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clark v. State
there is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment and art. 21 of the maryland declaration of rights....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clark v. State
there is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment and art. 21 of the maryland declaration of rights....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Perry v. Maryland
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
there is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment and art. 21 of the maryland declaration of rights....
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sayles
See id. - 28 - 365 A.2d 545, 552-53 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 (1977), this Court held that the trial court properly sustained an objection to defense counsel’s opening statement because counsel’s statement encouraged the jury to disregard the law, thereby essentially encouraging the jury to engage in jury nullification.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hawkins
(2×)
State v. Downs, 168 Wash. 664, 667 , 13 P.2d 1 (1932); accord, State v. Mak, 105 Wash.2d 692, 716-717 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986); State v. Russell, 125 Wash.2d 24, 75 , 882 P.2d 747 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1129 , 115 S.Ct. 2004 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1995). ¶ 37 The parties argue this case at the intersection of other suspects evidence and the defendant's right to present his defense.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hawkins
State v. Downs, 168 Wash. 664, 667 , 13 P.2d 1 (1932); accord State v. Kwan Fai Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 716-717 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986); State v. Russell, 125 Wn.2d 24, 75 , 882 P.2d 747 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1129 (1995). ¶37 The parties argue this case at the intersection of other suspects evidence and the defendant’s right to present his defense.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richie v. Sirmons
(2×)
See Fox v. State, 779 P.2d 562, 573 (Okl.Cr.1989), cert denied, 494 U.S. 1060 , 110 S.Ct. 1538 , 108 L.Ed.2d 777 (1990), (quoting Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 284 (Okl.Cr.), cert denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986)).
examined
Cited "see"
Black v. State
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Newsted v. State, 1986 OK CR 82 , ¶ 15, 720 P.2d 734, 739 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Johann Breyer v. Doris Meissner, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Linnas v. INS, 790 F.2d 1024, 1032 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 600 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Breyer v. Meissner
See Linnas v. INS, 790 F.2d 1024, 1032 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loggins v. State
(2×)
See Haney v. State , 603 So.2d 368 , 396 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), aff'd, 603 So.2d 412 (Ala. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 925 , 113 S.Ct. 1297 , 122 L.Ed.2d 687 (1993), quoting Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 , 141 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986) (holding that "the fact that a photograph is gruesome and ghastly is no reason to exclude its admission into evidence, if it has some relevancy to the proceedings, even if the photographs may tend to inflame the jury").
discussed
Cited "see"
Goudy v. State
(2×)
Accord State v. Mak, 105 Wash.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407, 417-18 (1986), cert. denied, Mak v. Washington, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986) (the mere possibility that some item of undisclosed evidence might help the defense does not require the trial court to conduct an in camera review of police investigative files). *696 V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Conyers v. State
See State v. Tichnell, 306 Md. 428 , 509 A.2d 1179 (would have been reversible error to admit evidence of defendant’s mere arrests at capital murder trial, but error was cured by court’s jury instruction), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 598 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986); Henry v. State, 273 Md. 131, 147-48 , 328 A.2d 293, 303 (1974) (quoting Henry v. State, 20 Md.App. 296, 314 , 315 A.2d 797, 807 (1974)(Davidson, J., concurring and dissenting) (“[I]t has been recognized that when they stand alone, bald accusations of criminal conduct for which a person either has not been tried or has …
discussed
Cited "see"
Richie v. State
(2×)
See Fox v. State, 779 P.2d 562, 573 (Okl.Cr.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1060 , 110 S.Ct. 1538 , 108 L.Ed.2d 777 (1990), (quoting Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 284 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brett
(2×)
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 724 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hooker v. State
(2×)
See Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 284 (Okl.Cr.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pacheco
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 731 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trice v. State
(2×)
See Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986); Wright v. State, 617 P.2d 1354, 1355 (Okl.Cr.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chukwurah v. United States
See Linnas v. INS, 790 F.2d 1024, 1030 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 600 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986), reh’g denied, 479 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 964 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1987); see generally Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 39 , 44 S.Ct. 283, 286 , 68 L.Ed. 549 (1924).
examined
Cited "see"
Castro v. State
(4×)
See Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734, 739 (Okl.Cr.1986) cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Post
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 701 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Howland
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 716 , 718 P.2d 409 (before a defendant can introduce evidence connecting another person with the crime charged, there must be a train of facts or circumstances tending to point to someone besides the accused as the guilty party), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). *598 Mr. Howland also attempted to call a third resident of the apartments to testify that April Short had once assaulted Forrester.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mack v. State
(2×)
See Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124, 141 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), aff' d, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kilpatrick v. State
(2×)
See Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 , 137-38 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), affirmed, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kazys Palciauskas A/K/A Kazimieral Palciauskas v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Linnas v. INS, 790 F.2d 1024, 1031 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 [ 107 S.Ct. 600 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 ] (1986). 11 Because the Board of Immigration Appeals improperly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel, we reverse and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bertarelli v. State
(2×)
See Magwood v. State, 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), aff’d, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Woods v. State
(2×)
See Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), aff'd 494 So.2d 154 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beadnell v. State
(2×)
See Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985), affd, 494 So.2d 154 (Ala.), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rempel
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 701 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Freeman v. State
(4×)
See Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734, 739 (Okl.Cr. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 ; and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Munson v. State
See Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 285 (Okla.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986); Van Woundenberg v. State, 720 P.2d 328, 337 (Okla.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 447 , 93 L.Ed.2d 395 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. State
See Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 285 (Okla.Crim.App.1986), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Personal Restraint of Jeffries
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 728-29 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 93 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Wilkett v. State
See Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 278 (Okla.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Klingel v. State
See Magwood v. State , 494 So.2d 124 , 136 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), affirmed, Ex parte Magwood , 494 So.2d 154 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied, [___] U.S. [___], 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986); Smith v. State , 489 So.2d 638 , 640 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Castro v. State
See Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734, 740 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles R. Campbell v. Larry Kincheloe
(2×)
See State v. Mak, 105 Wash.2d 692 , 718 P.2d 407, 444 (construing section 10.95.-060(4) to place the burden of proof on the state, and suggesting that an instruction expressing the state’s burden in terms of “proving” rather than “convincing” may be more appropriate), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986); see also State v. Rupe, 101 Wash.2d 664 , 683 P.2d 571, 593 (1984) (rejecting similar burden of proof argument).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Rupe
(6×)
See State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 755 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 107 S. Ct. 599 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Washington v. Jerry Lee Micheau
App. 2d 185, 200, 494 P.3d 458 (2021) (quoting State v. Emery, 174 Wn.2d 741, 756 , 278 P.3d 653 (2012)); see also State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 726 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kilgore
See, e.g., State v. Kwan Fai Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 710 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986); State v. Kunze, 97 Wn.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kilgore
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Mak, 105 Wash.2d 692, 710 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986); State v. Kunze, 97 Wash.App. 832, 859 , 988 P.2d 977 (1999), review denied, 140 Wash.2d 1022 , 10 P.3d 404 (2000). [27] Kilgore makes no argument about why the arrest for third degree theft would be admissible. [28] In Minnesota, the trial court must find by clear and convincing evidence that the witness did the prior bad act.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Duckett v. State
(4×)
See also Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 284 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gentry
(2×)
See also State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 757 , 718 P.2d 407 (it is not a comment on the evidence when it does not convey to the jury the personal attitudes of the judge toward the merits of the cause), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986), sentence vacated on writ of habeas corpus sub mom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Russell
(2×)
State v. Kwan, 174 Wash. 528, 532-33 , 25 P.2d 104 (1933) (citing State v. Downs, 168 Wash. 664, 667 , 13 P.2d 1 (1932)); see also State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 716 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Paxton v. State
(4×)
See also Walker v. State, 723 P.2d 273, 284 (Okl.Cr.1986) cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986); Brogie v. State, 695 P.2d 538, 544 (Okl.Cr.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Extradition of Sandhu
See, e.g., Linnas v. INS, 790 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir.) (allegation that subject of deportation proceedings faced death sentence and absence of due process), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 600 , 93 L.Ed.2d 600 (1986); Escobedo v. United States, 623 F.2d 1098 (5th Cir.) (allegation that extraditee faced torture and murder if returned to requesting state), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 612 , 66 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980); Sindona, 619 F.2d at 174 (allegation that extraditee faced risk of murder or injury at the hands of his political enemies).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Riley
App. 869, 876 , 809 P.2d 209 , review denied, 118 Wn.2d 1007 (1991); see also State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 726 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graves v. State
Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 271 , 101 S.Ct. 1097, 1103 , 67 L.Ed.2d 220 (1981); Austin v. State, 327 Md. 375 , 609 A.2d 728 (1992); Pressley v. State, 220 Md. 558 , 155 A.2d 494 (1959); Kent v. State, 11 Md.App. 293 , 273 A.2d 819 (1971); see also State v. Tichnell, 306 Md. 428, 440 , 509 A.2d 1179 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 598 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) (no distinction between right guaranteed under federal constitution and the right to counsel ensured by Article 21). *657 To establish a violation of the constitutional right, “a defendant ‘must establish that an actual conf…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Bouwkamp v. State
(4×)
See also Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986), which was a death penalty case involving a shooting of a taxicab driver in the back of his head in conjunction with an admitted robbery.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
Illinois Tichnell v. Maryland Spaziano v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Newsted v. Oklahoma Magwood v. Alabama Mak v. Washington Walker v. Oklahoma Rogers v. Georgia
v.
Illinois Tichnell v. Maryland Spaziano v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Newsted v. Oklahoma Magwood v. Alabama Mak v. Washington Walker v. Oklahoma Rogers v. Georgia
No. 86-277; No. 86-5453; No. 86-5617; No. 86-5631; No. 86-5639; No. 86-5644; No. 86-5683; No. 86-5686.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Lead Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Ct. App. Md.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;
Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. Wash.;
Ct. Crim. App. Okla.; and
Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 86-277, 109 Ill. 2d 484, 488 N. E. 2d 529; No. 86-5453, 306 Md. 428, 509 A. 2d 1179; No. 86-5617, 489 So. 2d 720; No. 86-5631, 720 P. 2d 734; No. 86-5639, 494 So. 2d 124; No. 86-5644, 105 Wash. 2d 692, 718 P. 2d 407; No. 86-5683, 723 P. 2d 273; No. 86-5686, 256 Ga. 140, 344 S. E. 2d 644.
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.